Jun-Ichi Hirata1, Munehiko Ohya1, Keiji Kumon1. 1. Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine Kinki University Faculty of Medicine Nara Hospital Nara Japan.
Abstract
Case: A 37-year-old woman was admitted to the emergency room with bilateral periorbital edema, hypotension, and expiratory stridor that developed 30 min after starting to hang out washing following consumption of a jam bun. Despite no food allergies or similar episodes, she had recently developed facial wheals after bathing. Outcome: She was immediately and repeatedly administered adrenalin and succinic acid hydrocortisone sodium for wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis. On the third hospital day, radioallergosorbent testing reactions to wheat, gluten, and omega-5 gliadin were mildly positive; skin-prick tests for hydrolyzed wheat protein and a face-wash challenge were positive. Therefore, we diagnosed hydrolyzed wheat protein wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis. Despite advising her about hyposensitization, the episode recurred and an adrenalin auto-injector was prescribed. Conclusion: Differentiating hydrolyzed wheat protein wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis from conventional wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis is important owing to their severity and similarities. Each requires long-term management of patients' etiological conditions by advising them about hyposensitization and prescribing adrenalin auto-injectors.
Case: A 37-year-old woman was admitted to the emergency room with bilateral periorbital edema, hypotension, and expiratory stridor that developed 30 min after starting to hang out washing following consumption of a jam bun. Despite no food allergies or similar episodes, she had recently developed facial wheals after bathing. Outcome: She was immediately and repeatedly administered adrenalin and succinic acid hydrocortisone sodium for wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis. On the third hospital day, radioallergosorbent testing reactions to wheat, gluten, and omega-5 gliadin were mildly positive; skin-prick tests for hydrolyzed wheat protein and a face-wash challenge were positive. Therefore, we diagnosed hydrolyzed wheat protein wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis. Despite advising her about hyposensitization, the episode recurred and an adrenalin auto-injector was prescribed. Conclusion: Differentiating hydrolyzed wheat protein wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis from conventional wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis is important owing to their severity and similarities. Each requires long-term management of patients' etiological conditions by advising them about hyposensitization and prescribing adrenalin auto-injectors.