| Literature DB >> 29127881 |
Muhammad S Haider1, Mahantesh M Kurjogi1, M Khalil-Ur-Rehman1, Muhammad Fiaz1, Tariq Pervaiz1, Songtao Jiu1, Jia Haifeng1, Wang Chen1, Jinggui Fang2.
Abstract
Drought is a ubiquitous abiotic factor that severely impedes growth and development of horticulture crops. The challenge postured by global climate change is the evolution of drought-tolerant cultivars that could cope with concurrent stress. Hence, in this study, biochemical, physiological and transcriptome analysis were investigated in drought-treated grapevine leaves. The results revealed that photosynthetic activity and reducing sugars were significantly diminished which were positively correlated with low stomatal conductance and CO2 exchange in drought-stressed leaves. Further, the activities of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, and catalase were significantly actuated in the drought-responsive grapevine leaves. Similarly, the levels of abscisic acid and jasmonic acid were also significantly increased in the drought-stressed leaves. In transcriptome analysis, 12,451 differentially-expressed genes (DEGs) were annotated, out of which 8021 DEGs were up-regulated and 4430 DEGs were down-regulated in response to drought stress. In addition, the genes encoding pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) triggered immunity (PTI), including calcium signals, protein phosphatase 2C, calcineurin B-like proteins, MAPKs, and phosphorylation (FLS2 and MEKK1) cascades were up-regulated in response to drought stress. Several genes related to plant-pathogen interaction pathway (RPM1, PBS1, RPS5, RIN4, MIN7, PR1, and WRKYs) were also found up-regulated in response to drought stress. Overall the results of present study showed the dynamic interaction of DEG in grapevine physiology which provides the premise for selection of defense-related genes against drought stress for subsequent grapevine breeding programs.Entities:
Keywords: CDPK; Calcium signaling; Grapevine; MAPK-Signaling; Pathogen-related proteins; WRKY
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29127881 DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.10.026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Physiol Biochem ISSN: 0981-9428 Impact factor: 4.270