| Literature DB >> 29125585 |
Shunsuke Doi1,2, Hiroo Ide3, Koichi Takeuchi4, Shinsuke Fujita5, Katsuhiko Takabayashi6.
Abstract
Accessibility to healthcare service providers, the quantity, and the quality of them are important for national health. In this study, we focused on geographic accessibility to estimate and evaluate future demand and supply of healthcare services. We constructed a simulation model called the patient access area model (PAAM), which simulates patients' access time to healthcare service institutions using a geographic information system (GIS). Using this model, to evaluate the balance of future healthcare services demand and supply in small areas, we estimated the number of inpatients every five years in each area and compared it with the number of hospital beds within a one-hour drive from each area. In an experiment with the Tokyo metropolitan area as a target area, when we assumed hospital bed availability to be 80%, it was predicted that over 78,000 inpatients would not receive inpatient care in 2030. However, this number would decrease if we lowered the rate of inpatient care by 10% and the average length of the hospital stay. Using this model, recommendations can be made regarding what action should be undertaken and by when to prevent a dramatic increase in healthcare demand. This method can help plan the geographical resource allocation in healthcare services for healthcare policy.Entities:
Keywords: estimation; geographic information systems; health services demand; health services geographic accessibility
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29125585 PMCID: PMC5708006 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14111367
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Approach of the PAAM.
Figure 2Simulation flow of selection of medical institution to be consulted by a patient.
Scenario and parameter setting value of each experiment.
| Experiment No. | Scenario Name | Rate of Inpatient Care | Average Length of Hospital Stays | Hospital Bed Utilization Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ex.1 | Current projection | ±0% | ±0% | 80% |
| Ex.2 | 5% Improvement scenario | −5% | −5% | 85% |
| Ex.3 | 10% Improvement scenario | −10% | −10% | 90% |
Regarding the rate of inpatient care and average length of hospital stay, the ratio of each cohort group (by prefecture/sex/age group of population) in comparison to current values are shown.
Figure 3Estimated number of future patients.
Figure 4Estimated number of over-demand.
Figure 5Estimated number of over-supply.
Figure 6Estimated number of over-demand in each mesh (Ex.1).
Figure 7Estimated number of over-demand in each mesh (Ex.2).
Figure 8Estimated number of over-demand in each mesh (Ex.3).