Literature DB >> 29121000

Meeting Summary: State and Local Implementation Strategies for Increasing Access to Contraception During Zika Preparedness and Response - United States, September 2016.

Charlan D Kroelinger, Lisa Romero, Eva Lathrop, Shanna Cox, Isabel Morgan, Meghan T Frey, Lee Warner, Kathryn M Curtis, Karen Pazol, Wanda D Barfield, Dana Meaney-Delman, Denise J Jamieson.   

Abstract

Zika virus infection during pregnancy is a cause of microcephaly and other serious brain abnormalities (1). To support state and territory response to the threat of Zika, CDC's Interim Zika Response Plan outlined activities for vector control; clinical management of exposed pregnant women and infants; targeted communication about Zika virus transmission among women and men of reproductive age; and primary prevention of Zika-related adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes by prevention of unintended pregnancies through increased access to contraception.* The most highly effective,† reversible contraception includes intrauterine devices and implants, known as long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). On September 28, 2016, the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP) and CDC facilitated a meeting in Atlanta, Georgia, of representatives from 15 states to identify state-led efforts to implement seven CDC-published strategies aimed at increasing access to contraception in the context of Zika virus (2). Qualitative data were collected from participating jurisdictions. The number of states reporting implementation of each strategy ranged from four to 11. Participants identified numerous challenges, particularly for strategies implemented less frequently. Examples of barriers were discussed and presented with corresponding approaches to address each barrier. Addressing these barriers could facilitate increased access to contraception, which might decrease the number of unintended pregnancies affected by Zika virus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29121000      PMCID: PMC5679579          DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6644a6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


Zika virus infection during pregnancy is a cause of microcephaly and other serious brain abnormalities (). To support state and territory response to the threat of Zika, CDC’s Interim Zika Response Plan outlined activities for vector control; clinical management of exposed pregnant women and infants; targeted communication about Zika virus transmission among women and men of reproductive age; and primary prevention of Zika-related adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes by prevention of unintended pregnancies through increased access to contraception.* The most highly effective, reversible contraception includes intrauterine devices and implants, known as long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). On September 28, 2016, the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP) and CDC facilitated a meeting in Atlanta, Georgia, of representatives from 15 states to identify state-led efforts to implement seven CDC-published strategies aimed at increasing access to contraception in the context of Zika virus (). Qualitative data were collected from participating jurisdictions. The number of states reporting implementation of each strategy ranged from four to 11. Participants identified numerous challenges, particularly for strategies implemented less frequently. Examples of barriers were discussed and presented with corresponding approaches to address each barrier. Addressing these barriers could facilitate increased access to contraception, which might decrease the number of unintended pregnancies affected by Zika virus. Twenty-six participants representing 15 states and 11 local health departments and clinics were selected to attend the Atlanta meeting, based on successful implementation of at least two of the seven strategies for increasing access to contraception (Table 1). AMCHP conducted a premeeting web-based assessment among attendees on the use of specific approaches for implementing the seven strategies. Responses to the assessment represented 12 states, including 12 state-level participants and six local-level participants and service providers. During the in-person meeting, participants discussed the premeeting assessment responses and identified approaches to addressing barriers and maximizing facilitators for increasing access to contraception in three AMCHP-facilitated discussion sessions. Representatives from federal agencies and maternal and child health (MCH) organizations participated and provided technical and scientific expertise.** CDC analyzed qualitative data () to identify state implementation approaches (Table 2) that addressed barriers to and facilitators of success for the seven strategies.
TABLE 1

State and local jurisdictional-level strategies and approaches for increasing access to contraceptive methods — Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs and CDC-sponsored premeeting assessment topics, Atlanta, Georgia, September 2016

