Literature DB >> 29128762

Stable isotope evidences for identifying crop water uptake in a typical winter wheat-summer maize rotation field in the North China Plain.

Xin Zhao1, Fadong Li2, Zhipin Ai3, Jing Li4, Congke Gu5.   

Abstract

Better managing agricultural water resources, which are increasingly stressed by climate change and anthropogenic activities, is difficult, particularly because of variations in water uptake patterns associated with crop type and growth stage. Thus, the stable isotopes δ18O and δ2H were employed to investigate the water uptake patterns of a summer maize (Zea mays L.) and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) rotation system in the North China Plain. Based on the soil water content, soil layers were divided into four groups (0-20cm, 20-40cm, 40-120cm, and 120-200cm) using a hierarchical cluster analysis. The main soil layer of water uptake for summer maize was from 0-20cm at the trefoil (77.8%) and jointing (48.6%) stages to 20-40cm at the booting (33.6%) and heading (32.6%) stages, became 40-120cm at the silking (32.0%) and milking (36.7%) stages, and then returned to 0-20cm at the mature (35.0%) and harvest (52.4%) stages. Winter wheat most absorbed water from the 0-20cm soil water at the wintering (86.6%), seedling (83.7%), jointing (45.2%), booting (51.4%), heading (28.8%), and mature (67.8%) stages, but it was 20-40cm at the flowering (34.8%) and milking (25.2%) stages. The dry root weight density was positively correlated with the contributions of the water uptake for winter wheat. However, no similar correlation was found in summer maize. Regression analysis indicated that the soil volumetric water content (SVWC) was negatively correlated with the contribution of the water uptake (CWU) for summer maize (CWU=-0.91×SVWC+57.75) and winter wheat (CWU=-2.03×SVWC+92.73). These different responses to water uptake contributions suggested that a traditional irrigation event should be postponed from the booting to flowering stage of winter wheat. This study provides insights into crop water uptake and agricultural water management.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crop water use; Dry root weight density; Irrigation management; Soil volumetric water content; δ(18)O and δ(2)H

Year:  2017        PMID: 29128762     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  3 in total

1.  Different Responses in Root Water Uptake of Summer Maize to Planting Density and Nitrogen Fertilization.

Authors:  Yang Gao; Jinsai Chen; Guangshuai Wang; Zhandong Liu; Weihao Sun; Yingying Zhang; Xiaoxian Zhang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Effect of coupled reduced irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on soil mite community composition in a wheat field.

Authors:  Chunyan Zheng; Fang Ouyang; Xianghui Liu; Junhua Ma; Fenghua Zhao; Zhu Ouyang; Feng Ge
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Root Architecture and Functional Traits of Spring Wheat Under Contrasting Water Regimes.

Authors:  Nidia Brunel-Saldias; Juan Pedro Ferrio; Abdelhalim Elazab; Massiel Orellana; Alejandro Del Pozo
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 5.753

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.