Literature DB >> 29122072

Inhibition of Residual Cariogenic Bacteria in Atraumatic Restorative Treatment by Chlorhexidine: Disinfection or Incorporation.

Jooie S Joshi1, Noor M Roshan2, Basha Sakeenabi3, P Poornima1, N B Nagaveni1, V V Subbareddy4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of chlorhexidine (CHX) cavity disinfection and of CHX containing glass ionomer cement (GIC) in inhibiting residual cariogenic bacteria.
METHODS: Ninety, five- to nine-year-olds were randomly allocated to three groups: Group 1-CHX containing GIC; Group 2-CHX cavity disinfection; and Group 3-conventional GIC. Total viable count (TVC), Streptococcus mutans (SM), and Lactobacillus (LB) were analyzed pre-, post-, and three months after atraumatic restorative treatment (ART). The results were statistically analyzed by one-way analysis of variance.
RESULTS: At three months microbial evaluation, Group 1 showed 65 percent reduction of both TVC and LB and 67 percent of SM. Group two showed 64 percent, 58 percent, and 56 percent reduction of TVC, LB, and SM respectively. Group 3 exhibited 41 percent, 42 percent, and 46 percent reduction in mean TVC, LB, and SM counts respectively. Residual microbial counts for Group 3 were 0.41, 0.61, and 0.53 (105 colony forming units) for TVC, LB, and SM, respectively, which was significantly higher (P<0.01) compared to the respective microbial counts in Groups 1 and 2.
CONCLUSION: Both chlorhexidine disinfection and incorporation showed superior efficacy in inhibiting residual microbes compared to conventional ART.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29122072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Dent        ISSN: 0164-1263            Impact factor:   1.874


  5 in total

1.  Microbiological and SEM assessment of atraumatic restorative treatment in adult dentition.

Authors:  Meltem Tekbas Atay; Fatma Koray
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Does the addition of chlorhexidine to glass ionomer cements influence its antimicrobial effect and survival rate? A systematic review.

Authors:  V da Mota Martins; L R Paranhos; M N de Oliveira; L C Maia; A C Machado; P C F Santos-Filho
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2022-03-14

3.  Chlorhexidine gluconate enhances the remineralization effect of high viscosity glass ionomer cement on dentin carious lesions in vitro.

Authors:  Patcharanun Borompiyasawat; Boonsong Putraphan; Sureerat Luangworakhun; Waleerat Sukarawan; Oranuch Techatharatip
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 4.  Minimally Invasive Therapies for the Management of Dental Caries-A Literature Review.

Authors:  Hetal Desai; Cameron A Stewart; Yoav Finer
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-07

5.  Antimicrobial Efficacy of Glass Ionomer Cement in Incorporation with Biogenic Zingiber officinale Capped Silver-Nanobiotic, Chlorhexidine Diacetate and Lyophilized Miswak.

Authors:  Amal Adnan Ashour; Sakeenabi Basha; Nayef H Felemban; Enas T Enan; Amal Ahmed Alyamani; Sanaa M F Gad El-Rab
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.