StrategyPotential approaches to implement strategy
1. Facilitate partnerships among private and public insurers, device manufacturers, and state agencies
Establish direct payment program to absorb acquisition and stocking costs
Develop pharmacy contracts to obtain a limited number of LARC devices
Develop pharmacy contracts to return unused and unopened LARC devices
Develop pharmacy contracts to bill insurers directly for LARC devices
2. Reimburse providers for the full range of contraceptive services
Implement a payment policy to reimburse for the costs of screening for pregnancy intention
Implement a payment policy to reimburse for the costs of client-centered counseling
Implement activities to reduce barriers to supplies by using prestocked kits for immediate postpartum LARC insertion
Implement a payment policy to reimburse for the actual cost of LARC devices to provide the full range of contraceptive methods
Develop a payment policy for device insertion, device removal, device replacement, device reinsertion, and client follow-up
Implement a payment policy for the costs of immediate postpartum LARC supplies, procedure, and follow-up
3. Remove logistic and administrative barriers for contraceptive services and supplies
Ensure all FDA-approved contraceptive methods are covered by state policy
Eliminate requirement for prior authorization for LARC prescriptions in state payment plan
Eliminate requirement for multiple visits with a health care provider before LARC prescription in state payment plan
Eliminate step therapy requirements before LARC prescription in state payment plan
4. Train health care providers on current insertion and removal techniques for LARC using evidence-based guidance
Incorporate federal evidence-based contraceptive guidance into state family planning guidelines
Collect data on adopted or continued use of most or moderately effective FDA-approved methods of contraception among women aged 15–44 years*
Collect data on adopted or continued use of LARC among women aged 15–44 years
Provide resources to train and inform health care providers on LARC insertion and removal techniques
Provide resources to providers to dispel common misperceptions about LARC methods including: IUD and infertility; IUD and abortifacients; LARC and cancer; LARC and weight gain; LARC and adolescents; LARC and nulliparous women
5. Support youth-friendly reproductive health services
Train health care providers to provide youth with client-centered reproductive health services
Provide teen-focused, culturally appropriate materials for clinic services
Collaborate with clinics to encourage expanded availability of adolescent-friendly reproductive health services (e.g., weekend and/or extended hours, eliminating prerequisite screening)
Promote protocols to protect against confidentiality breaches, specifically for adolescent patients (e.g., not disclosing Explanation of Benefits to parents of minors)
6. Engage smaller or rural facilities including community health centers
Provide funding to smaller or rural health care facilities and clinics to support increased access to contraceptive services
Develop policies on contraceptive use for smaller or rural health care facilities
Provide targeted resources on highly effective, reversible contraception for providers serving predominantly small or rural communities
7. Assess client satisfaction with service provision and increase consumer awareness Provide resources to clinics to collect or analyze data that assesses women’s satisfaction with chosen contraceptive method(s)
Engage in health promotion campaigns to increase consumer awareness about LARC methods

Abbreviations: Food and Drug Administration = FDA; intrauterine devices = IUD; long-acting reversible contraception = LARC.

* Moderately effective contraceptive methods include injectables, pills, patch, ring, and diaphragm. Approximately 6–12 pregnancies per 100 women using these methods will occur during the first year of typical use compared with the most effective birth control methods, which result in fewer than one pregnancy per 100 women during the first year of typical use.

TABLE 2

Barriers, facilitators, and approaches for implementing strategies to increase access to contraception — Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs and CDC-sponsored meeting, Atlanta, Georgia, September 2016

