Literature DB >> 29119353

Impact of microinvasion on breast cancer mortality in women with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Victoria Sopik1,2, Ping Sun1, Steven A Narod3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a neoplastic proliferation of epithelial cells which is confined within the basement membrane of the mammary ductal-lobular system. It is of interest to determine to what extent the potential to metastasize increases for DCIS patients when the basement membrane is breached (i.e. microinvasion is present).
METHODS: We retrieved the records of 525,395 women who had either first primary DCIS or small (≤ 2.0 cm) node-negative invasive breast cancer in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registries database (1990-2013). For each patient, we extracted information on year of diagnosis, age at diagnosis, tumour size, tumour grade, oestrogen receptor status, use of radiotherapy, type of surgery, cause of death and follow-up time. We classified patients into four groups, according to the size of the invasive component of the primary tumour. We estimated the actuarial rate of breast cancer-specific mortality at ten and 20 years for women in each size category.
RESULTS: We identified 161,394 women with pure DCIS, 13,489 women with microinvasive carcinoma (≤ 0.1 cm of invasion), 153,856 women with invasive cancer 0.2-1.0 cm in size and 196,656 women with invasive cancer 1.1-2.0 cm in size. The 20-year actuarial breast cancer-specific mortality rate was 3.8% for women with pure DCIS, was 6.9% for women with microinvasive carcinoma, was 6.8% for women with invasive cancer 0.2-1.0 cm in size and was 12.1% for women with invasive cancer 1.1-2.0 cm in size. The adjusted hazard ratio for death associated with microinvasive carcinoma (vs. pure DCIS) was 2.00 (95% CI 1.76-2.26; p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: In terms of prognosis, microinvasive cancer more closely resembles small invasive cancer 0.2-1.0 cm) than pure DCIS. For invasive cancers under 1.0 cm, size has little impact on mortality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; DCIS; Microinvasion; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29119353     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4572-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  25 in total

1.  Impact of Age on Locoregional and Distant Recurrence After Mastectomy for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ With or Without Microinvasion.

Authors:  Anita Mamtani; Faina Nakhlis; Stephanie Downs-Canner; Emily C Zabor; Monica Morrow; Tari A King; Kimberly J Van Zee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Imaging features that distinguish pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) from DCIS with microinvasion.

Authors:  Hongli Wang; Jinjiang Lin; Jianguo Lai; Cui Tan; Yaping Yang; Ran Gu; Xiaofang Jiang; Fengtao Liu; Yue Hu; Fengxi Su
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-07-03

3.  The presentation, management and outcome of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with microinvasion (invasion ≤1 mm in size)-results from the UK Sloane Project.

Authors:  Abeer M Shaaban; Bridget Hilton; Karen Clements; David Dodwell; Nisha Sharma; Cliona Kirwan; Elinor Sawyer; Anthony Maxwell; Matthew Wallis; Hilary Stobart; Senthurun Mylvaganam; Janet Litherland; Samantha Brace-McDonnell; Joanne Dulson-Cox; Olive Kearins; Elena Provenzano; Ian O Ellis; Sarah E Pinder; Alastair M Thompson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 9.075

4.  Modern Breast Cancer Surgery 1st Central-Eastern European Professional Consensus Statement on Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Zoltán Mátrai; Péter Kelemen; Csaba Kósa; Róbert Maráz; Attila Paszt; Gábor Pavlovics; Ákos Sávolt; Zsolt Simonka; Dezső Tóth; Miklós Kásler; Andrey Kaprin; Petr Krivorotko; Ferenc Vicko; Piotr Pluta; Agnieszka Kolacinska-Wow; Dawid Murawa; Jerzy Jankau; Slawomir Ciesla; Daniel Dyttert; Martin Sabol; Andrii Zhygulin; Artur Avetisyan; Alexander Bessonov; György Lázár
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.874

Review 5.  Is invasion a necessary step for metastases in breast cancer?

Authors:  Steven A Narod; Victoria Sopik
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Downstaging in opportunistic breast cancer screening in Brazil: a temporal trend analysis.

Authors:  Diama Bhadra Vale; Cassio Cardoso Filho; Julia Yoriko Shinzato; Fernanda Servidoni Spreafico; Partha Basu; Luiz Carlos Zeferino
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Risk factors for lymph node metastasis and the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion: a population-based study.

Authors:  Cong Chen; Shumin Huang; Aihua Huang; Yunlu Jia; Ji Wang; Zeqin Zhang; Misha Mao; Linbo Wang; Jichun Zhou
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Microinvasive Carcinoma versus Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Comparison of Clinicopathological Features and Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Milim Kim; Hyun Jeong Kim; Yul Ri Chung; Eunyoung Kang; Eun-Kyu Kim; Se Hyun Kim; Yu Jung Kim; Jee Hyun Kim; In Ah Kim; So Yeon Park
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.588

9.  Association of a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ With Death From Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Vasily Giannakeas; Victoria Sopik; Steven A Narod
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-09-01

10.  Association of Radiotherapy With Survival in Women Treated for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ With Lumpectomy or Mastectomy.

Authors:  Vasily Giannakeas; Victoria Sopik; Steven A Narod
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.