Literature DB >> 29121402

Incorporating Functional Genomic Information to Enhance Polygenic Signal and Identify Variants Involved in Gene-by-Environment Interaction for Young Adult Alcohol Problems.

Jessica E Salvatore1,2, Jeanne E Savage2, Peter Barr1, Aaron R Wolen3, Fazil Aliev1,4, Eero Vuoksimaa5, Antti Latvala5, Lea Pulkkinen6, Richard J Rose7, Jaakko Kaprio5, Danielle M Dick1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Characterizing aggregate genetic risk for alcohol misuse and identifying variants involved in gene-by-environment (G × E) interaction effects has so far been a major challenge. We hypothesized that functional genomic information could be used to enhance detection of polygenic signal underlying alcohol misuse and to prioritize identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) most likely to exhibit G × E effects.
METHODS: We examined these questions in the young adult FinnTwin12 sample (n = 1,170). We used genomewide association estimates from an independent sample to derive 2 types of polygenic scores for alcohol problems in FinnTwin12. Genomewide polygenic scores included all SNPs surpassing a designated p-value threshold. DNase polygenic scores were a subset of the genomewide polygenic scores including only variants in DNase I hypersensitive sites (DHSs), which are open chromatin marks likely to index regions with a regulatory function. We conducted parallel analyses using height as a nonpsychiatric model phenotype to evaluate the consistency of effects. For the G × E analyses, we examined whether SNPs in DHSs were overrepresented among SNPs demonstrating significant G × E effects in an interaction between romantic relationship status and intoxication frequency.
RESULTS: Contrary to our expectations, we found that DNase polygenic scores were not more strongly predictive of alcohol problems than conventional polygenic scores. However, variants in DNase polygenic scores had per-SNP effects that were up to 1.4 times larger than variants in conventional polygenic scores. This same pattern of effects was also observed in supplementary analyses with height. In G × E models, SNPs in DHSs were modestly overrepresented among SNPs with significant interaction effects for intoxication frequency.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the potential utility of integrating functional genomic annotation information to increase the signal-to-noise ratio in polygenic scores and identify genetic variants that may be most susceptible to environmental modification.
Copyright © 2017 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcohol; Functional Genomics; Gene-Environment Interplay; Polygenic Scores

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29121402      PMCID: PMC5785466          DOI: 10.1111/acer.13551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  54 in total

1.  Genetic and environmental influences on alcohol use problems: moderation by romantic partner support, but not family or friend support.

Authors:  Amber M Jarnecke; Susan C South
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Partitioning heritability of regulatory and cell-type-specific variants across 11 common diseases.

Authors:  Alexander Gusev; S Hong Lee; Gosia Trynka; Hilary Finucane; Bjarni J Vilhjálmsson; Han Xu; Chongzhi Zang; Stephan Ripke; Brendan Bulik-Sullivan; Eli Stahl; Anna K Kähler; Christina M Hultman; Shaun M Purcell; Steven A McCarroll; Mark Daly; Bogdan Pasaniuc; Patrick F Sullivan; Benjamin M Neale; Naomi R Wray; Soumya Raychaudhuri; Alkes L Price
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Systematic localization of common disease-associated variation in regulatory DNA.

Authors:  Matthew T Maurano; Richard Humbert; Eric Rynes; Robert E Thurman; Eric Haugen; Hao Wang; Alex P Reynolds; Richard Sandstrom; Hongzhu Qu; Jennifer Brody; Anthony Shafer; Fidencio Neri; Kristen Lee; Tanya Kutyavin; Sandra Stehling-Sun; Audra K Johnson; Theresa K Canfield; Erika Giste; Morgan Diegel; Daniel Bates; R Scott Hansen; Shane Neph; Peter J Sabo; Shelly Heimfeld; Antony Raubitschek; Steven Ziegler; Chris Cotsapas; Nona Sotoodehnia; Ian Glass; Shamil R Sunyaev; Rajinder Kaul; John A Stamatoyannopoulos
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Social Relationships Moderate Genetic Influences on Heavy Drinking in Young Adulthood.

