Literature DB >> 29121787

Factors associated with reporting results for pulmonary clinical trials in ClinicalTrials.gov.

Isaretta L Riley1, L Ebony Boulware2,3, Jie-Lena Sun4, Karen Chiswell4, Loretta G Que1, Monica Kraft5, Jamie L Todd1,4, Scott M Palmer1,4, Monique L Anderson4,6.   

Abstract

Background/aims The Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act mandates that applicable clinical trials report basic summary results to the ClinicalTrials.gov database within 1 year of trial completion or termination. We aimed to determine the proportion of pulmonary trials reporting basic summary results to ClinicalTrials.gov and assess factors associated with reporting. Methods We identified pulmonary clinical trials subject to the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act (called highly likely applicable clinical trials) that were completed or terminated between 2008 and 2012 and reported results by September 2013. We estimated the cumulative percentage of applicable clinical trials reporting results by pulmonary disease category. Multivariable Cox regression modeling identified characteristics independently associated with results reporting. Results Of 1450 pulmonary highly likely applicable clinical trials, 380 (26%) examined respiratory neoplasms, 238 (16%) asthma, 175 (12%) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 657 (45%) other respiratory diseases. Most (75%) were pharmaceutical highly likely applicable clinical trials and 71% were industry-funded. Approximately 15% of highly likely applicable clinical trials reported results within 1 year of trial completion, while 55% reported results over the 5-year study period. Earlier phase highly likely applicable clinical trials were less likely to report results compared to phase 4 highly likely applicable clinical trials (phases 1/2 and 2 (adjusted hazard ratio 0.41 (95% confidence interval: 0.31-0.54)), phases 2/3 and 3 (adjusted hazard ratio 0.55 (95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.72)) and phase not applicable (adjusted hazard ratio 0.43 (95% confidence interval: 0.29-0.63)). Pulmonary highly likely applicable clinical trials without Food and Drug Administration oversight were less likely to report results compared with those with oversight (adjusted hazard ratio 0.65 (95% confidence interval: 0.51-0.83)). Conclusion A total of 15% of pulmonary clinical highly likely applicable clinical trials report basic summary results to ClinicalTrials.gov within 1 year of trial completion. Strategies to improve reporting are needed within the pulmonary community.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ClinicalTrials.gov; Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act; Policy; asthma; cancer; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; clinical trials; compliance; pulmonary; transparency

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29121787      PMCID: PMC6007020          DOI: 10.1177/1740774517740352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  27 in total

Review 1.  Clinical trial transparency: many gains but access to evidence for new medicines remains imperfect.

Authors:  Barbara Mintzes; Joel Lexchin; Ancella Santos Quintano
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  Sharing Clinical Trial Data--A Proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.

Authors:  Darren B Taichman; Joyce Backus; Christopher Baethge; Howard Bauchner; Peter W de Leeuw; Jeffrey M Drazen; John Fletcher; Frank A Frizelle; Trish Groves; Abraham Haileamlak; Astrid James; Christine Laine; Larry Peiperl; Anja Pinborg; Peush Sahni; Sinan Wu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Medicine. Moving toward transparency of clinical trials.

Authors:  Deborah A Zarin; Tony Tse
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Public availability of results of trials assessing cancer drugs in the United States.

Authors:  Thi-Anh-Hoa Nguyen; Agnes Dechartres; Soraya Belgherbi; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Trial Reporting in ClinicalTrials.gov - The Final Rule.

Authors:  Deborah A Zarin; Tony Tse; Rebecca J Williams; Sarah Carr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The ClinicalTrials.gov results database--update and key issues.

Authors:  Deborah A Zarin; Tony Tse; Rebecca J Williams; Robert M Califf; Nicholas C Ide
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The proposed rule for U.S. clinical trial registration and results submission.

Authors:  Deborah A Zarin; Tony Tse; Jerry Sheehan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Compliance with results reporting at ClinicalTrials.gov.

Authors:  Monique L Anderson; Karen Chiswell; Eric D Peterson; Asba Tasneem; James Topping; Robert M Califf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy.

Authors:  Erick H Turner; Annette M Matthews; Eftihia Linardatos; Robert A Tell; Robert Rosenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  How often do US-based human subjects research studies register on time, and how often do they post their results? A statistical analysis of the Clinicaltrials.gov database.

Authors:  Christopher J Gill
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  1 in total

1.  Retracted publications in pharmacy systematic reviews.

Authors:  Sarah Jane Brown; Caitlin J Bakker; Nicole R Theis-Mahon
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2022-01-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.