Literature DB >> 29130134

Is it possible to improve prognostic value of NCCN-IPI in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma? The prognostic significance of comorbidities.

Darko Antic1,2, Jelena Jelicic3, Goran Trajkovic4, Milena Todorovic Balint3,5, Jelena Bila3,5, Olivera Markovic5,6, Ivan Petkovic7, Vesna Nikolic8, Bosko Andjelic3,5, Vladislava Djurasinovic3,5, Aleksandra Sretenovic3, Mihailo Smiljanic3, Vojin Vukovic3, Biljana Mihaljevic3,5.   

Abstract

The prognostic value of the International Prognostic Index (IPI) has been re-evaluated in the rituximab-treated diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. Accordingly, National Comprehensive Cancer Network-IPI (NCCN-IPI) has been introduced to estimate prognosis of DLBCL patients. However, comorbidities that frequently affect elderly DLBCL patients were not analyzed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of comorbidities using Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) in 962 DLBCL patients. According to CCI, majority of patients (73.6%) did not have any comorbidity, while high CCI (≥ 2) was observed in 71/962 (7.4%) patients, and in 55/426 (12.9%) of the elderly patients aged ≥ 60 years. When the CCI was analyzed in a multivariate model along with the NCCN-IPI parameters, it stood out as a threefold independent risk factor of a lethal outcome. Also, we have developed a novel comorbidity-NCCN-IPI (cNCCN-IPI) by adding additional 3 points if the patient had a CCI ≥ 2. Four risk groups emerged with the following patient distribution in low, low-intermediate, high-intermediate, and high group: 3.4, 34.3, 49.4, and 12.5%, respectively. The prognostic value of the new cNCCN-IPI was 2.1% improved compared to that of the IPI, and 1.3% improved compared to that of the NCCN-IPI (p < 0.05). This difference was more pronounced in elderly patients, in whom the cNCCN-IPI showed a 5.1% better discriminative power compared to that of the IPI, and 3.6% better compared to the NCCN-IPI. The NCCN-IPI enhanced by the CCI and combined with redistributed risk groups is better for differentiating risk categories in unselected DLBCL patients, especially in the elderly.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Charlson comorbidity index; DLBCL; NCCN-IPI

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29130134     DOI: 10.1007/s00277-017-3170-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hematol        ISSN: 0939-5555            Impact factor:   3.673


  4 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with multiple myeloma in South Tyrol: a retrospective single-center analysis.

Authors:  Maximilian Mair; Christian Straka; Thomas Buratti; Martina Tauber; Manfred Mitterer; Dominic Fong
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.673

2.  The Prognostic Impact of Comorbidities in Patients with De-Novo Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated with R-CHOP Immunochemotherapy in Curative Intent.

Authors:  Florian Kocher; Michael Mian; Andreas Seeber; Michael Fiegl; Reinhard Stauder
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 3.  Statistical Challenges in Development of Prognostic Models in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Comparison Between Existing Models - A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jelena Jelicic; Thomas Stauffer Larsen; Henrik Frederiksen; Bosko Andjelic; Milos Maksimovic; Zoran Bukumiric
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.790

4.  Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma: A New Approach in a Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Rafet Eren; Istemi Serin; Suheyla Atak; Betul Zehra Pirdal; Nihan Nizam; Aliihsan Gemici; Demet Aydın; Naciye Demirel; Esma Evrim Dogan; Osman Yokus
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 0.915

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.