Literature DB >> 29120216

Bridging the gap: Learning of acoustic nonadjacent dependencies by a songbird.

Jiani Chen1, Carel Ten Cate1.   

Abstract

Many animal species can detect dependencies between adjacent visual or auditory items in a string. Compared with adjacent dependencies, detecting nonadjacent dependencies, as present in linguistic constructions, is more challenging as this requires detecting a relation between items irrespective of the number and nature of the intervening items. There is limited evidence that nonhuman animals can detect such dependencies. An animal group in which such abilities might be expected is songbirds, which have learned songs consisting of a series of vocal elements given in specific sequences. So far no songbird (or other bird species) has been tested for its ability to detect nonadjacent dependencies. We examined whether zebra finches can detect the dependencies between items at the edges of artificially arranged strings of song elements. Zebra finches were trained to discriminate 2 sets of dependent song elements that always appeared in the same order (A and B; C and D), from other element combinations (AD, AC, BD, CB, CA, DB). The element combinations were separated by intervening (I) elements. Subsequent tests revealed that the finches could generalize the learned dependencies over different numbers and types of intervening items. Our findings show that the ability for detecting nonadjacent dependencies is not limited to humans or primates, and lend support to theories that suggest that nonadjacent dependencies can be learned by a nonlinguistic associative learning process. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29120216     DOI: 10.1037/xan0000145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn        ISSN: 2329-8456            Impact factor:   2.478


  7 in total

1.  Zebra finches are sensitive to combinations of temporally distributed features in a model of word recognition.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Knowles; Allison J Doupe; Michael S Brainard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Sound sequences in birdsong: how much do birds really care?

Authors:  Adam R Fishbein; William J Idsardi; Gregory F Ball; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Nonadjacent dependency processing in monkeys, apes, and humans.

Authors:  Stuart K Watson; Judith M Burkart; Steven J Schapiro; Susan P Lambeth; Jutta L Mueller; Simon W Townsend
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 14.136

4.  Are cognition and personality related in budgerigars?

Authors:  Jiani Chen; Lu Chen; Chuan Yan; Zibo Yu; Yuqi Zou; Yue-Hua Sun
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 2.734

Review 5.  Non-adjacent Dependency Learning in Humans and Other Animals.

Authors:  Benjamin Wilson; Michelle Spierings; Andrea Ravignani; Jutta L Mueller; Toben H Mintz; Frank Wijnen; Anne van der Kant; Kenny Smith; Arnaud Rey
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-09-08

Review 6.  Structured Sequence Learning: Animal Abilities, Cognitive Operations, and Language Evolution.

Authors:  Christopher I Petkov; Carel Ten Cate
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-07-29

Review 7.  Evolutionarily conserved neural signatures involved in sequencing predictions and their relevance for language.

Authors:  Yukiko Kikuchi; William Sedley; Timothy D Griffiths; Christopher I Petkov
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2018-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.