David P Hall1, Helen Jordan2, Shirjel Alam3, Michael A Gillies2. 1. Department of Military Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine ICT Centre, Birmingham, UK. 2. Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. 3. Department of Cardiology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Focused echocardiography is widely used to assist clinical decision-making in critically ill patients. In the UK, the Focused Intensive Care Echo protocol is recommended by the Intensive Care Society to ensure consistency of approach and guarantee training standards. Concerns remain about the reliability of information attained by non-expert clinicians in focused echocardiography, particularly when this is used to alter clinical management. METHODS: A prospective, observational evaluation of 60 consecutive patients undergoing Focused Intensive Care Echo studies in a single ICU. RESULTS: A complete Focused Intensive Care Echo study was possible in 43/60 scans (72%) and new diagnostic information obtained following 41/60 scans (68%), which lead to a change of clinical management in 28/60 (47%) of cases. In 24/60 (40%) of cases, a full transthoracic study was subsequently undertaken by a fully accredited sonographer. There were no cases where the results from the full study contradicted those from the limited Focused Intensive Care Echo study; additional diagnostic information was attained following 68% of full studies. CONCLUSION: Focused echocardiography using the Focused Intensive Care Echo protocol is feasible and clinically useful in a high proportion of ICU patients. However, many still require additional expert echocardiographic assessment. Focused echocardiography delivered by non-experts is clinically useful in this setting but its limitations must be understood and access to expert assessment should be available.
INTRODUCTION: Focused echocardiography is widely used to assist clinical decision-making in critically ill patients. In the UK, the Focused Intensive Care Echo protocol is recommended by the Intensive Care Society to ensure consistency of approach and guarantee training standards. Concerns remain about the reliability of information attained by non-expert clinicians in focused echocardiography, particularly when this is used to alter clinical management. METHODS: A prospective, observational evaluation of 60 consecutive patients undergoing Focused Intensive Care Echo studies in a single ICU. RESULTS: A complete Focused Intensive Care Echo study was possible in 43/60 scans (72%) and new diagnostic information obtained following 41/60 scans (68%), which lead to a change of clinical management in 28/60 (47%) of cases. In 24/60 (40%) of cases, a full transthoracic study was subsequently undertaken by a fully accredited sonographer. There were no cases where the results from the full study contradicted those from the limited Focused Intensive Care Echo study; additional diagnostic information was attained following 68% of full studies. CONCLUSION: Focused echocardiography using the Focused Intensive Care Echo protocol is feasible and clinically useful in a high proportion of ICU patients. However, many still require additional expert echocardiographic assessment. Focused echocardiography delivered by non-experts is clinically useful in this setting but its limitations must be understood and access to expert assessment should be available.
Authors: Gabriele Via; Arif Hussain; Mike Wells; Robert Reardon; Mahmoud ElBarbary; Vicki E Noble; James W Tsung; Aleksandar N Neskovic; Susanna Price; Achikam Oren-Grinberg; Andrew Liteplo; Ricardo Cordioli; Nitha Naqvi; Philippe Rola; Jan Poelaert; Tatjana Golob Guliĉ; Erik Sloth; Arthur Labovitz; Bruce Kimura; Raoul Breitkreutz; Navroz Masani; Justin Bowra; Daniel Talmor; Fabio Guarracino; Adrian Goudie; Wang Xiaoting; Rajesh Chawla; Maurizio Galderisi; Micheal Blaivas; Tomislav Petrovic; Enrico Storti; Luca Neri; Lawrence Melniker Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Hussein D Kanji; Jessica McCallum; Demetrios Sirounis; Ruth MacRedmond; Robert Moss; John H Boyd Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2014-04-26 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Raoul Breitkreutz; Susanna Price; Holger V Steiger; Florian H Seeger; Hendrik Ilper; Hanns Ackermann; Marcus Rudolph; Shahana Uddin; Markus A Weigand; Edgar Müller; Felix Walcher Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Alexander Levitov; Heidi L Frankel; Michael Blaivas; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Erik Su; David Evans; Douglas T Summerfield; Anthony Slonim; Raoul Breitkreutz; Susanna Price; Matthew McLaughlin; Paul E Marik; Mahmoud Elbarbary Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Paulo Alexandre Marcelino; Susan Marques Marum; Ana Paula Matos Fernandes; Nuno Germano; Mario G Lopes Journal: Eur J Intern Med Date: 2008-11-20 Impact factor: 4.487
Authors: Lauren E Gibson; Gabrielle A White-Dzuro; Patrick J Lindsay; Sheri M Berg; Edward A Bittner; Marvin G Chang Journal: J Intensive Care Date: 2020-12-11
Authors: Mohammed Y Khanji; Fabrizio Ricci; Riyaz S Patel; Anwar A Chahal; Sanjeev Bhattacharyya; Victor Galusko; Jagat Narula; Adrian Ionescu Journal: Prog Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2020-07-10 Impact factor: 8.194