StrategyBarriersFacilitatorsPotential approaches to addressing barriers and maximizing facilitators
1. Facilitate partnerships among private and public insurers, device manufacturers, and state agencies
Consistent personnel turnover across agencies; limited understanding of internal structure of other agencies and organizations
Centralized state health department structure that partners to disseminate devices and revised policies
Institutionalize partnerships among agencies and organizations regardless of structure and personnel changes; establish public-private partnerships with device manufacturers, payers, health centers
2. Reimburse providers for full range of contraceptive services
Bundled reimbursement rates and global fees for immediate postpartum LARC; policies prohibiting prescription for LARC and insertion during the same visit
Expanded definitions of provider groups for provision of comprehensive client-centered counseling
Enhance reimbursement for immediate postpartum LARC services (device insertion and device cost); train mid-level providers, paraprofessionals, and support personnel on contraceptive counseling
3. Remove logistic and administrative barriers for contraceptive services and supplies
Lack of knowledge on billing and coding for contraceptive services; preapprovals, multiple visits, and step therapy requirements for clients to receive LARC; additional barriers for populations including the undocumented, uninsured, or incarcerated women of reproductive age
Provider champions influence provision of contraceptive services at the state, health systems, facility, and clinic levels
Train billers and coders on procedures for reimbursement policies; develop payment mechanisms for populations with less access to services; develop policies for same-day LARC insertion; eliminate prior authorization, cost sharing, and other requirements to receive LARC potentially leveraging 340B pricing; engage provider champions
4. Train health care providers on current insertion and removal techniques for long-acting reversible contraceptives
Lack of providers to insert LARC including family physicians, pediatricians, nurses; lack of information on providers who insert LARC
Release of updated evidence-based clinical guidance; release of updated quality family planning services recommendations
Complete a needs assessment of family planning services throughout the state; train providers on newest insertion techniques
5. Support youth-friendly reproductive health services
Policies on Explanation of Benefits release to policy-holder; clinic hours during normal business hours; clinics located far from schools
Available teen-focused, culturally appropriate materials
Engage in youth-friendly feedback on services including youth advisory boards, mystery shoppers, social media; ensure confidentiality of adolescent contraceptive services by revising policies with payers and insurers; encourage client-centered contraceptive counseling and screening for pregnancy intention for adolescents
6. Engage smaller or rural facilities including community health centers
Remote clinic location impacts availability of contraceptives and providers
Increased availability of telemedicine/telehealth opportunities
Train personnel on billing and coding procedures for contraceptive methods; provide carve-out or subsidy funding for patient encounter, counseling, contraceptive device, and insertion
7. Assess client satisfaction with service provision and increase consumer awareness Lack of data on client satisfaction with contraceptive method; limited funding for state-level social media or traditional media campaignsExamples of successful social media or traditional media campaigns for replication among other statesDistinguish between client satisfaction and experience; develop surveillance data on satisfaction and experience; collaborate with nontraditional partners including supermarket chains, retail outlets, and airports, to provide messaging on contraception particularly during emergency response

Abbreviation: long-acting reversible contraception = LARC.

