| Literature DB >> 29120374 |
Hoyeol Kim1, Zhichao Liu2,3, Weilong Cong4, Hong-Chao Zhang5,6.
Abstract
AISI 4140 powder was directly deposited on AISI 4140 wrought substrate using laser engineered net shaping (LENS) to investigate the compatibility of a LENS-deposited part with the substrate. Tensile testing at room temperature was performed to evaluate the interface bond performance and fracture behavior of the test specimens. All the samples failed within the as-deposited zone, indicating that the interfacial bond is stronger than the interlayer bond inside the deposit. The fracture surfaces were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy disperse X-ray spectrometry (EDS). Results show that the tensile fracture failure of the as-deposited part is primarily affected by lack-of-fusion defects, carbide precipitation, and oxide particles inclusions, which causes premature failure of the deposit by deteriorating the mechanical properties and structural integrity.Entities:
Keywords: carbides precipitation; fractography; lack-of-fusion defects; laser engineered net shaping; oxide formation; tensile test
Year: 2017 PMID: 29120374 PMCID: PMC5706230 DOI: 10.3390/ma10111283
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Illustration of the LENSTM system employed in the experiment.
Figure 2(a) Cylinder-shaped pillar after LENS deposition and (b) the dimensions of the hybrid test specimen after machining.
Figure 3(a) Hybrid specimens that fractured at as-deposited zone indicated by dotted circles after tensile testing and (b) the corresponding stress-strain curves.
Tensile properties comparison between hybrid samples and the wrought counterpart.
| Material | UTS (MPa) | YS (MPa) | Elongation (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hybrid samples in this paper * | 360 ± 170 | 235 ± 75 | 2.3 ± 1.5 |
| AISI 4140 wrought [ | 720 | 655 | 4 |
* Tensile fractures occurred in the as-deposited AISI 4140 zone.
Figure 4Overall fracture morphology of specimen #3 with insufficiently melted powder particles and porosity.
Figure 5(a–c) High magnification views of the fracture surface after tensile testing showing a transgranular quasi-cleavage fracture mode.
Figure 6(a–c) SEM micrographs of the fracture surface (transgranular cleavage areas) for the EDS spot analyses.
Distribution of elemental composition in the corresponding areas indicated in Figure 6a–c (in wt %).
| Spot | C | Si | Mn | S | P | Cr | Mo | Fe | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.30 | 0.31 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.32 | 0.31 | 91.65 | 100.00 |
| 3 | 5.30 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 93.56 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 5.06 | 0.10 | 0.62 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 92.88 | 100.00 |
| 9 | 4.06 | 0.10 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 94.02 | 100.00 |
| Nominal | 0.44 | 0.35 | 1.00 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 1.10 | 0.25 | 96.78 | 100.00 |
Distribution of elemental composition in the corresponding areas indicated in Figure 6a–c (in at %).
| Spot | C | Si | Mn | S | P | Cr | Mo | Fe | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20.55 | 0.40 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.21 | 0.20 | 76.62 | 100.00 |
| 3 | 20.78 | 0.11 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.32 | 0.21 | 78.37 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 19.89 | 0.21 | 0.53 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 78.20 | 100.00 |
| 9 | 16.28 | 0.20 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 81.90 | 100.00 |
Figure 7EDS element mapping on the fracture surface of specimen #3 from Figure 4.
Figure 8(a) SEM micrograph showing oxide inclusions marked by circles; and (b) the EDS spot spectrum of the inclusion marked by an arrow from (a).
Figure 9SEM micrographs showing oxide inclusions (a) overall fracture surface; (b) high magnification of a selected area from (a) marked by a dashed box showing oxide inclusions; and (c–e) EDS spot spectra detected on the corresponding spots marked by circles in (b).
Elemental composition distribution of the oxide particles from EDS analyses on the corresponding spots marked in Figure 8b and Figure 9b (wt %).
| Spot | O | C | Si | Mn | S | P | Cr | Mo | Fe | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 28.50 | 5.07 | 7.51 | 22.92 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 19.68 | 0.00 | 16.13 | 100.00 |
| 13 | 28.10 | 2.56 | 7.79 | 26.46 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 14.97 | 0.00 | 20.10 | 100.00 |
| 14 | 31.96 | 4.13 | 5.75 | 18.15 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 21.07 | 0.00 | 18.85 | 100.00 |
| 15 | 8.90 | 1.82 | 1.11 | 20.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 45.50 | 0.00 | 22.65 | 100.00 |
| Nominal | - | 0.44 | 0.35 | 1.00 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 1.10 | 0.25 | 96.78 | 100.00 |
Elemental composition distribution of the oxide particles from EDS analyses on the corresponding spots marked in Figure 8b and Figure 9b (at %).
| Spot | O | C | Si | Mn | S | P | Cr | Mo | Fe | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 50.10 | 11.82 | 7.58 | 11.72 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 10.61 | 0.00 | 8.08 | 100.00 |
| 13 | 52.10 | 6.29 | 8.18 | 14.26 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 8.49 | 0.00 | 10.69 | 100.00 |
| 14 | 55.23 | 9.46 | 5.63 | 9.15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 11.17 | 0.00 | 9.36 | 100.00 |
| 15 | 23.26 | 6.47 | 1.62 | 15.17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 36.60 | 0.00 | 16.89 | 100.00 |