Literature DB >> 29128385

The effectiveness of shingles vaccine among Albertans aged 50 years or older: A retrospective cohort study.

Bruce M McDonald1, Douglas C Dover2, Kimberley A Simmonds3, Christopher A Bell4, Lawrence W Svenson5, Margaret L Russell6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the effectiveness of shingles vaccine in preventing incident shingles among Alberta residents aged 50 years or older over the period 2009 - 2015, using administrative health data.
METHODS: The cohort comprised of Albertans from the Alberta Health Care Insurance Plan Registry (AHCIP) as of June 30, 2009 and aged 50 years or older. Those who received shingles vaccine were identified from the provincial pharmaceutical information network. The occurrence of incident shingles was identified through both inpatient and outpatients/community care data. Incident shingles was defined as the earliest dated record of ICD 9-CM 053 or ICD-10-CA B02. Starting on November 1, 2009, individuals with no history of shingles or shingles vaccination were followed until Nov 1, 2015 (6 years), or until shingles incidence, death, or AHCIP cancellation (including leaving Alberta). Vaccine effectiveness (VE) was estimated as the inverse of the relative risk of developing incident shingles in each year following vaccination compared to time at risk without vaccination, while adjusting for age, sex, income quintile, and immune compromising conditions (identified from physician claims, inpatient, and cancer registry data).
RESULTS: There were 1,094,236 individuals in the cohort, with 85,439 (7.80%) vaccinated individuals. The shingles incidence rate was 9.03 [95% CI: 8.95, 9.11] cases per 1,000 person years (49,243 cases). Adjusted VE in the first year following immunization was 50.02% [95% CI: 44.71%, 54.83%] against incident shingles, decreasing to no effect by the fifth year (VE = 14.00% [95% CI: -20.99%, 38.88%]).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are consistent with observations from other population based studies and provide population level data for policy-makers to review when making decisions related to public funding of shingles vaccine.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alberta; Canada; Herpes zoster; Herpes zoster vaccine; Shingles; Shingles vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29128385     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.10.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  5 in total

1.  A systematic literature review of herpes zoster incidence worldwide.

Authors:  Désirée van Oorschot; Hilde Vroling; Eveline Bunge; John Diaz-Decaro; Desmond Curran; Barbara Yawn
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Herpes Zoster Burden in Canadian Provinces: A Narrative Review and Comparison with Quebec Provincial Data.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Letellier; Rachid Amini; Vladimir Gilca; Gisele Trudeau; Chantal Sauvageau
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 2.471

3.  Efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of herpes zoster vaccines in adults aged 50 and older: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrea C Tricco; Wasifa Zarin; Roberta Cardoso; Areti-Angeliki Veroniki; Paul A Khan; Vera Nincic; Marco Ghassemi; Rachel Warren; Jane P Sharpe; Andrea V Page; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-10-25

4.  A framework for the systematic consideration of ethics, equity, feasibility, and acceptability in vaccine program recommendations.

Authors:  Shainoor J Ismail; Kendra Hardy; Matthew C Tunis; Kelsey Young; Nadine Sicard; Caroline Quach
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Postlicensure herpes zoster vaccine effectiveness: systematic review protocol.

Authors:  James F Mbinta; Binh P Nguyen; Prosper Mandela A Awuni; Paul E Eme; Colin R Simpson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.