Literature DB >> 29127795

An investigation of the leaf retention capacity, efficiency and mechanism for atmospheric particulate matter of five greening tree species in Beijing, China.

Jinqiang Liu1, Zhiguo Cao2, Songyan Zou1, Huanhuan Liu1, Xiao Hai2, Shihua Wang2, Jie Duan3, Benye Xi4, Guangxuan Yan2, Shaowei Zhang5, Zhongkui Jia1.   

Abstract

Urban trees have the potential to reduce air pollution, but the retention capacity and efficiency of different tree species for atmospheric particulate matter (PM) accumulation and the underlying mechanism hasn't been well understood. To select tree species with high air purification abilities, the supplementing ultrasonic cleaning (UC) procedure was first introduced into the conventional leaf cleaning methods [single water cleaning (WC) or plus brush cleaning (BC)] for eluting the leaf-retained PM. Further updates to the methodology were applied to investigate the retention capacity, efficiency, and mechanism for PM of five typical greening tree species in Beijing, China. Meanwhile, the particle size distribution of PM on the leaves, the PM retention efficiencies of easily removable (ERP), difficult-to-remove (DRP) and totally removable (TRP) particles on the leaf (AEleaf), and the individual tree scales were estimated. The experimental leaf samples were collected from trees with similar sizes 4 (SDR) and 14days (LDR) after rainfall. When the leaves were cleaned by WC+BC, there was, on average, 29%-46% of the PM remaining on the leaves of different species, which could be removed almost completely if UC was supplemented. From SDR to LDR, the mass of the leaf-retained PM increased greatly, and the particle size distribution changed markedly for all species except for Sophorajaponica. Pinus tabuliformis retains particles with the largest average diameter (34.2μm), followed by Ginkgo biloba (20.5μm), Sabina chinensis (16.4μm), Salix babylonica (16.0μm), and S. japonica (13.1μm). S. japonica and S. chinensis had the highest AEleaf to retain the TRP and ERP of both PM1 and PM1-2.5, respectively. Conversely, S. babylonica and P. tabuliformis could retain both TRP and ERP of PM2.5-5 and PM5-10, and PM>10 and TSP with the highest AEleaf, respectively. In conclusion, our results could be useful in selecting greening tree species with high air purification abilities.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Particle diameter distribution; Particulate matter; Retention efficiency; Ultrasonic cleaning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29127795     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Resuspension of settled atmospheric particulate matter on plant leaves determined by wind and leaf surface characteristics.

Authors:  Guiling Zheng; Peng Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Effects of Foliar Trichomes on the Accumulation of Atmospheric Particulates in Tillandsia Brachycaulos.

Authors:  Ruiwen Zhang; Guiling Zheng; Peng Li
Journal:  Open Life Sci       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 0.938

3.  Magnetism and Grain-Size Distribution of Particles Deposited on the Surface of Urban Trees in Lanzhou City, Northwestern China.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Xiaochen Zhang; Chenming Gu; Mei Zhang; Yuanhao Zhao; Jia Jia
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-14       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Street Tree Planning to Improve Public Health and Ecosystem Resilience in Urban Areas: A Scenario Analysis Using a System Dynamics Model.

Authors:  Youngsun Seok; Hyosook Yim; Taehyeon Moon; Jinhyung Chon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Implications of Foliar Particulate Matter Deposition on the Physiology and Nutrient Allocation of Dominant Perennial Species of the Indo-Gangetic Plains.

Authors:  Harshita Singh; Pallavi Singh; Shashi Bhushan Agrawal; Madhoolika Agrawal
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 6.627

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.