Abbreviations: Food and Drug Administration = FDA; intrauterine devices = IUD; long-acting reversible contraception = LARC. * Moderately effective contraceptive methods include injectables, pills, patch, ring, and diaphragm. Approximately 6–12 pregnancies per 100 women using these methods will occur during the first year of typical use compared with the most effective birth control methods, which result in fewer than one pregnancy per 100 women during the first year of typical use. Abbreviation: long-acting reversible contraception = LARC. Strategy 1. Facilitate partnerships among insurers, manufacturers, and state agencies. Respondents from eight of 12 states indicated that their state health agencies partnered to implement a direct payment program to absorb contraceptive device acquisition and stocking costs, develop pharmacy contracts to obtain devices, bill insurers directly for devices, or offer an option to return unused or unopened devices (Table 1). Personnel turnover and limited understanding of the internal organization and structure of other agencies were identified as barriers to developing contracts with payers and manufacturers (Table 2). Leaders with successful external partnerships leveraged current health department structures to institutionalize interagency partnerships and implement public-private partnerships to address these barriers. Strategy 2. Reimburse providers for the full range of contraceptive services. Seven of 12 states implemented policies to reimburse providers for the actual cost of LARC devices and eliminate barriers in state payment plans for LARC prescriptions (Table 1). States described implementing a payment policy for immediate postpartum LARC supplies, procedures, and follow-up, using prestocked kits. States discussed payment policies to reimburse providers for pregnancy intention screening and client-centered contraceptive counseling. Successful approaches to overcoming payment barriers included leveraging health department support in developing immediate postpartum LARC policies that reimburse for the device costs, insertion fees, and training of mid-level providers on contraceptive counseling (Table 2). Strategy 3. Remove logistic and administrative barriers for contraceptive services and supplies. Nine of 12 states implemented approaches to eliminate requirements for prior authorization, multiple visits, and step therapy approaches (Table 1). State-reported successful implementation approaches included training of billers and coders on reimbursement procedures, leveraging existing billing mechanisms (e.g., 340B pricing), eliminating requirements for multiple visits to facilitate same-day insertion, removing barriers for vulnerable or targeted populations, and engaging provider champions to influence provision of services (Table 2). Strategy 4. Train health care providers on current insertion and removal techniques for LARC, using evidence-based guidance. Ten of 12 states described integrating evidence-based contraceptive guidance into state family planning guidelines, collecting data on the use of the most effective or moderately effective*** Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved contraceptive methods, and providing resources to dispel common provider misperceptions about LARC (Table 1). Successful approaches to initiating statewide training efforts included statewide service assessment and continuing training of providers on the newest evidence-based techniques (Table 2). Strategy 5. Support youth-friendly reproductive health services. Most (11 of 12) states provided teen-focused, culturally appropriate materials, offered training to providers on the provision of youth-friendly services, encouraged expanded availability of youth-friendly reproductive health services, and ensured that confidentiality concerns of adolescents were addressed in state or clinic policies (Table 1). Meeting participants indicated that a successful implementation approach for this strategy included soliciting youth feedback on services through youth advisory boards, social media, and youth mystery shoppers at service sites (Table 2). Additional approaches include ensuring adolescent confidentiality among payers and insurers and appropriate screening and counseling for this age group. Strategy 6. Engage smaller or rural facilities, including community health centers. Nine of 12 states provided funding to smaller or rural health care facilities and clinics, and targeted resources for LARC at these facilities (Table 1). Approaches to addressing barriers included training staff on billing and coding procedures, and funding subsidies in small or rural clinics for the client encounter, counseling, device cost, and insertion fees (Table 2). Strategy 7. Assess client satisfaction with service provision and increase consumer awareness. Four of 12 states provided resources to assess client satisfaction with the chosen contraceptive method or engaged in health promotion campaigns to increase consumer awareness about highly effective, reversible methods (Table 1). Implementation approaches included developing assessment measures that differentiated between client satisfaction and client experience, and collaborating with nontraditional partners (including supermarket chains, retail outlets, or airports) to expand the reach of contraceptive messaging (Table 2). Meeting participants highlighted limited funding for state-level social media or traditional media campaigns as the greatest barrier to implementation. Use of consumer awareness media campaigns with nontraditional partners was discussed for the dissemination of prevention messaging during a public health emergency, particularly in the context of Zika preparedness. For example, partnering of the state health department with international airports to include Zika virus travel-related guidance from CDC was noted as an effective strategy for Zika preparedness messaging that could also include information on contraception access.

Discussion

Among the 12 state-level responses to the assessment, the majority indicated that their health departments are implementing strategy-specific approaches for facilitating partnerships among insurers and device manufacturers (eight states); removing logistic and administrative barriers for contraceptive services and supplies (nine); training health care providers (10); supporting youth-friendly services (11); and engaging smaller or rural facilities (nine). Fewer reported that their states are implementing strategy-specific approaches for reimbursing providers for the full range of contraceptive services (seven) or assessing client satisfaction and increasing consumer awareness (four). In the context of Zika preparedness, reducing gaps in contraception access might help reduce the number of unintended pregnancies affected by Zika virus infection. States emphasized the importance of partnerships among state and federal health agencies, payers, device manufacturers, and clinics during an emergency response. Attendees also emphasized the importance of overcoming payment barriers to reimburse providers for the full range of services. Currently, many states bundle payment for contraception under one global fee, particularly for immediate postpartum LARC, limiting reimbursement for the full cost of a device and specific insertion procedures (). State policies that allow reimbursement for comprehensive client-centered counseling services are always important, but particularly during an emergency response (), as such policies are implemented in part to prevent coercion of clients to choose any method, including LARC, by supporting informed, autonomous client decisions based on women’s individual needs and preferences (). During an emergency response, it is also especially important to have straightforward and replicable campaigns to increase access to contraception to prevent unintended pregnancy. These are needed to support consumer-focused understanding by presenting the full range of reversible contraceptive methods, while describing the low maintenance and acknowledging the potential for side effects with LARC, to increase awareness of contraceptive method options among all women of reproductive age, including adolescents. CDC works to develop evidence-based, clinical guidance during emergencies. During facilitated discussion, states requested detailed CDC response plans for increasing access to contraception to prevent unintended pregnancy, a primary strategy to reduce Zika-related adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes. Participants emphasized that provider champions can increase both provision of LARC and training of clinical fellows and residents in current insertion and removal techniques. As service providers in the health care system, provider champions are well positioned to educate Medicaid agencies about the benefits of immediate postpartum LARC (), take the lead in disseminating these practices to smaller and rural facilities, and serve as potential trainers and mentors to other providers. Participants discussed developing statewide provider networks to disseminate information and identify service providers who require additional training, and targeting training initiatives using evidence-based contraceptive guidance (–). Similar assessments have identified “contraceptive deserts,” defined as U.S. counties with fewer than one clinic for every 1,000 women in need of publicly funded contraception, further highlighting the need for contraceptive service availability.**** The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, information on contraceptive access was obtained from a relatively small number of persons from invited states; analysis and subsequent approaches developed from information gathered might not be generalizable to all jurisdictions. Second, data collected from participants were self-reported, and therefore, do not necessarily represent official state policies or all activities occurring in a state. Finally, approaches to increasing contraception access developed by participating states have not been evaluated by other states to ensure applicability in all settings. Some approaches implemented by participating states might not be appropriate or successful in other jurisdictions. For women who choose to delay or avoid pregnancy during the Zika virus outbreak, access to the full range of reversible contraceptive methods in all health care systems increases their options to prevent unintended pregnancies. States are encouraged to include strategies to increase access to contraceptive services as a primary strategy in Zika preparedness plans, to prevent adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes associated with Zika virus infection in pregnancy.

