| Literature DB >> 29120571 |
Andrea Delgado1,2, Guillermo Llerena1, Rosmary Lopez3, Jimmy Portella1, Naomi Inoue1, Luis Noriega-Hoces1,2, Luis Guzman1,3.
Abstract
PGD for HLA typing is a procedure that can be performed when an affected child requires a transplant to treat a non-hereditary disorder related to the hematopoietic and/or immune system. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from an HLA-identical donor provides the best treatment option. Three conventional ovarian stimulation procedures for IVF were performed in a couple with a 10-year-old child diagnosed with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia of high risk. Trophectoderm biopsy and aCGH examination were performed on 15 blastocysts, three on the first IVF procedure, four on the second cycle, and eight on the third. Three euploid blastocysts HLA-compatible with the genome of the affected child were identified. One euploid blastocyst HLA-compatible with the affected child was warmed and transferred, resulting in an HLA-matched live birth. In conclusion, combined aCGH for aneuploidy screening and Karyomapping may be performed in a single biopsy procedure.Entities:
Keywords: HLA matching; aCGH; karyomapping
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29120571 PMCID: PMC5714608 DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20170063
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JBRA Assist Reprod ISSN: 1517-5693
A summary of the clinical IVF cycle outcome.
| N° of cycles | I | II | III | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N° oocytes retrieved | 34 | 28 | 33 | 95 |
| N° of mature oocytes (%) | 17 (50%) | 16 (57%) | 26 (79%) | 59 (62%) |
| N° of zygotes | 8 | 10 | 18 | 36 |
| % of oocyte fertilized | 47.05 % | 62.5 % | 69.23 % | 61.02 % |
| N° of biopsied blastocyst | 3 | 4 | 8 | 15 |
| % of embryos analyzed by aCGH | 37.5 % | 40 % | 44.44 % | 41.65 % |
| Number of euploid blastocyst (%) | 3 (100%) | 1 (25%) | 4 (50%) | 8 (53%) |
| N° of HLA-matched embryos | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 (20%) |
aCGH results from all analyzed blastocysts.
| Emb | XY | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 15 | 17 | 13 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | XY | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ABNORMAL, MONOSOMY 19 |
| 10 | XY | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | ABNORMAL COMPLEX |
| 11 | XY | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ABNORMAL, TRISOMY 17 |
| 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 16 | XX | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ABNORMAL, TRISOMY 16 |
| 22 | XX | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | ABNORMAL, TRISOMY 22 |
| 23 | XX | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | ABNORMAL, TRISOMY 22 |
| 24 | XY | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | ABNORMAL, TRISOMY 10 AND 20 |
Individuals reported as compatible in Karyomapping were grouped as P1 (paternal origin) and M1 (maternal origin).
| HLA - RESULTS | INTERPRETATION | |
|---|---|---|
| Father | N/A | |
| Predicted phase | P1/ | |
| Mother | N/A | |
| Predicted phase | Ml/ | |
| Son | N/A | |
| Predicted phase | Ml/Pl | |
HLA Key:
M1 represents SNPs supporting MATERNAL COMPATIBLE PHASE
P1 represents SNPs supporting PATERNAL COMPATIBLE PHASE
M1 in bold represents SNPs supporting MATERNAL NON-COMPATIBLE PHASE
P1 in bold represents SNPs supporting PATERNAL NON-COMPATIBLE PHASE
HLA-matching results for all euploid embryos. This information includes the predictive phase, in which solely the M1/P1 pattern is considered for purposes of interpreting embryo compatibility.
| HLA-RESULTS | INTERPRETATION | |
|---|---|---|
| Predicted phase | M1, P1 | |
| Supporting Evidence | 53 key SNP5 support M1 | |
| 23 key SNPs support P1 | ||
| Predicted phase | M1, P1 | |
| Supporting Evidence | 72 key SNPs support M1 | |
| 25 key SNFs support P1 | ||
| 12 | NON-COMPATIBLE | |
| Predicted phase | ||
| Supporting Evidence | 55 key SNPs support | |
| 30 key SNFs support P1 | ||
| 14 | ||
| Predicted phase | M1, P1 | |
| Supporting Evidence | 63 key SNPS support Ml | |
| 21 key SNFS support P1 | ||
| 19 | NON-COMPATIBLE | |
| Predicted phase | ||
| Supporting Evidence | 54 key SNPs support | |
| 41 key SNFs support | ||
| 20 | NON-COMPATIBLE | |
| Predicted phase | ||
| Supporting Evidence | 53 key SNPs support | |
| 24 key SNPs support P1 | ||
| 21 | NON-COMPATIBLE | |
| Predicted phase | ||
| Supporting Evidence | 47 key SNPs support | |
| 37 key SNPs support | ||
| 25 | NON-COMPATIBLE | |
| Predicted phase | ||
| Supporting Evidence | 55 key SNPs support | |
| 25 key SNPs support P1 | ||