Literature DB >> 29122600

Width and depth of resection for small colorectal polyps: hot versus cold snare polypectomy.

Sho Suzuki1, Takuji Gotoda1, Chika Kusano1, Hisatomo Ikehara2, Akihiro Sugita3, Misa Yamauchi3, Mitsuhiko Moriyama1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Curability is associated with resection width and depth in polypectomy. We evaluated the resection width and depth achieved with hot snare polypectomy (HSP) and cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for small colorectal polyps.
METHODS: In this single-center, prospective, randomized controlled study, patients with rectal or rectosigmoid polyps ≤10 mm in diameter were treated with HSP or CSP. Resection width was evaluated as mucosal defect size, measured immediately postprocedure and 1 day later. Resection depth was histologically evaluated using obtained specimens.
RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were enrolled. Mean lesion size was 5.6 mm with HSP (n = 27) and 5.8 mm with CSP (n = 25). Mean mucosal defect diameter immediately after HSP and CSP was 5.1 mm and 7.5 mm, respectively (P < .001). The diameter 1 day after the procedure increased by 29% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17%-41%) with HSP and decreased by 25% (95% CI, 18%-32%) with CSP (P < .001). Muscularis mucosa was obtained similarly with HSP and CSP (96% [95% CI, 82%-99%] vs 92% [95% CI, 75%-98%]; P = .603). Submucosal tissue was obtained significantly more frequently with HSP than with CSP (81% [95% CI, 63%-92%] vs 24% [95% CI, 11%-43%]; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The resection width immediately after CSP was larger than that after HSP but was significantly smaller at day 1 after resection. Although the resection depth after CSP was more superficial, muscularis mucosa was obtained in most specimens. Thus, CSP has sufficient resection width and depth to enable complete polyp resection and potentially has a superior safety profile than HSP.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29122600     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.10.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  19 in total

1.  Meaningless comparison of resection depth between cold snare polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  Mitsunobu Matsushita; Akiyoshi Nishio; Kazuichi Okazaki
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Some Like It Cold: Postpolypectomy Delayed Hemorrhage in Anticoagulated Patients.

Authors:  Yu-Hsi Hsieh; Malcolm Koo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Effect of cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Qing-Qing Meng; Min Rao; Pu-Jun Gao
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 1.534

4.  Clinical guidance on endoscopic management of colonic polyps in Singapore.

Authors:  Tiing Leong Ang; Jit Fong Lim; Tju Siang Chua; Kok Yang Tan; James Weiquan Li; Chern Hao Chong; Kok Ann Gwee; Vikneswaran S/O Namasivayam; Charles Kien Fong Vu; Christopher Jen Lock Khor; Lai Mun Wang; Khay Guan Yeoh
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.331

5.  Indications for Cold Polypectomy Stratified by the Colorectal Polyp Size: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Takuji Kawamura; Yoji Takeuchi; Isao Yokota; Nobumasa Takagaki
Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon       Date:  2020-04-28

6.  Safety of endoscopic procedures with monopolar versus bipolar instruments in an ex vivo porcine model.

Authors:  Kensuke Shinmura; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Motohiro Kojima; Hiroshi Nakamura; Shozo Osera; Yusuke Yoda; Keisuke Hori; Yasuhiro Oono; Atsushi Ochiai; Tomonori Yano
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 7.  Anticoagulation and antiplatelet management in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A review of current evidence.

Authors:  Andrew Chan; Hamish Philpott; Amanda H Lim; Minnie Au; Derrick Tee; Damian Harding; Mohamed Asif Chinnaratha; Biju George; Rajvinder Singh
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2020-11-16

Review 8.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Shinji Tanaka; Yusuke Saitoh; Takahisa Matsuda; Masahiro Igarashi; Takayuki Matsumoto; Yasushi Iwao; Yasumoto Suzuki; Ryoichi Nozaki; Tamotsu Sugai; Shiro Oka; Michio Itabashi; Ken-Ichi Sugihara; Osamu Tsuruta; Ichiro Hirata; Hiroshi Nishida; Hiroto Miwa; Nobuyuki Enomoto; Tooru Shimosegawa; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 7.527

9.  Endoscopic polypectomy devices.

Authors:  Vinay Chandrasekhara; Nikhil A Kumta; Barham K Abu Dayyeh; Manoop S Bhutani; Pichamol Jirapinyo; Kumar Krishnan; John T Maple; Joshua Melson; Rahul Pannala; Mansour A Parsi; Amrita Sethi; Guru Trikudanathan; Arvind J Trindade; David R Lichtenstein
Journal:  VideoGIE       Date:  2021-04-02

Review 10.  Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumors.

Authors:  Mitsuru Esaki; Sho Suzuki; Hisatomo Ikehara; Chika Kusano; Takuji Gotoda
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-09-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.