Literature DB >> 29128682

Randomized double-masked trial of eyelid cleansing treatments for blepharitis.

Justin Sung1, Michael T M Wang1, Sang H Lee1, Isabella M Y Cheung1, Salim Ismail1, Trevor Sherwin1, Jennifer P Craig2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of a dedicated eyelid cleanser and diluted baby shampoo in the management of blepharitis.
METHODS: Forty-three participants with clinical blepharitis signs were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double-masked, paired-eye trial. A dedicated eyelid cleanser (TheraTears® SteriLid®) was applied to the eyelids of one eye (randomized) and diluted baby shampoo (Johnson's® No More Tears®) to the fellow eye, twice daily for 4 weeks. Tear film parameters, ocular surface characteristics, symptomology and cytology markers were assessed at baseline and day 28.
RESULTS: Baseline measurements did not differ between treatments (all p > 0.05). The eyelid cleanser was preferred over baby shampoo by the majority of participants (p < 0.001). Improvements in the tear lipid layer, inferior lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE), cylindrical collarettes, and MMP-9 expression were limited to the dedicated eyelid cleanser (all p < 0.05), and a greater decrease in SANDE symptoms score was also observed (p = 0.04). Meibomian gland capping and MUC5AC expression worsened with baby shampoo treatment (both p < 0.05). SPEED symptoms score, superior LWE, seborrhoeic lash crusting, and trichiasis decreased significantly following application of both treatments (all p < 0.05), but did not differ between treatments (all p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Clinical improvements in blepharitis occurred with both treatments. However, only the dedicated eyelid cleanser proved effective in reducing ocular surface inflammation, and was the preferred therapy. Long term impact of decreased goblet cell function secondary to baby shampoo treatment requires further exploration.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Baby shampoo; Blepharitis; Conjunctival impression cytology; Eyelid cleanser; Eyelid hygiene; Meibomian gland dysfunction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29128682     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ocul Surf        ISSN: 1542-0124            Impact factor:   5.033


  5 in total

1.  Comparative Evaluation of 5 Validated Symptom Questionnaires as Screening Instruments for Dry Eye Disease.

Authors:  Michael T M Wang; Ally L Xue; Jennifer P Craig
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 7.389

2.  Alterations in the ocular surface and tear film following keratoplasty.

Authors:  Jay J Meyer; Akilesh Gokul; Michael T M Wang; Justin Sung; Jennifer P Craig
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Validation of the Modified Schein Dry Eye Symptom Questionnaire and Comparison With the Ocular Surface Disease Index.

Authors:  Jerry R Paugh; Elaine Chen; Justin Kwan; Tiffany Nguyen; Alan Sasai; Melinda Thomas De Jesus; Andrew Loc Nguyen; Michael T Christensen; David Meadows
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Randomized double-blind trial of wipes containing terpinen-4-ol and hyaluronate versus baby shampoo in seborrheic blepharitis patients.

Authors:  Ceyhun Arici; Burak Mergen; Ayse Yildiz-Tas; Hrisi Bahar-Tokman; Edip Tokuc; Yesim Ozturk-Bakar; Zekayi Kutlubay; Afsun Sahin
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 5.  Non-pharmaceutical treatment options for meibomian gland dysfunction.

Authors:  Reiko Arita; Shima Fukuoka
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 2.742

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.