Literature DB >> 29131600

Environmental DNA (eDNA) Shedding and Decay Rates to Model Freshwater Mussel eDNA Transport in a River.

Brandon J Sansom1, Lauren M Sassoubre1.   

Abstract

Freshwater mussels are vital components of stream ecosystems, yet remain threatened. Thus, timely and accurate species counts are critical for proper conservation and management. Mussels live in stream sediments and can be challenging to survey given constraints related to water depth, flow, and time of year. The use of environmental DNA (eDNA) to monitor mussel distributions and diversity is a promising tool. Before it can be used as a monitoring tool, however, we need to know how much eDNA mussels shed into their environment and how long the eDNA persists. Here, we present a novel application of eDNA to estimate both the presence/absence and abundance of a freshwater mussel species, Lampsilis siliquoidea. The eDNA shedding and decay rates reported within are the first for freshwater mussels. We determined that eDNA shedding was statistically similar across mussel densities, but that first-order decay constants varied between experimental treatments. Finally, we effectively modeled downstream transport of eDNA and present a model that can be used as a complementary tool to estimate mussel density. Our results suggest that eDNA has the potential to be a complementary tool to survey mussels and enhance current efforts to monitor and protect freshwater mussel biodiversity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29131600     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b05199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   11.357


  12 in total

Review 1.  Predicting the fate of eDNA in the environment and implications for studying biodiversity.

Authors:  Jori B Harrison; Jennifer M Sunday; Sean M Rogers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Environmental DNA allows upscaling spatial patterns of biodiversity in freshwater ecosystems.

Authors:  Luca Carraro; Elvira Mächler; Remo Wüthrich; Florian Altermatt
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Persistence of environmental DNA in marine systems.

Authors:  Rupert A Collins; Owen S Wangensteen; Eoin J O'Gorman; Stefano Mariani; David W Sims; Martin J Genner
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2018-11-05

4.  Comparing the efficiency of open and enclosed filtration systems in environmental DNA quantification for fish and jellyfish.

Authors:  Sayaka Takahashi; Masayuki K Sakata; Toshifumi Minamoto; Reiji Masuda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Environmental DNA and RNA as Records of Human Exposome, Including Biotic/Abiotic Exposures and Its Implications in the Assessment of the Role of Environment in Chronic Diseases.

Authors:  Indu Shekhar Thakur; Deodutta Roy
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Influence of sediment and stream transport on detecting a source of environmental DNA.

Authors:  Meredith B Nevers; Kasia Przybyla-Kelly; Dawn Shively; Charles C Morris; Joshua Dickey; Murulee N Byappanahalli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Meta-analysis shows that environmental DNA outperforms traditional surveys, but warrants better reporting standards.

Authors:  Julija Fediajevaite; Victoria Priestley; Richard Arnold; Vincent Savolainen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Effectiveness assessment of using riverine water eDNA to simultaneously monitor the riverine and riparian biodiversity information.

Authors:  Haile Yang; Hao Du; Hongfang Qi; Luxian Yu; Xindong Hou; Hui Zhang; Junyi Li; Jinming Wu; Chengyou Wang; Qiong Zhou; Qiwei Wei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Estimating species distribution and abundance in river networks using environmental DNA.

Authors:  Luca Carraro; Hanna Hartikainen; Jukka Jokela; Enrico Bertuzzo; Andrea Rinaldo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Harnessing the power of eDNA metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes.

Authors:  Beverly McClenaghan; Nicole Fahner; David Cote; Julek Chawarski; Avery McCarthy; Hoda Rajabi; Greg Singer; Mehrdad Hajibabaei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.