| Literature DB >> 29121864 |
Yongqin Zhang1,2, Jinhui Liu1,2, Wen Fu1,2, Wenting Xu1,2, Huiqin Zhang1,2, Shujuan Chen1,2, Wenbin Liu1,2, Liangyue Peng1,2, Yamei Xiao3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Crucian carp is a popular ornamental strain in Asia with variants in body color. To further explore the genetic mechanisms underlying gray and red body color formation in crucian carp, the skin transcriptomes and partial DNA methylation sites were obtained from red crucian carp (RCC) and white crucian carp (WCC). Here, we show significant differences in mRNA expression and DNA methylation sites between skin tissues of RCC and WCC.Entities:
Keywords: Body color; Crucian carp; DNA methylation; Pigment cell; Transcriptome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29121864 PMCID: PMC5680753 DOI: 10.1186/s12863-017-0564-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genet ISSN: 1471-2156 Impact factor: 2.797
Overview of sequencing and assembly
| Sample | RCC | WCC |
|---|---|---|
| Total Raw Reads | 58,450,968 | 55,645,610 |
| Total Clean Reads | 54,626,008 | 52,222,670 |
| Total Clean Nucleotides | 4,916,340,720 | 4,700,040,300 |
| Q20 percentage | 97.95% | 98.01% |
| N percentage | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| GC percentage | 47.10% | 47.27% |
| N50 | 1038 | 1074 |
| Mean | 597 | 602 |
| Unigenes | 56,564 | 56,612 |
Fig. 1Summary of GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis. a Gene ontology classification of unigenes between the RCC and the WCC. “Red” represents the unigenes that are expressed in the RCC; “White” represents the unigenes that have expression inthe WCC. b Differentially gene expression in the skin of the RCC and the WCC. c Gene ontology classification of differentially expressed unigenes between the RCC and the WCC. “Up” represents the unigenes that are over-expressed in the RCC; “Down” represents the unigenes that have reduced expression in the WCC. d KEGG enrichment top30 bubble chart. The x-axis Enrichment Score is an enrichment score. The more the number of different genes is the larger bubble. The bubble color is changed by red-green, and its enrichment p-value is large
Fig. 2Comparison of relative fold change of Illumina sequencing with qRT-PCR results between the RCC skin and the WCC skin
Analysis of differentially expressed genes related to pigmentation
| Gene | RCC_FPKM | WCC_FPKM |
| Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wnt2b | 1.112 | 4.019 | 3.00E-50 | Wnt family member 2b |
| Pax3a | 0.853 | 8.546 | 4.00E-18 | Paired box protein Pax-3a |
| Mitfa | 0.647 | 2.645 | 1.00E-59 | Microphthalmia associated transcription factor a |
| Foxd3 | 10.032 | 1.257 | 0 | Forkhead box D3 |
| Tyr | 1.094 | 2.456 | 0 | Tyrosinase |
| Tyrp1b | 0.435 | 2.992 | 0 | Tyrosinase-related protein 1b |
| Dct | 0.214 | 2.124 | 2.00E-92 | Dopachrome tautomerase |
| Silva | 0.684 | 3.794 | 2.00E-113 | Silver protien a |
| Hpda | 103.485 | 37.312 | 1.00E-139 | 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase a |
| Mc1r | 0.863 | 2.111 | 2.00E-27 | Melanocortin receptor 1 |
| Hgd | 14.715 | 5.784 | 2.00E-87 | Homogentisate1,2-dioxygenase |
| Gch1 | 4.461 | 2.152 | 7.00E-23 | GTP cyclohydrolase 1 |
| Xdh | 6.877 | 2.571 | 0 | Xanthine dehydrogenase/oxidase |
| Kitla | 5.989 | 2.667 | 0 | Kit ligand a |
| Ptps | 6.028 | 0.547 | 6.00E-120 | 6-pyruvoyl tetrahydropterin synthase |
| Atg4a | 1.311 | 0.214 | 0 | Autophagy related 4 homolog A |
