Literature DB >> 29128576

Evaluation of Tumor Pseudocapsule Status and its Prognostic Significance in Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Wei Xi1, Jiajun Wang1, Li Liu1, Ying Xiong1, Yang Qu1, Zhiyuan Lin1, Xiang Chen1, Zewei Wang1, Jiejie Xu2, Jianming Guo3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determined whether tumor pseudocapsule status, including the extent of invasion by cancer and lack of a pseudocapsule, has prognostic value in renal cell carcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 1,577 patients with different stages of renal cell carcinoma who underwent nephrectomy at our institution, of whom 1,307 (82.9%) were eligible for analysis. Presented pseudocapsules were classified as grade 0-completely intact, grade 1-merely involved and grade 2-penetrated. We studied overall and progression-free survival using the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox regression model.
RESULTS: Of the 1,307 patients 1,244 (95.2%) presented with a pseudocapsule, including 350 (28.1%), 643 (51.7%) and 251 (20.2%) with a grade 0, 1 and 2 pseudocapsule invasion extent, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed great losses in overall and progression-free survival for an increased extent of invasion and pseudocapsule absence. On multivariate analyses we identified significant overall and progression-free survival harms for grade 2 pseudocapsules (HR 2.12 and 2.66, each p <0.0001) and lack of a pseudocapsule (HR 1.95, p = 0.0248 and HR 2.54, p = 0.0007, respectively) compared to grade 0 pseudocapsules. A change in statistical risk from grade 1 to 0 was only detected for progression-free survival. The prognostic value of pseudocapsule status was shown by a higher HR on multivariable analyses in individuals with localized renal cell carcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that pseudocapsule status has good prognostic implications in renal cell carcinoma. Lack of a pseudocapsule certainly had a remarkably adverse impact on the patient outcome. Accessibility in use and cost makes pseudocapsule status a potential cost-effective parameter in clinical practice.
Copyright © 2018 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carcinoma; fascia; kidney; mortality; neoplasm invasiveness; renal cell

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29128576     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.10.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  3 in total

1.  [Small renal cell carcinoma-active surveillance and ablation].

Authors:  J J Wendler; R Damm; U-B Liehr; T Brunner; M Pech; M Schostak
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Prognostic significance of pseudocapsule status in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Wei Xi; Yingyong Hou; Xiaoyi Hu; Yu Xia; Shuai Jiang; Hang Wang; Qi Bai; Jun Hou; Jianming Guo
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-11

3.  No Detection of Pseudocapsule of Tumor-Parenchyma Interface on Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) Images: Clinical Significance and Histological Reflections in Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Wei Xi; Qinxuan Tan; Yingyong Hou; Xiaoyi Hu; Hang Wang; Li Liu; Yu Xia; Qi Bai; Jiajun Wang; Jianjun Zhou; Jianming Guo
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.989

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.