Laura J Wilson1, Emma Cockburn2, Katherine Paice3, Scott Sinclair3, Tanwir Faki3, Frank A Hills4, Marcela B Gondek4, Alyssa Wood3, Lygeri Dimitriou3. 1. London Sports Institute, Middlesex University, Allianz Park, Greenlands Lane, London, NW4 1RL, UK. Laurawilson1@live.com. 2. School of Biomedical Science, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. 3. London Sports Institute, Middlesex University, Allianz Park, Greenlands Lane, London, NW4 1RL, UK. 4. Biomarker Research Group, Department of Natural Sciences, Middlesex University, London, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE:Cryotherapy is an increasingly popular recovery strategy used in an attempt to attenuate the negative impact of strenuous physical activity on subsequent exercise. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effects of whole body cryotherapy (WBC) and cold water immersion (CWI) on markers of recovery following a marathon. METHODS:Thirty-one endurance trained males completed a marathon. Participants were randomly assigned to a CWI, WBC or placebo group. Perceptions of muscle soreness, training stress and markers of muscle function were recorded before the marathon and at 24 and 48 h post exercise. Blood samples were taken at baseline, post intervention and 24 and 48 h post intervention to assess inflammation and muscle damage. RESULTS:WBC had a harmful effect on muscle function compared to CWI post marathon. WBC positively influenced perceptions of training stress compared to CWI. With the exception of C-reactive protein (CRP) at 24 and 48 h, neither cryotherapy intervention positively influenced blood borne markers of inflammation or structural damage compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: The findings show WBC has a negative impact on muscle function, perceptions of soreness and a number of blood parameters compared to CWI, contradicting the suggestion that WBC may be a superior recovery strategy. Further, cryotherapy is no more effective than a placebo intervention at improving functional recovery or perceptions of training stress following a marathon. These findings lend further evidence to suggest that treatment belief and the placebo effect may be largely responsible for the beneficial effects of cryotherapy on recovery following a marathon.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Cryotherapy is an increasingly popular recovery strategy used in an attempt to attenuate the negative impact of strenuous physical activity on subsequent exercise. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effects of whole body cryotherapy (WBC) and cold water immersion (CWI) on markers of recovery following a marathon. METHODS: Thirty-one endurance trained males completed a marathon. Participants were randomly assigned to a CWI, WBC or placebo group. Perceptions of muscle soreness, training stress and markers of muscle function were recorded before the marathon and at 24 and 48 h post exercise. Blood samples were taken at baseline, post intervention and 24 and 48 h post intervention to assess inflammation and muscle damage. RESULTS: WBC had a harmful effect on muscle function compared to CWI post marathon. WBC positively influenced perceptions of training stress compared to CWI. With the exception of C-reactive protein (CRP) at 24 and 48 h, neither cryotherapy intervention positively influenced blood borne markers of inflammation or structural damage compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: The findings show WBC has a negative impact on muscle function, perceptions of soreness and a number of blood parameters compared to CWI, contradicting the suggestion that WBC may be a superior recovery strategy. Further, cryotherapy is no more effective than a placebo intervention at improving functional recovery or perceptions of training stress following a marathon. These findings lend further evidence to suggest that treatment belief and the placebo effect may be largely responsible for the beneficial effects of cryotherapy on recovery following a marathon.
Authors: C J de Ruiter; R M van der Linden; M J A van der Zijden; A P Hollander; A de Haan Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2002-11-09 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: G Howatson; M P McHugh; J A Hill; J Brouner; A P Jewell; K A van Someren; R E Shave; S A Howatson Journal: Scand J Med Sci Sports Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 4.221
Authors: Joseph T Costello; Philip R A Baker; Geoffrey M Minett; Francois Bieuzen; Ian B Stewart; Chris Bleakley Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-09-18
Authors: Thimo Wiewelhove; Christoph Schneider; Alexander Döweling; Florian Hanakam; Christian Rasche; Tim Meyer; Michael Kellmann; Mark Pfeiffer; Alexander Ferrauti Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-11-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mathilde Poignard; Gaël Guilhem; Quentin de Larochelambert; Bernard Montalvan; François Bieuzen Journal: Front Sports Act Living Date: 2020-09-02
Authors: Erich Hohenauer; Joseph T Costello; Tom Deliens; Peter Clarys; Rahel Stoop; Ron Clijsen Journal: Scand J Med Sci Sports Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 4.221
Authors: Agnieszka Zembron-Lacny; Barbara Morawin; Edyta Wawrzyniak-Gramacka; Jaroslaw Gramacki; Pawel Jarmuzek; Dariusz Kotlega; Ewa Ziemann Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 3.390