What is already known about this topic?

Zika virus infection during pregnancy is a cause of congenital microcephaly and other brain abnormalities. Preventing unintended pregnancy during the Zika virus outbreak is one primary strategy to reduce the number of pregnancies affected by Zika virus. Sexually active women of reproductive age and their sex partners who choose to delay or avoid pregnancy during the Zika virus outbreak should have access to all FDA-approved contraceptive methods, including highly effective, long-acting reversible contraception; however, barriers limit access and availability. CDC has outlined seven strategies states can implement to increase access to contraceptive services.

What is added by this report?

On September 28, 2016, a meeting of 26 representatives from 15 jurisdictions was convened in Atlanta, Georgia to identify state-led efforts to implement the seven strategies. The majority of participants’ states implemented strategies facilitating external partnerships, removing logistic and administrative barriers, training providers, supporting youth-friendly services, and engaging smaller or rural facilities. A smaller proportion implemented strategies for increasing provider reimbursement, assessing client satisfaction, and increasing consumer awareness.

What are the implications for public health practice?

State-led approaches for implementing the seven strategies provide examples that can inform and support adoption in other jurisdictions in the context of Zika preparedness. These approaches could further facilitate access to contraception, which might decrease the number of unintended pregnancies affected by Zika virus infection.
  9 in total

1.  Evaluating and synthesizing qualitative research: the need to develop a distinctive approach.

Authors:  Rosaline S Barbour; Michael Barbour
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  Characterization of Medicaid policy for immediate postpartum contraception.

Authors:  Michelle H Moniz; Vanessa K Dalton; Matthew M Davis; Jane Forman; Bradley Iott; Jessica Landgraf; Tammy Chang
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Providing quality family planning services: Recommendations of CDC and the U.S. Office of Population Affairs.

Authors:  Loretta Gavin; Susan Moskosky; Marion Carter; Kathryn Curtis; Evelyn Glass; Emily Godfrey; Arik Marcell; Nancy Mautone-Smith; Karen Pazol; Naomi Tepper; Lauren Zapata
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2014-04-25

4.  Contraceptive availability during an emergency response in the United States.

Authors:  Sascha R Ellington; Athena P Kourtis; Kathryn M Curtis; Naomi Tepper; Susan Gorman; Denise J Jamieson; Marianne Zotti; Wanda Barfield
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Advocating for immediate postpartum LARC: increasing access, improving outcomes, and decreasing cost.

Authors:  Maria I Rodriguez; Megan Evans; Eve Espey
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Zika Virus and Birth Defects--Reviewing the Evidence for Causality.

