Literature DB >> 29120712

Demarcation line depth after contact lens-assisted corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus: Comparison of dextran-based and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose-based riboflavin solutions.

Chintan Malhotra1, Arun K Jain2, Amit Gupta2, Jagat Ram2, Balamurugan Ramatchandirane2, Deepika Dhingra2, Kulbhushan Sachdeva2, Amit Kumar2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the demarcation line depth after contact lens-assisted corneal crosslinking (CXL) for progressive keratoconus using dextran-based and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC)-based riboflavin solutions.
SETTING: Advanced Eye Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
METHODS: Patients with preoperative epithelium-on (epi-on) minimum corneal thickness between 350 μm and 450 μm having contact lens-assisted CXL for progressive keratoconus were crosslinked with isoosmolar 0.1% riboflavin in 20% dextran 500 or HPMC 1.1%. The primary outcome measure was the mean demarcation line depth measured 1 month postoperatively on anterior-segment optical coherence tomography. The secondary outcome measure was change in endothelial cell density (ECD) 6 months from baseline.
RESULTS: The study comprised 21 patients (21 eyes, 9 in the HPMC group and 12 in the dextran group). The mean demarcation line depth was deeper in the HPMC group (308.22 μm ± 84.19 [SD]) than in the dextran group (235.33 ± 64.87 μm) (P < .04). This difference remained significant (P = .02) even after controlling for the preoperative lesser epi-on minimum corneal thickness in the HPMC group (385.56 ±13.81 μm) versus the dextran group (413.08 ± 29.58 μm) (P < .02). The ECD 6 months after contact lens-assisted CXL was comparable to the baseline levels in both groups (P = .19 and P = .09, respectively).
CONCLUSION: During contact lens-assisted CXL, HPMC-based riboflavin seemed to be associated with a deeper demarcation line than dextran-based riboflavin, although both solutions were safe for the endothelium at 6 months.
Copyright © 2017 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29120712     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.07.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  5 in total

1.  Depth-Dependent Reduction of Biomechanical Efficacy of Contact Lens-Assisted Corneal Cross-linking Analyzed by Brillouin Microscopy.

Authors:  Hongyuan Zhang; Mehdi Roozbahani; Andre L Piccinini; Oren Golan; Farhad Hafezi; Giuliano Scarcelli; J Bradley Randleman
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  The efficiency and safety of oxygen-supplemented accelerated transepithelial corneal cross-linking.

Authors:  Emre Aydın; Mehmet Gökhan Aslan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Corneal collagen crosslinking in patients treated with dextran versus isotonic hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) riboflavin solution: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Patrick B Rapuano; Priya M Mathews; George J Florakis; Stephen L Trokel; Leejee H Suh
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2018-09-10

Review 4.  Contact lens assisted corneal cross linking in thin ectatic corneas - A review.

Authors:  Sanjana Srivatsa; Soosan Jacob; Amar Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 5.  Therapeutic Ophthalmic Lenses: A Review.

Authors:  N Toffoletto; B Saramago; A P Serro
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 6.321

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.