Literature DB >> 29124760

Indications and methodology for video-electroencephalographic studies in the epilepsy monitoring unit.

Jerry J Shih1, Nathan B Fountain2, Susan T Herman3, Anto Bagic4, Fred Lado5, Susan Arnold6, Mary L Zupanc7, Ellen Riker8, David M Labiner9.   

Abstract

Although the epilepsy and neurology communities have position papers on a number of topics pertaining to epilepsy diagnosis and management, no current paper exists for the rationale and appropriate indications for epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) evaluation. General neurologists, hospital administrators, and insurers also have yet to fully understand the role this type of testing has in the diagnosis and management of individuals with paroxysmal neurologic symptoms. This review outlines the indications for long-term video-electroencephalography (VEEG) for typical elective admissions to a specialized inpatient setting. The common techniques used in EMUs to obtain diagnostic information are reviewed. The added benefit of safety measures and clinical testing above that available for routine or long-term ambulatory electroencephalography is also discussed. The indications for admission to the EMU include differential diagnosis of paroxysmal spells, characterization of seizure types, presurgical epilepsy evaluations, seizure quantification, monitoring medication adjustment in a safe setting, and differentiation between seizures and side effects. We conclude that the appropriate use of this specialized testing can lead to an early and correct diagnosis in a variety of clinical circumstances. The EMU evaluation is considered the gold standard test for the definitive diagnosis of epilepsy and seizure-like spells. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
© 2017 International League Against Epilepsy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epilepsy monitoring; epilepsy surgery; inpatient specialized testing; nonepileptic events

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29124760     DOI: 10.1111/epi.13938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  6 in total

1.  The clinical utility of non-invasive video-electroencephalographic monitoring has been diversifying.

Authors:  Yong Won Cho; Gholam K Motamedi; Keun Tae Kim
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Assessment of the Predictive Value of Outpatient Smartphone Videos for Diagnosis of Epileptic Seizures.

Authors:  William O Tatum; Lawrence J Hirsch; Michael A Gelfand; Emily K Acton; W Curt LaFrance; Robert B Duckrow; David K Chen; Andrew S Blum; John D Hixson; Joe F Drazkowski; Selim R Benbadis; Gregory D Cascino
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 18.302

3.  Improving Diagnostic Processes in the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit: A Team Endeavor.

Authors:  Churl-Su Kwon; Nathalie Jetté
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2021-04

4.  Developing and Implementing a Standardized Ictal Examination in the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit.

Authors:  Susanna S O'Kula; Lisa Faillace; Catherine V Kulick-Soper; Sahily Reyes-Esteves; Jackie Raab; Kathryn A Davis; Ammar Kheder; Chloe E Hill
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2021-04

5.  Utilization of Epilepsy Monitoring Unit by General Neurologists.

Authors:  Shahram Izadyar; Amr Ewida; Elena M Kleinhenz; Victoria Titoff
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-22

6.  Seizure detection using wearable sensors and machine learning: Setting a benchmark.

Authors:  Jianbin Tang; Rima El Atrache; Shuang Yu; Umar Asif; Michele Jackson; Subhrajit Roy; Mahtab Mirmomeni; Sarah Cantley; Theodore Sheehan; Sarah Schubach; Claire Ufongene; Solveig Vieluf; Christian Meisel; Stefan Harrer; Tobias Loddenkemper
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 5.864

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.