Literature DB >> 29122748

Infographic: ACL injury reconstruction and recovery.

R M Queen1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29122748      PMCID: PMC5717074          DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.611.BJR-2017-0330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint Res        ISSN: 2046-3758            Impact factor:   5.853


× No keyword cloud information.
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a considerable source of morbidity among athletes. Most ACL injuries (70%) are non-contact in nature, with women and patients aged between 15 and 30 years at particularly high risk.[1,2] The vast majority of patients undergo surgical reconstruction, with annual costs associated with treatment and rehabilitation of ACL injuries estimated at $3 billion. While the risk of primary ACL injury has been studied extensively, there is limited understanding of the risk factors for secondary ACL injuries, and how these are related to return-to-play (RTP) assessments. RTP decisions often do not rely on objective measures of function, but are instead based on the time since surgical intervention.[3,4] However, many athletes have residual muscle imbalances, muscle weakness, and altered lower extremity mechanics at the time of RTP that may persist for up to two years following ACL reconstruction.[5,6] With the current return to sport decision metrics, up to 29% of all ACL reconstruction patients will suffer a secondary tear. The identified risk factors for secondary ACL injury have been focused on deficits in movement mechanics. Specifically, movement and loading asymmetry (knee extension moment asymmetry) between the surgical and non-surgical limbs, as well as an increase in frontal plane range of motion, have been identified as secondary ACL injury risk factors.[7] Based on the increased risk for secondary ACL tears, and the knowledge that 45% of individuals will develop knee osteoarthritis within ten years of an ACL reconstruction, it is imperative that objective and measurable criteria are used when determining readiness to return to sports in order to decrease the risk of a secondary injury.[8]
  8 in total

Review 1.  Objective criteria for return to athletics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and subsequent reinjury rates: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sue D Barber-Westin; Frank R Noyes
Journal:  Phys Sportsmed       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 2.  Factors used to determine return to unrestricted sports activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Sue D Barber-Westin; Frank R Noyes
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Biomechanical measures during landing and postural stability predict second anterior cruciate ligament injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sport.

Authors:  Mark V Paterno; Laura C Schmitt; Kevin R Ford; Mitchell J Rauh; Gregory D Myer; Bin Huang; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in adolescent patients: limb asymmetry and functional knee bracing.

Authors:  Boyi Dai; Robert J Butler; William E Garrett; Robin M Queen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  High prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, pain, and functional limitations in female soccer players twelve years after anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  L S Lohmander; A Ostenberg; M Englund; H Roos
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-10

6.  Return to play and future ACL injury risk after ACL reconstruction in soccer athletes from the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) group.

Authors:  Robert H Brophy; Leah Schmitz; Rick W Wright; Warren R Dunn; Richard D Parker; Jack T Andrish; Eric C McCarty; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Incidence of subsequent injury to either knee within 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft.

Authors:  K Donald Shelbourne; Tinker Gray; Marc Haro
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 8.  Maximizing quadriceps strength after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Riann M Palmieri-Smith; Abbey C Thomas; Edward M Wojtys
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.182

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  In Situ Joint Stiffness Increases During Skeletal Growth but Decreases Following Partial and Complete Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

Authors:  Stephanie G Cone; Jorge A Piedrahita; Jeffrey T Spang; Matthew Fisher
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Size and Shape of the Human Anterior Cruciate Ligament and the Impact of Sex and Skeletal Growth: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Stephanie G Cone; Danielle Howe; Matthew B Fisher
Journal:  JBJS Rev       Date:  2019-06

3.  Tissue-specific changes in size and shape of the ligaments and tendons of the porcine knee during post-natal growth.

Authors:  Stephanie G Cone; Hope E Piercy; Emily P Lambeth; Hongyu Ru; Jorge A Piedrahita; Jeffrey T Spang; Lynn A Fordham; Matthew B Fisher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The anterolateral ligament is a secondary stabilizer in the knee joint: A validated computational model of the biomechanical effects of a deficient anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament on knee joint kinematics.

Authors:  Kyoung-Tak Kang; Yong-Gon Koh; Kyoung-Mi Park; Chong-Hyuck Choi; Min Jung; Jucheol Shin; Sung-Hwan Kim
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 5.853

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.