Maha Louriz1,2, Jihane Belayachi1,2, Naoufal Madani1,2, Khalid Abidi2,3, Tarek Dendane2,3, Abdellatif Belabes Benchekroun2,4, Amine Ali Zeggwagh2,3, Redouane Abouqal1,2,5. 1. Medical Emergency Department Ibn Sina University Hospital Rabat Morocco. 2. Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy Mohammed V University Rabat Morocco. 3. Medical Intensive Care Unit Ibn Sina University Hospital Rabat Morocco. 4. Surgical Emergency Department Ibn Sina University Hospital Rabat Morocco. 5. Laboratory of Biostatistics Clinical and Epidemiological Research Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy Mohammed V University Rabat Morocco.
Abstract
Aim: To describe pain management practices in Moroccan emergency departments, and to identify perceived barriers among emergency department physicians regarding pain management. Methods: Eleven Moroccan emergency departments participated in the study. A nationwide survey was administered to physicians. The questionnaire covered physicians' characteristics, practices regarding pain management, and the perceived barriers to pain control. Results: A total of 86 questionnaires were analyzed. The participants' mean age was 41±7 years and 59.3% had more than 10 years working experience in emergency departments. The majority of participants were general physicians (87.2%) with no pain education (73.3%). Pain assessment in emergency departments was carried out by 59.3% of the physicians. Simple interrogatory assessment was the main tool (88.3%) with poor use of algometric scales (11.7%). Pain assessment results were not recorded in clinical charts in 93% of cases. Pain reassessment after treatment was carried out by 23.2% of respondents. Physicians had opiophobia in 80.2% of cases. None of the Moroccan emergency departments participating in the study have a written protocol for pain management. Barriers relating to medical staff and the health care system were the most commonly encountered hindrances that preclude emergency department physicians from proper pain management. Conclusions: Despite the availability of international guidelines, pain management practices are still sub-optimal in Moroccan emergency departments.
Aim: To describe pain management practices in Moroccan emergency departments, and to identify perceived barriers among emergency department physicians regarding pain management. Methods: Eleven Moroccan emergency departments participated in the study. A nationwide survey was administered to physicians. The questionnaire covered physicians' characteristics, practices regarding pain management, and the perceived barriers to pain control. Results: A total of 86 questionnaires were analyzed. The participants' mean age was 41±7 years and 59.3% had more than 10 years working experience in emergency departments. The majority of participants were general physicians (87.2%) with no pain education (73.3%). Pain assessment in emergency departments was carried out by 59.3% of the physicians. Simple interrogatory assessment was the main tool (88.3%) with poor use of algometric scales (11.7%). Pain assessment results were not recorded in clinical charts in 93% of cases. Pain reassessment after treatment was carried out by 23.2% of respondents. Physicians had opiophobia in 80.2% of cases. None of the Moroccan emergency departments participating in the study have a written protocol for pain management. Barriers relating to medical staff and the health care system were the most commonly encountered hindrances that preclude emergency department physicians from proper pain management. Conclusions: Despite the availability of international guidelines, pain management practices are still sub-optimal in Moroccan emergency departments.
Authors: Hyun Jung Jho; Yeol Kim; Kyung Ae Kong; Dae Hyun Kim; Jin Young Choi; Eun Jeong Nam; Jin Young Choi; Sujin Koh; Kwan Ok Hwang; Sun Kyung Baek; Eun Jung Park Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-08-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sarah Bertrand; Gabriel Meynet; Patrick Taffé; Vincent Della Santa; Daniel Fishman; Yvan Fournier; Vincent Frochaux; Vincent Ribordy; Olivier T Rutschmann; Olivier Hugli Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-03-25 Impact factor: 4.241