Literature DB >> 29123997

Noise levels and sound pollution associated with various operative procedures and equipments in a pediatric dental environment-A clinical study.

Mousumi Goswami1, Darrel Singh1, Binny Vashist1, Sugandha Marwaha1.   

Abstract

AIM: To analyse sound levels and sound pollution in a Pediatric Dental Clinic and to analyse whether the levels are significant to the extent of being a health hazard.
METHODS: Noise levels were measured in a Pediatric dental clinic in an institutional setting with a precision noise level meter ((HTC 1350). Recordings were taken at different times of the day, at the centre, chair-side, reception, play area and four corners of the department keeping the microphone at a distance of 6 in. from the operator's ear. The noise levels of various equipments i.e. suction, micromotor, airotor were measured with the equipments turned on and during cutting operations with the microphone placed at a distance of 6 in. from the sound source. The sound levels for the laboratory equipments were taken at a distance of 6 in. and 2 m.
RESULTS: The highest mean sound levels were recorded at the reception, play area and chair-side area with least mean sound levels recorded at 9:00am which increased at 11:30am & 2:00pm and reduced again at 3:30pm The maximum sounds were produced by the lathe trimmer, airotor and scaler.
CONCLUSION: Noise levels in a pediatric clinic approach the level of risk of hearing loss [85 db(A)]. This would have a serious effect on both providers and patients and a concerted effort would be required to control the noise levels and thus avoid the potential health hazards that it poses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health hazards; Noise level; Sound level meter; Sound pollution

Year:  2017        PMID: 29123997      PMCID: PMC5670304          DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2017.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res        ISSN: 2212-4268


  10 in total

1.  Noise levels encountered in dental clinical and laboratory practice.

Authors:  J C Setcos; A Mahyuddin
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.681

2.  Assessment of noise exposures in a pediatric dentistry residency clinic.

Authors:  Khaled Jadid; Ulrich Klein; Deanna Meinke
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.874

3.  Evaluation of behavior management technology dissemination in pediatric dentistry.

Authors:  K D Allen; R T Stanley; K McPherson
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  1990 Apr-May       Impact factor: 1.874

4.  Assessment of noise-reducing devices for the dental office personnel.

Authors:  C M Stanford; P L Fan; J W Stanford
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 1.677

5.  Protect your hearing. Dental office sounds may be hazardous to your health.

Authors:  F J Miranda
Journal:  J Okla Dent Assoc       Date:  1985

6.  Decibel ratings of dental office sounds.

Authors:  H C Kilpatrick
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  Comparison of anxiety levels associated with noise in the dental clinic among children of age group 6-15 years.

Authors:  Radhika Muppa; Prameela Bhupatiraju; Mahesh Duddu; Narendra Varma Penumatsa; Arthi Dandempally; Priyanka Panthula
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.867

Review 8.  Noise exposure and public health.

Authors:  W Passchier-Vermeer; W F Passchier
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Noise levels of dental equipment used in dental college of Damascus University.

Authors:  Mhd Loutify Qsaibati; Ousama Ibrahim
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2014-11

10.  Noise exposure assessment in a dental school.

Authors:  Thitiworn Choosong; Wandee Kaimook; Ratchada Tantisarasart; Puwanai Sooksamear; Satith Chayaphum; Chanon Kongkamol; Wisarut Srisintorn; Pitchaya Phakthongsuk
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2011-12-05
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Effect of Titrated Exposure to Non-Traumatic Noise on Unvoiced Speech Recognition in Human Listeners with Normal Audiological Profiles.

Authors:  Mengchao Zhang; Richard M Stern; Deborah Moncrieff; Catherine Palmer; Christopher A Brown
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.