Literature DB >> 29127686

The challenge of modeling protein assemblies: the CASP12-CAPRI experiment.

Marc F Lensink1, Sameer Velankar2, Minkyung Baek3, Lim Heo3, Chaok Seok3, Shoshana J Wodak4.   

Abstract

We present the quality assessment of 5613 models submitted by predictor groups from both CAPRI and CASP for the total of 15 most tractable targets from the second joint CASP-CAPRI protein assembly prediction experiment. These targets comprised 12 homo-oligomers and 3 hetero-complexes. The bulk of the analysis focuses on 10 targets (of CAPRI Round 37), which included all 3 hetero-complexes, and whose protein chains or the full assembly could be readily modeled from structural templates in the PDB. On average, 28 CAPRI groups and 10 CASP groups (including automatic servers), submitted models for each of these 10 targets. Additionally, about 16 groups participated in the CAPRI scoring experiments. A range of acceptable to high quality models were obtained for 6 of the 10 Round 37 targets, for which templates were available for the full assembly. Poorer results were achieved for the remaining targets due to the lower quality of the templates available for the full complex or the individual protein chains, highlighting the unmet challenge of modeling the structural adjustments of the protein components that occur upon binding or which must be accounted for in template-based modeling. On the other hand, our analysis indicated that residues in binding interfaces were correctly predicted in a sizable fraction of otherwise poorly modeled assemblies and this with higher accuracy than published methods that do not use information on the binding partner. Lastly, the strengths and weaknesses of the assessment methods are evaluated and improvements suggested.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAPRI; CASP; blind prediction; docking; oligomeric state; protein assemblies; protein complexes; protein-protein interaction; template-based modeling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29127686     DOI: 10.1002/prot.25419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  29 in total

1.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round XII.

Authors:  John Moult; Krzysztof Fidelis; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Torsten Schwede; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-12-15

2.  Integrating ab initio and template-based algorithms for protein-protein complex structure prediction.

Authors:  Sweta Vangaveti; Thom Vreven; Yang Zhang; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  HSYMDOCK: a docking web server for predicting the structure of protein homo-oligomers with Cn or Dn symmetry.

Authors:  Yumeng Yan; Huanyu Tao; Sheng-You Huang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  What method to use for protein-protein docking?

Authors:  Kathryn A Porter; Israel Desta; Dima Kozakov; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 6.809

5.  Performance and enhancement of the LZerD protein assembly pipeline in CAPRI 38-46.

Authors:  Charles Christoffer; Genki Terashi; Woong-Hee Shin; Tunde Aderinwale; Sai Raghavendra Maddhuri Venkata Subramaniya; Lenna Peterson; Jacob Verburgt; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-11-25

6.  Application of docking methodologies to modeled proteins.

Authors:  Amar Singh; Taras Dauzhenka; Petras J Kundrotas; Michael J E Sternberg; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2020-03-20

7.  Flexible docking of peptides to proteins using CABS-dock.

Authors:  Mateusz Kurcinski; Aleksandra Badaczewska-Dawid; Michal Kolinski; Andrzej Kolinski; Sebastian Kmiecik
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Protein docking model evaluation by 3D deep convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Xiao Wang; Genki Terashi; Charles W Christoffer; Mengmeng Zhu; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  VoroMQA web server for assessing three-dimensional structures of proteins and protein complexes.

Authors:  Kliment Olechnovič; Česlovas Venclovas
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Assessment of protein assembly prediction in CASP13.

Authors:  Dmytro Guzenko; Aleix Lafita; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Jose M Duarte
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.