| Atg9a | 9.862 | 4.478 | 0 | Autophagy related 9 homolog A |
| Tfe3a | 9.802 | 4.732 | 1.00E-23 | Transcription factor binding to IGHM enhancer 3a |
| C-fos | 7.477 | 63.901 | 7.00E-99 | C-Fos protein |
| Gnas | 2.457 | 5.253 | 1.00E-07 | Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(s) alpha |
| Gch2 | 1.194 | 9.245 | 5.00E-172 | GTP cyclohydrolase 2 |
| Tp53 | 3.013 | 1.717 | 0 | Tumor protein p53 |
| Chuk | 3.993 | 8.183 | 1E-136 | Inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase alpha |
| Il3ra | 5.661 | 0.692 | 7.00E-14 | Interleukin 3 receptor alpha |
| Il1r1 | 7.693 | 1.916 | 3.00E-177 | Interleukin 1 receptor type I |
| Il-8 | 13.218 | 6.084 | 2.00E-26 | Interleukin-8 |
| C-fms | 6.907 | 1.148 | 0 | Colony stimulating factor 1 receptor |
| Pax6b | 3.518 | 0.922 | 1.00E-50 | Paired box protein Pax-6b |
| Tsc1a | 14.976 | 3.016 | 0 | Tuberous sclerosis 1a |
| Sox9b | 4.202 | 2.215 | 9.00E-169 | HMG-box transcription factor Sox9b |
| Erk2 | 2.078 | 4.178 | 0 | Extracellular signal regulated protein kinase 2 |
Fig. 3Real-time PCR analysis for a part of the differentially expressed genes. The lowercase letters show the significant differences (*P < 0.05) (means ± SD of relative expression; n = 3 for each group)
DNA methylation site coverage depth in two coloration crucian carp skins
| Sample | CCGG | CCWGG | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site | Depth | Site | Depth | |
| WCC | 88,536 | 28.35 | 9534 | 9.02 |
| RCC | 96,122 | 30.71 | 7961 | 9.18 |
| Average | 92,329 | 29.53 | 8748 | 9.10 |
Fig. 4DNA methylation site on gene DNA methylation levels and function components distribution. a The distribution of differential DNA methylation sites on chromosomes. b DNA methylation level change line chart. The red curve represents the methylation level of the RCC, and the green curve represents the methylation level of the WCC. c DNA methylation site on different gene function components distribution histogram. 1stexon: first exon; Body: gene area; TSS200: gene starting sites within 200 bp upstream area; TSS1500: gene starting sites within 1500 bp upstream area; Exon: intron area; Intergenic: intergenic region. d KEGG enrichment analysis DNA methylation gene on top30 bubble chart. The x-axis Enrichment Score is an enrichment score. The more the number of different genes is the larger bubble. The bubble color is changed by red-blue-green-yellow, and its enrichment p-value is large
Analysis of differentially expressed genes and their DNA methylation levels
| Gene ID | Red-FPKM | White-FPKM | Log2 (R/W) | Red-RPM | White-RPM | Log2 (R/W) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyr | 1.09 | 2.46 | −1.16 | 32.46 | 8.63 | 1.91 |
| Mitfa | 0.65 | 2.85 | −1.92 | 31.13 | 11.38 | 1.45 |
| Foxd3 | 10.03 | 2.257 | 4.44 | 0.33 | 16.87 | −5.67 |
| Dct | 0.21 | 2.12 | −3.31 | 9.72 | 3.53 | 1.46 |
| Hpda | 103.48 | 37.31 | 1.47 | 1.26 | 23.45 | −3.86−4.21 |
Fig. 5The tyrosine genomic DNA methylation site analysis. a The gene structure of TYR and its associated MethylRAD tags. The differentially DNA methylated sites are indicated by red tag names. b Comparison of DNA methylation levels between two groups for each tag in the tyr gene
Fig. 6Verification of the expression of MITFa, TYR and DCT protein by western blot analysis. The “RCC-1”, “RCC-2,” and “RCC-3” represent the bands from the RCC; “WCC-1”, “WCC-2,” and “WCC-3” represent the bands from the WCC