Christopher Labos1, James M Brophy2, George Davey Smith2, Allan D Sniderman2, George Thanassoulis2. 1. From the Preventive and Genomic Cardiology, Division of Cardiology, McGill University Health Centre and Research Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada (C.L., J.M.B., A.D.S., G.T.); Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada (J.M.B.); and MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, United Kingdom (G.D.S.). christopher.labos@mail.mcgill.ca. 2. From the Preventive and Genomic Cardiology, Division of Cardiology, McGill University Health Centre and Research Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada (C.L., J.M.B., A.D.S., G.T.); Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada (J.M.B.); and MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, United Kingdom (G.D.S.).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To reanalyze data from recent randomized trials of statins to assess whether the benefits and risks of statins are mediated primarily via their LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) lowering effects or via other mechanisms. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We adapted Egger regression, a technique frequently used in Mendelian randomization studies to detect genetic pleiotropy, to reanalyze the available randomized control trial data of statin therapy. For cardiovascular end points, each 1 mmol/L change in LDL-C with statin therapy was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.84) with an intercept that was indistinguishable from zero (intercept, -0.0032; [95% confidence interval, -0.090 to 0.084]; P=0.94), indicating no pleiotropy. For incident diabetes mellitus, a 1 mmol/L change in LDL-C with statin therapy was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.07 (95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.16) and an intercept nondistinguishable from zero (intercept, -0.015; [95% confidence interval, -0.30 to 0.27]; P=0.91), again indicating no pleiotropy. CONCLUSIONS: Our reanalysis of the randomized control trial data using Egger regression adds to the existing evidence that the cardiovascular benefits of statins and their association with incident diabetes mellitus are mediated primarily, if not entirely, via their LDL-C lowering properties rather than by any pleiotropic effects.
OBJECTIVE: To reanalyze data from recent randomized trials of statins to assess whether the benefits and risks of statins are mediated primarily via their LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) lowering effects or via other mechanisms. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We adapted Egger regression, a technique frequently used in Mendelian randomization studies to detect genetic pleiotropy, to reanalyze the available randomized control trial data of statin therapy. For cardiovascular end points, each 1 mmol/L change in LDL-C with statin therapy was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.84) with an intercept that was indistinguishable from zero (intercept, -0.0032; [95% confidence interval, -0.090 to 0.084]; P=0.94), indicating no pleiotropy. For incident diabetes mellitus, a 1 mmol/L change in LDL-C with statin therapy was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.07 (95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.16) and an intercept nondistinguishable from zero (intercept, -0.015; [95% confidence interval, -0.30 to 0.27]; P=0.91), again indicating no pleiotropy. CONCLUSIONS: Our reanalysis of the randomized control trial data using Egger regression adds to the existing evidence that the cardiovascular benefits of statins and their association with incident diabetes mellitus are mediated primarily, if not entirely, via their LDL-C lowering properties rather than by any pleiotropic effects.
Authors: Michael V Holmes; Tom G Richardson; Brian A Ference; Neil M Davies; George Davey Smith Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Roelof A J Smit; Stella Trompet; Aaron Leong; Mark O Goodarzi; Iris Postmus; Helen Warren; Elizabeth Theusch; Michael R Barnes; Benoit J Arsenault; Xiaohui Li; QiPing Feng; Daniel I Chasman; L Adrienne Cupples; Graham A Hitman; Ronald M Krauss; Bruce M Psaty; Jerome I Rotter; Saskia le Cessie; C Michael Stein; J Wouter Jukema Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2019-12-05 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: Allison B Reiss; Hirra A Arain; Lora J Kasselman; Heather A Renna; Juan Zhen; Iryna Voloshyna; Joshua DeLeon; Steven E Carsons; Michelle Petri Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Date: 2019-08-21 Impact factor: 2.430