| Literature DB >> 29118980 |
Katerina Adamkova1, Young-Joo Yi2, Jaroslav Petr3, Tereza Zalmanova1,3, Kristyna Hoskova1,3, Pavla Jelinkova1, Jiri Moravec4, Milena Kralickova5,6, Miriam Sutovsky7, Peter Sutovsky7,8, Jan Nevoral1,5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The histone code is an established epigenetic regulator of early embryonic development in mammals. The lysine residue K9 of histone H3 (H3K9) is a prime target of SIRT1, a member of NAD+-dependent histone deacetylase family of enzymes targeting both histone and non-histone substrates. At present, little is known about SIRT1-modulation of H3K9 in zygotic pronuclei and its association with the success of preimplantation embryo development. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of SIRT1 activity on H3K9 methylation and acetylation in porcine zygotes and the significance of H3K9 modifications for early embryonic development.Entities:
Keywords: Embryonic development; Epigenetics; H3K9 methylation; SIRT1; Sirtuin
Year: 2017 PMID: 29118980 PMCID: PMC5664433 DOI: 10.1186/s40104-017-0214-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Sci Biotechnol ISSN: 1674-9782
Fig. 1Representative image of SIRT1 immunofluorescence in a 22-h zygote. a SIRT1 is exclusively localized in zygote pronuclei. b Yellow arrows indicate the level of signal intensity profiles in the respective maternal and paternal pronuclei. NC: negative control where the primary antibody was omitted. Scale bar represents 50 μm
Fig. 2The effect of resveratrol on H3K9 methylation and acetylation in zygotic pronuclei. a Fluorescent signal intensities relative to signal intensity of vehicle control (= 1) and b representative images of H3K9me3 and H3K9ac in both pronuclei. a,b,c;1,2,3Significant differences in H3K9me3 and H3K9ac, respectively, among experimental groups (P ≤ 0.05). Asterisks indicate paternal pronucleus. Scalebar represents 25 μm
Fig. 3The effect of nicotinamide on H3K9 methylation and acetylation in zygotic pronuclei. a Fluorescent signal intensities relative to vehicle control (= 1) and b representative images of H3K9me3 and H3K9ac in both pronuclei. a,b,c;1,2,3Significant differences in H3K9me3 and H3K9ac, respectively, among experimental groups (P ≤ 0.05). Asterisk indicates paternal pronucleus. Scalebar represents 25 μm
Fig. 4The effect of BML-278 on H3K9 methylation and acetylation in the zygotic pronuclei. a Fluorescent signal intensities relative to vehicle control (= 1) and b representative images of H3K9me3 and H3K9ac in both pronuclei. *#Significant difference between control and treated group (P ≤ 0.05). Asterisk indicates paternal pronucleus. Scalebar represents 25 μm
Fig. 5The effect of sirtinol on H3K9 methylation and acetylation in zygotic pronuclei. a Fluorescent signal intensities relative to vehicle control (= 1) and b representative images of H3K9me3 and H3K9ac in both pronuclei. *#Significant differences between control and treated group (P ≤ 0.05). Asterisk indicates paternal pronucleus. Scalebar represents 25 μm
Embryonic development and blastocyst formation after 144 h IVC with SIRT1 activators or inhibitors
| No. of fertilized oocytes | No. of cleaved oocytes (mean % ± SEM) | No. of blastocysts (mean % ± SEM) | Mean cell No. per blastocyst (mean ± SEM) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMSO, % (v/v) | 0.5 | 38 | 28 (65.9 ± 8.3)a | 2 (5.2 ± 2.9)bc | 36.0 ± 5.0a |
| Resveratrol, μmol/L | 3 | 67 | 47 (67.7 ± 10.6)a | 4 (6.2 ± 2.8)bc | 39.3 ± 11.3a |
| 6.25 | 51 | 36 (69.9 ± 6.4)a | 0 (0.0 ± 0.0)c | – | |
| 12.5 | 50 | 20 (39.2 ± 5.2)b | 0 (0.0 ± 0.0)c | – | |
| Nicotinamide, mmol/L | 2.5 | 50 | 39 (76.7 ± 6.9)a | 7 (16.7 ± 8.8)abc | 30.9 ± 4.2a |
| 5 | 70 | 45 (64.1 ± 1.4)a | 7 (9.7 ± 6.2)bc | 36.7 ± 4.5a | |
| 7.5 | 69 | 45 (66.7 ± 4.6)a | 13 (21.4 ± 8.4)ab | 34.9 ± 3.1a | |
| BML-278, μmol/L | 3 | 68 | 44 (62.7 ± 7.1)a | 18 (32.9 ± 8.1)a | 38.4 ± 4.2a |
| Sirtinol, μmol/L | 10 | 69 | 44 (63.5 ± 4.6)a | 4 (6.5 ± 3.7)bc | 23.5 ± 1.3a |
a,b,cDifferent superscripts within the same column were significantly different at P ≤ 0.05
Fig. 6Quantification of MDM2 signal intensity in 22 h zygotes after treatment with BML-278. a Fluorescent signal intensity of MDM2 was normalized against housekeeping protein GAPDH. b Representative images show MDM2 and GADPH in control and treated zygotes. *Significant difference between control and treated group (P ≤ 0.05). Scalebar represents 50 μm