Jennifer K Broom1, Alex F Broom2, Emma R Kirby2, Jeffrey J Post3. 1. Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, University of Queensland, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia. Electronic address: jennifer.broom@health.qld.gov.au. 2. School of Social Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 3. Prince of Wales Hospital, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is a critical area to optimize to reduce the escalation of antimicrobial resistance. This article explores the ways by which interpersonal relationships influence SAP decision making. METHODS: Twenty surgeons and anesthetists participated in in-depth semistructured interviews on SAP prescribing. Results were analyzed using the framework approach. RESULTS: Analysis revealed 3 ways by which interpersonal relationships influence SAP: relationship dynamics between the surgeon and the anesthetist determine appropriateness of SAP, particularly operative risk ownership; perceived hierarchies within, and between, surgical and anesthetist specialties influence antibiotic prescribing decisions; and surgical distance from the antimicrobial stewardship team, which influences use of antimicrobial stewardship principles. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to optimize SAP are more likely to be effective in enacting sustained change if they consider the interpersonal and social contexts, including issues of familiarity and cohesiveness, hierarchical patterns, and sense of place within a team. Significant relational dynamics in SAP decision making are centered around risk; that is, personal/reputational risk to different professional groups and ownership of risk for individual patient outcomes. Risk must therefore be considered for sustainable SAP optimization interventions.
BACKGROUND: Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is a critical area to optimize to reduce the escalation of antimicrobial resistance. This article explores the ways by which interpersonal relationships influence SAP decision making. METHODS: Twenty surgeons and anesthetists participated in in-depth semistructured interviews on SAP prescribing. Results were analyzed using the framework approach. RESULTS: Analysis revealed 3 ways by which interpersonal relationships influence SAP: relationship dynamics between the surgeon and the anesthetist determine appropriateness of SAP, particularly operative risk ownership; perceived hierarchies within, and between, surgical and anesthetist specialties influence antibiotic prescribing decisions; and surgical distance from the antimicrobial stewardship team, which influences use of antimicrobial stewardship principles. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to optimize SAP are more likely to be effective in enacting sustained change if they consider the interpersonal and social contexts, including issues of familiarity and cohesiveness, hierarchical patterns, and sense of place within a team. Significant relational dynamics in SAP decision making are centered around risk; that is, personal/reputational risk to different professional groups and ownership of risk for individual patient outcomes. Risk must therefore be considered for sustainable SAP optimization interventions.
Authors: Hazel Parker; Julia Frost; Jo Day; Rob Bethune; Anu Kajamaa; Kieran Hand; Sophie Robinson; Karen Mattick Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-07-20 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Mihaela S Stefan; Kerry A Spitzer; Sehar Zulfiqar; Brent D Heineman; Timothy P Hogan; Lauren M Westafer; Michael S Pulia; Victor M Pinto-Plata; Peter K Lindenauer Journal: J Asthma Date: 2020-11-19 Impact factor: 2.515