Authors:  Peter B Barr; Jessica E Salvatore; Hermine H Maes; Tellervo Korhonen; Antti Latvala; Fazil Aliev; Richard Viken; Richard J Rose; Jaakko Kaprio; Danielle M Dick
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.582

5.  Measures of current alcohol consumption and problems: two independent twin studies suggest a complex genetic architecture.

Authors:  Danielle M Dick; Jacquelyn L Meyers; Richard J Rose; Jaakko Kaprio; Kenneth S Kendler
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 6.  The influence of gene-environment interactions on alcohol consumption and alcohol use disorders: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Kelly C Young-Wolff; Mary-Anne Enoch; Carol A Prescott
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-03-23

7.  The genetics of alcohol dependence: Twin and SNP-based heritability, and genome-wide association study based on AUDIT scores.

Authors:  Hamdi Mbarek; Yuri Milaneschi; Iryna O Fedko; Jouke-Jan Hottenga; Marleen H M de Moor; Rick Jansen; Joel Gelernter; Richard Sherva; Gonneke Willemsen; Dorret I Boomsma; Brenda W Penninx; Jacqueline M Vink
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.568

8.  Three mutually informative ways to understand the genetic relationships among behavioral disinhibition, alcohol use, drug use, nicotine use/dependence, and their co-occurrence: twin biometry, GCTA, and genome-wide scoring.

Authors:  Scott I Vrieze; Matt McGue; Michael B Miller; Brian M Hicks; William G Iacono
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 2.805

9.  Common polygenic variation contributes to risk of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Shaun M Purcell; Naomi R Wray; Jennifer L Stone; Peter M Visscher; Michael C O'Donovan; Patrick F Sullivan; Pamela Sklar
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Power and predictive accuracy of polygenic risk scores.

Authors:  Frank Dudbridge
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Recent Efforts to Dissect the Genetic Basis of Alcohol Use and Abuse.

Authors:  Sandra Sanchez-Roige; Abraham A Palmer; Toni-Kim Clarke
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 13.382

2.  Polygenic Score for Smoking is associated with Externalizing Psychopathology and Disinhibited Personality Traits but not Internalizing Psychopathology in Adolescence.

Authors:  Brian M Hicks; D Angus Clark; Joseph D Deak; Mengzhen Liu; C Emily Durbin; Jonathan D Schaefer; Sylia Wilson; William G Iacono; Matt McGue; Scott I Vrieze
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-05-06

3.  Using Genetic Marginal Effects to Study Gene-Environment Interactions with GWAS Data.

Authors:  Brad Verhulst; Joshua N Pritikin; James Clifford; Elizabeth Prom-Wormley
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Systematic Review of Polygenic Gene-Environment Interaction in Tobacco, Alcohol, and Cannabis Use.

Authors:  Joëlle A Pasman; Karin J H Verweij; Jacqueline M Vink
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  Psychosocial moderation of polygenic risk for cannabis involvement: the role of trauma exposure and frequency of religious service attendance.

Authors:  Jacquelyn L Meyers; Jessica E Salvatore; Fazil Aliev; Emma C Johnson; Vivia V McCutcheon; Jinni Su; Sally I-Chun Kuo; Dongbing Lai; Leah Wetherill; Jen C Wang; Grace Chan; Victor Hesselbrock; Tatiana Foroud; Kathleen K Bucholz; Howard J Edenberg; Danielle M Dick; Bernice Porjesz; Arpana Agrawal
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 6.  FinnTwin12 Cohort: An Updated Review.

Authors:  Richard J Rose; Jessica E Salvatore; Sari Aaltonen; Peter B Barr; Leonie H Bogl; Holly A Byers; Kauko Heikkilä; Tellervo Korhonen; Antti Latvala; Teemu Palviainen; Anu Ranjit; Alyce M Whipp; Lea Pulkkinen; Danielle M Dick; Jaakko Kaprio
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 1.587

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.