Authors:  Sonja A Rasmussen; Denise J Jamieson; Margaret A Honein; Lyle R Petersen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016.

Authors:  Kathryn M Curtis; Naomi K Tepper; Tara C Jatlaoui; Erin Berry-Bibee; Leah G Horton; Lauren B Zapata; Katharine B Simmons; H Pamela Pagano; Denise J Jamieson; Maura K Whiteman
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2016-07-29

8.  U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2016.

Authors:  Kathryn M Curtis; Tara C Jatlaoui; Naomi K Tepper; Lauren B Zapata; Leah G Horton; Denise J Jamieson; Maura K Whiteman
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2016-07-29

9.  Contraceptive Use Among Nonpregnant and Postpartum Women at Risk for Unintended Pregnancy, and Female High School Students, in the Context of Zika Preparedness - United States, 2011-2013 and 2015.

Authors:  Sheree L Boulet; Denise V D'Angelo; Brian Morrow; Lauren Zapata; Erin Berry-Bibee; Maria Rivera; Sascha Ellington; Lisa Romero; Eva Lathrop; Meghan Frey; Tanya Williams; Howard Goldberg; Lee Warner; Leslie Harrison; Shanna Cox; Karen Pazol; Wanda Barfield; Denise J Jamieson; Margaret A Honein; Charlan D Kroelinger
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 17.586

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  Changes in US health care provider attitudes related to contraceptive safety before and after the release of National Guidance.

Authors:  Lauren B Zapata; Isabel A Morgan; Kathryn M Curtis; Suzanne G Folger; Maura K Whiteman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Factors associated with postpartum use of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Titilope Oduyebo; Lauren B Zapata; Maegan E Boutot; Naomi K Tepper; Kathryn M Curtis; Denise V D'Angelo; Polly A Marchbanks; Maura K Whiteman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  A Public Health Systems View of Risk Communication About Zika.

Authors:  Tara Kirk Sell; Sanjana J Ravi; Crystal Watson; Diane Meyer; Laura E Pechta; Dale A Rose; Keri M Lubell; Michelle N Podgornik; Monica Schoch-Spana
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  The Role of Public-Private Partnerships to Increase Access to Contraception in an Emergency Response Setting: The Zika Contraception Access Network Program.

Authors:  Lisa Romero; Zipatly V Mendoza; Laura Croft; Reema Bhakta; Turquoise Sidibe; Nabal Bracero; Claritsa Malave; Alicia Suarez; Linette Sanchez; Darielys Cordero; Eva Lathrop; Judith Monroe
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Assessment of Contraceptive Needs and Improving Access in the U.S.-Affiliated Pacific Islands in the Context of Zika.

Authors:  Caitlin Green; Charity Ntansah; Meghan T Frey; Jamie W Krashin; Eva Lathrop; Lisa Romero
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Contraceptive Use Among Women at Risk for Unintended Pregnancy in the Context of Public Health Emergencies - United States, 2016.

Authors:  Karen Pazol; Sascha R Ellington; Anna C Fulton; Lauren B Zapata; Sheree L Boulet; Marion E Rice; Shanna Cox; Lisa Romero; Eva Lathrop; Stacey Hurst; Charlan D Kroelinger; Howard Goldberg; Carrie K Shapiro-Mendoza; Regina M Simeone; Lee Warner; Dana M Meaney-Delman; Wanda D Barfield
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 17.586

7.  Need for Contraceptive Services Among Women of Reproductive Age - 45 Jurisdictions, United States, 2017-2019.

Authors:  Lauren B Zapata; Karen Pazol; Kathryn M Curtis; Debra J Kane; Tara C Jatlaoui; Suzanne G Folger; Ekwutosi M Okoroh; Shanna Cox; Maura K Whiteman
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 17.586

8.  Vector control in Zika-affected communities: Local views on community engagement and public health ethics during outbreaks.

Authors:  Monica Schoch-Spana; Crystal Watson; Sanjana Ravi; Diane Meyer; Laura E Pechta; Dale A Rose; Keri M Lubell; Michelle N Podgornik; Tara Kirk Sell
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2020-01-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.