Literature DB >> 2912871

Paragangliomas: assessment of prognosis by histologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural techniques.

K E Kliewer1, D R Wen, P A Cancilla, A J Cochran.   

Abstract

To predict clinical outcome, we studied 42 paragangliomas from 37 patients by routine histology, immunohistochemistry, and electron microscopy. A panel of antisera to neuron-specific enolase (NSE), chromogranin, and met-enkephalin was used to identify chief (type I) cells, and S-100 protein and glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) sustentacular (type II) cells. The intensity of staining of type I cells and the density of type II cells were assessed semiquantitatively (0 to 4+) in a total of 38 tumors. A total of 23 of 24 low-grade tumors (solitary, multiple, or associated with other neoplasms; 95.8%) contained type II cells immunoreactive with either S-100 protein or GFAP, and all were positive when S-100 protein and GFAP were used in combination. Five of the nine intermediate-grade (recurrent and/or locally aggressive) tumors were identified as glomus jugulare tumors (GJT). Three intermediate-grade GJTs were devoid of GFAP-reactive type II cells and four GJTs were negative for S-100 protein. Type II cells were identified in only one of five high-grade (malignant) paragangliomas and that tumor contained vanishingly rare cells that were weakly S-100 protein positive but GFAP negative. Sustentacular cell density and chief cell staining intensity were both inversely related to tumor grade. The most sensitive chief cell marker was NSE (92.1%), followed by chromogranin (84.2%). The least sensitive (73.0%) and specific marker was met-enkephalin. Combinations of NSE or chromogranin with met-enkephalin identified chief cells in all cases. Electron microscopy identified neurosecretory granule-containing chief cells, but was of less value in delineating sustentacular cells because of their scarcity and the absence of specific features. By comparison, immunohistochemistry was superior in identifying sustentacular cells. The use of an immunohistochemical panel, in addition to routine histology, can confirm the diagnosis of a paraganglioma and can give an indication of the likely prognosis for a patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2912871     DOI: 10.1016/0046-8177(89)90199-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  47 in total

Review 1.  Emerging role of dopamine in neovascularization of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.

Authors:  Thamara E Osinga; Thera P Links; Robin P F Dullaart; Karel Pacak; Anouk N A van der Horst-Schrivers; Michiel N Kerstens; Ido P Kema
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Gallbladder paraganglioma.

Authors:  İlhan Ece; Hüsnü Alptekin; Zeliha Esin Çelik; Mustafa Şahin
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2014-09-08

3.  Malignant paraganglioma of the uterus.

Authors:  A Beham; C Schmid; C D Fletcher; L Auböck; H Pickel
Journal:  Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol       Date:  1992

4.  Studies for estimating the biologic behavior and prognosis of paragangliomas in the head and neck.

Authors:  H J Welkoborsky; Y Xiao; W J Mann; R G Amedee; H P Dienes; B Volk
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1995

5.  Diagnostic efficiency of multidetector computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of head and neck paragangliomas from other mimicking vascular lesions: comparison with histopathologic examination.

Authors:  Mohammed Farghally Amin; Nadia Farouk El Ameen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Cauda equina paraganglioma: a review.

Authors:  George C Miliaras; Athanassios P Kyritsis; Konstantinos S Polyzoidis
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 7.  [Glomus tumors of the head-neck-region].

Authors:  C Axmann; U Dorenbeck; W Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Familial cervical paragangliomas with lymph node metastasis expressing somatostatin receptor type 2A.

Authors:  Noriko Kimura; Hiroo Tateno; Shigeru Saijo; Akira Horii
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.943

9.  Case report: intra-renal paraganglioma masquerading as a renal cyst.

Authors:  M Rafique; R A Bhutta; S Muzzafar
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Tracheal paraganglioma.

Authors:  A P Gallimore; P Goldstraw
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.