| Literature DB >> 29130022 |
Stephen C Haskins1, Jinhui Zhao2, Jemiel A Nejim1, Kara Fields1, Sean Garvin1, Sumudu Dehipawala3, James D Beckman1, Angie Zhang1, James A Osorio4, Christopher Tanaka5.
Abstract
At our institution, implementation of a formal training course in Basic Focus Assessed Transthoracic Echocardiography (FATE) was associated with an improvement in anesthesia trainees' ability to obtain transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) images. Total image acquisition scores improved by a median (Q1, Q3) 9.1 (2.9,14.7) percentage points from pre-to post-hands-on FATE course (n=20; p=0.001). Participants who returned for a subsequent assessment 5 months following the course demonstrated a median (Q1, Q3) 18.0 (9.1,22.1) percentage point improvement from their pre-course total image acquisition scores (n=11; p=0.002). This pilot study established the feasibility of our program and results suggest that the basic FATE course can be used to teach trainees TTE quickly, effectively, and with significant retention.Entities:
Keywords: Anesthesia trainees; Education; Focused cardiac ultrasound; Point-of-Care ultrasound
Year: 2017 PMID: 29130022 PMCID: PMC5679106 DOI: 10.4172/2155-6148.1000763
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anesth Clin Res ISSN: 2155-6148
Figure 1Participant Flow Diagram.
Baseline participant information.
| Returned for assessment of skill 5 months after course | All | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | 23 | ||
| All | 12 | 11 | ||
| Level of Training | Resident CA-2 | 2 (16.70%) | 1 (9.10%) | 3 (13.00%) |
| Resident CA-3 | 4 (33.30%) | 4 (36.40%) | 8 (34.80%) | |
| Fellow-Cardiac | 2 (16.70%) | 1 (9.10%) | 3 (13.00%) | |
| Fellow-Regional | 3 (25.00%) | 5 (45.50%) | 8 (34.80%) | |
| Fellow-Obstetric | 1 (8.30%) | 0 | 1 (4.30%) | |
| Rank your experience with Ultrasound (all forms including peripheral nerve blocks and vascular access) | very limited (less than 20 times) | 1 (8.30%) | 0 | 1 (4.30%) |
| somewhat (between 20–50 times) | 4 (33.30%) | 5 (45.50%) | 9 (39.10%) | |
| very (between 50–100 times) | 3 (25.00%) | 4 (36.40%) | 7 (30.40%) | |
| extensive (>100 times) | 4 (33.30%) | 2 (18.20%) | 6 (26.10%) | |
| Have you ever performed a focused TTE? | No | 11 (91.70%) | 8 (72.70%) | 19 (82.60%) |
| Yes | 1 (8.30%) | 3 (27.30%) | 4 (17.40%) | |
| How familiar are you with focused TTE? | Aware but never seen or used | 1 (8.30%) | 2 (18.20%) | 3 (13.00%) |
| Seen but never performed | 9 (75.00%) | 7 (63.60%) | 16 (69.60%) | |
| Performed limited number, but no formal training | 2 (16.70%) | 2 (18.20%) | 4 (17.40%) | |
Figure 2Box-and-whisker plots of image acquisition scores (in percentage points) after completion of online module but before hands-on training course (“After E-learning”), after completion of hands on training course (“After FATE 2014”), and at follow-up 5 months later (“FATE 2015”).
Correlation between number of cardiac ultrasound exams performed in 5 months the follow-up period and post-course to 5- month follow up change in image acquisition score.
| FATE-protocol view | Spearman Correlation Coefficient | 95% Confidence Interval | P Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | Total | 0.46 | −0.2 | 0.83 | 0.163 |
| TTE exams | 0.61 | 0.01 | 0.89 | 0.046 | |
| S4C | Total | 0.63 | 0.05 | 0.89 | 0.036 |
| TTE exams | 0.81 | 0.41 | 0.95 | 0.002 | |
| A4C | Total | −0.17 | −0.7 | 0.48 | 0.623 |
| TTE exams | −0.12 | −0.67 | 0.52 | 0.733 | |
| PLA | Total | 0.36 | −0.31 | 0.79 | 0.287 |
| TTE exams | 0.4 | −0.27 | 0.8 | 0.237 | |
| PSA | Total | −0.53 | −0.86 | 0.11 | 0.097 |
| TTE exams | −0.27 | −0.75 | 0.39 | 0.425 | |
| PV | Total | −0.09 | −0.65 | 0.54 | 0.8 |
| TTE exams | 0.12 | −0.51 | 0.67 | 0.723 | |
| PV2 | Total | 0.35 | −0.31 | 0.79 | 0.298 |
| TTE exams | 0.15 | −0.49 | 0.69 | 0.669 | |
Statistically significant (p<0.05)
Abbreviations: S4C: Subcostal 4 Chamber view; A4C: Apical 4 Chamber view; PLA: Parasternal Long Axis view; PSA: Parasternal Left Ventricular Short Axis view; PV: Pleural (Left) view; PV2: pleural (Right) view.