PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on sleep and functional capacity to exercise in subjects with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: This is a controlled, randomized, double-blind study conducted in 16 OSA patients divided into two groups: training (IMT: n = 8) and placebo-IMT (P-IMT: n = 8). IMT was conducted during 12 weeks with a moderate load (50-60% of maximal inspiratory pressure-MIP), while P-IMT used a load < 20% of MPI. Total daily IMT time for both groups was 30 min, 7 days per week, twice a day. RESULTS: There was no difference comparing IMT to P-IMT group after training for lung function (p > 0.05) and respiratory muscle strength (p > 0.05). Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2Max) was not significantly different between IMT and P-IMT group (mean difference - 1.76, confidence interval (CI) - 7.93 to 4.41, p = 0.71). The same was observed for the other ventilatory and cardiometabolic variables measured (p > 0.05). A significant improvement in sleep quality was found when Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) values of IMT and P-IMT group after training were compared (mean difference: 3.7, confidence interval 95% (CI95%) 0.6 to 6.9, p = 0.02) but no significant changes were seen in daytime sleepiness between both groups after the intervention (mean difference: 3.4, CI 95%: - 3.3 to 10.0; p = 0.29). CONCLUSION: According to these results, 12 weeks of moderate load IMT resulted in improved sleep quality, but there were no significant repercussions on functional capacity to exercise or excessive daytime sleepiness.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on sleep and functional capacity to exercise in subjects with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: This is a controlled, randomized, double-blind study conducted in 16 OSA patients divided into two groups: training (IMT: n = 8) and placebo-IMT (P-IMT: n = 8). IMT was conducted during 12 weeks with a moderate load (50-60% of maximal inspiratory pressure-MIP), while P-IMT used a load < 20% of MPI. Total daily IMT time for both groups was 30 min, 7 days per week, twice a day. RESULTS: There was no difference comparing IMT to P-IMT group after training for lung function (p > 0.05) and respiratory muscle strength (p > 0.05). Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2Max) was not significantly different between IMT and P-IMT group (mean difference - 1.76, confidence interval (CI) - 7.93 to 4.41, p = 0.71). The same was observed for the other ventilatory and cardiometabolic variables measured (p > 0.05). A significant improvement in sleep quality was found when Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) values of IMT and P-IMT group after training were compared (mean difference: 3.7, confidence interval 95% (CI95%) 0.6 to 6.9, p = 0.02) but no significant changes were seen in daytime sleepiness between both groups after the intervention (mean difference: 3.4, CI 95%: - 3.3 to 10.0; p = 0.29). CONCLUSION: According to these results, 12 weeks of moderate load IMT resulted in improved sleep quality, but there were no significant repercussions on functional capacity to exercise or excessive daytime sleepiness.
Authors: R J Gibbons; G J Balady; J W Beasley; J T Bricker; W F Duvernoy; V F Froelicher; D B Mark; T H Marwick; B D McCallister; P D Thompson; W L Winters; F G Yanowitz; J L Ritchie; R J Gibbons; M D Cheitlin; K A Eagle; T J Gardner; A Garson; R P Lewis; R A O'Rourke; T J Ryan Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Christopher E Kline; E Patrick Crowley; Gary B Ewing; James B Burch; Steven N Blair; J Larry Durstine; J Mark Davis; Shawn D Youngstedt Journal: Sleep Date: 2011-12-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Isabela M B S Pessoa; Miguel Houri Neto; Dayane Montemezzo; Luisa A M Silva; Armèle Dornelas De Andrade; Verônica F Parreira Journal: Braz J Phys Ther Date: 2014-09-12 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Carlos Alberto de Castro Pereira; Andrezza Araujo Oliveira Duarte; Andrea Gimenez; Maria Raquel Soares Journal: J Bras Pneumol Date: 2014 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.624
Authors: José Carlos Nogueira Nóbrega-Júnior; Armèle Dornelas de Andrade; Erika Alves Marinho de Andrade; Maria do Amparo Andrade; Alice Santana Valadares Ribeiro; Rodrigo Pinto Pedrosa; Ana Paula de Lima Ferreira; Anna Myrna Jaguaribe de Lima Journal: Nat Sci Sleep Date: 2020-12-02
Authors: Sílvia Thamilis Barbosa Pessoa Ferreira; Maria do Socorro Brasileiro-Santos; Juliana Baptista Teixeira; Michelle Christiane da Silva Rabello; Virgínia Maria Barros de Lorena; Breno Quintella Farah; Thayse Neves Santos Silva; Anna Myrna Jaguaribe de Lima Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2021-04-05 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Beatrix Krause-Sorio; Eunjoo An; Andrea P Aguila; Fernando Martinez; Ravi S Aysola; Paul M Macey Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2021-11-04 Impact factor: 4.755
Authors: L M de Azeredo; L C de Souza; B L S Guimarães; F P Puga; N S C S Behrens; J R Lugon Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res Date: 2022-10-03 Impact factor: 2.904