Literature DB >> 29125804

Acceptance and perceived usefulness of robots to assist with activities of daily living and healthcare tasks.

Amanda K Hall1, Uba Backonja1, Ian Painter2, Maya Cakmak3, Minjung Sung4, Timothy Lau5, Hilaire J Thompson6, George Demiris1.   

Abstract

As the number of older adults living with chronic conditions continues to rise, they will require assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) and healthcare tasks to continue living independently in their homes. One proposed solution to assist with the care needs of an aging population and a shrinking healthcare workforce is robotic technology. Using a cross-sectional survey design, we purposively sampled adults (≥18 years old) to assess generational acceptance and perceived usefulness of robots to assist with ADLs, healthcare tasks, and evaluate acceptance of robotic healthcare assistance across different settings. A total of 499 adults (age range [years] 18-98, Mean = 38.7, SD = 22.7) responded to the survey. Significant differences were found among young, middle-aged, and older adults on perceived usefulness of robots for cleaning, escorting them around town, acting as companionship, delivering meals, assessing sadness and calling for help, providing medical advice, taking vital sign assessments, and assisting with personal care (p < 0.05). The majority of younger adults reported that they would like a robot to provide healthcare assistance in the hospital, compared to middle-aged and older adults (p < 0.001). Results of this study can guide the design of robots to assist adults of all ages with useful tasks.

Keywords:  activities of daily living; older adults; robotics

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29125804     DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2017.1396565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assist Technol        ISSN: 1040-0435


  6 in total

1.  Comfort and Attitudes Towards Robots Among Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Uba Backonja; Amanda K Hall; Ian Painter; Laura Kneale; Amanda Lazar; Maya Cakmak; Hilaire J Thompson; George Demiris
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.176

Review 2.  Biomedical soft robots: current status and perspective.

Authors:  T Ashuri; A Armani; R Jalilzadeh Hamidi; T Reasnor; S Ahmadi; K Iqbal
Journal:  Biomed Eng Lett       Date:  2020-05-28

3.  Robotic technology for palliative and supportive care: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.

Authors:  Amara Callistus Nwosu; Bethany Sturgeon; Tamsin McGlinchey; Christian Dg Goodwin; Ardhendu Behera; Stephen Mason; Sarah Stanley; Terry R Payne
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 4.762

4.  An analysis of usability evaluation practices and contexts of use in wearable robotics.

Authors:  Jan Thomas Meyer; Roger Gassert; Olivier Lambercy
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Health Promotion, Health Literacy and Vaccine Hesitancy: The Role of Humanoid Robots.

Authors:  Christine McIntosh; Anne Elvin; Wendy Smyth; Melanie Birks; Cate Nagle
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

6.  Study protocol: a survey exploring patients' and healthcare professionals' expectations, attitudes and ethical acceptability regarding the integration of socially assistive humanoid robots in nursing.

Authors:  Izidor Mlakar; Tadej Kampič; Vojko Flis; Nina Kobilica; Maja Molan; Urška Smrke; Nejc Plohl; Andrej Bergauer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.