Soha Sobhy1, Kuhan Dharmarajah2, David Arroyo-Manzano3, Ramesan Navanatnarajah4, James Noblet5, Javier Zamora1,3,6, Shakila Thangaratinam1,6. 1. a Women's Health Research Unit, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry , Queen Mary University of London , London , UK. 2. d Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , University College London Hospital , London, UK. 3. b Clinical Biostatistics Unit , Hospital Ramon y Cajal (IRYCIS, CIBERESP) , Madrid , Spain. 4. f Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , Barts Health NHS Trust , London, UK. 5. e Department of Anaesthesia , Barts Health NHS Trust. 6. c Multidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub (mEsh), Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry , Queen Mary University of London , London , UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Delivery is often expedited with cesarean section, necessitating anesthesia, to prevent complications in women with preeclampsia. Anesthesia-associated risks in these women from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are not known. METHODS: We searched major databases (until February 2017) for studies on general vs. regional anesthesia in women with preeclampsia. We summarized the association between outcomes and type of anesthesia using a random effects model and reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). FINDINGS: We included 14 studies (10,411 pregnancies). General anesthesia was associated with an increase in the odds of maternal death sevenfold (OR 7.70, 95% CI 1.9 to 31.0, I2 = 58%) than regional anesthesia. The odds of pulmonary edema (OR 5.16, 95% CI 2.5 to 10.4, I2 = 0%), maternal intensive care unit admissions (OR 16.25, 95% CI 9.0 to 29.5, I2 = 65%), and perinatal death (OR 3.01, 95% CI 1.4 to 6.5, I2 = 56%) were increased with general vs. regional anesthesia. CONCLUSION: General anesthesia is associated with increased complications in women with preeclampsia undergoing cesarean section in LMIC.
BACKGROUND: Delivery is often expedited with cesarean section, necessitating anesthesia, to prevent complications in women with preeclampsia. Anesthesia-associated risks in these women from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are not known. METHODS: We searched major databases (until February 2017) for studies on general vs. regional anesthesia in women with preeclampsia. We summarized the association between outcomes and type of anesthesia using a random effects model and reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). FINDINGS: We included 14 studies (10,411 pregnancies). General anesthesia was associated with an increase in the odds of maternal death sevenfold (OR 7.70, 95% CI 1.9 to 31.0, I2 = 58%) than regional anesthesia. The odds of pulmonary edema (OR 5.16, 95% CI 2.5 to 10.4, I2 = 0%), maternal intensive care unit admissions (OR 16.25, 95% CI 9.0 to 29.5, I2 = 65%), and perinatal death (OR 3.01, 95% CI 1.4 to 6.5, I2 = 56%) were increased with general vs. regional anesthesia. CONCLUSION: General anesthesia is associated with increased complications in women with preeclampsia undergoing cesarean section in LMIC.