| Literature DB >> 29118443 |
Gea H van der Lee1, Michiel H S Kraak2, Ralf C M Verdonschot3, J Arie Vonk2, Piet F M Verdonschot2,3.
Abstract
Oxygen availability is perceived as an important environmental factor limiting POM decomposition. In shallow wetlands, however, the impact of commonly observed anoxic conditions in the benthic layer on the relative contribution of microbes and invertebrates to POM decomposition remains largely unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine if dissolved oxygen drives benthic-pelagic decomposition pathways in shallow wetlands. Dissolved oxygen concentration, invertebrate community composition, microbial decomposition and invertebrate consumption were measured in the benthic and pelagic layer of 15 permanent drainage ditches. We showed that an increased duration of anoxic conditions in the benthic layer of the ditches was related to increased microbial decomposition in this layer, while invertebrate consumption decreased in the benthic layer and increased in the pelagic layer. The increased invertebrate consumption in the pelagic layer was related to the presence of amphipods. We concluded that anoxic conditions in the benthic layer of shallow wetlands relate to an increase in microbial decomposition and a decrease in invertebrate consumption, as detritivorous invertebrates move to the pelagic layer to consume particulate organic matter. This illustrates that environmental conditions, such as dissolved oxygen, may drive the relative importance of aquatic organisms to ecosystem functioning.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29118443 PMCID: PMC5678150 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-15432-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Boxplot of dissolved oxygen (DO) conditions during 55 days of measurements in the pelagic and benthic layer. Boxes are inter-quartile ranges (25th percentile to 75th percentile); whiskers extend to 1.5 * IQR; dots are outliers. p-values indicate statistical difference between the benthic and pelagic layer are for percent time anoxic, hypoxic and oxic (Mann-Whitney pairwise comparisons; n = 15).
Richness and abundance of invertebrates caught in the benthic and pelagic layer. Statistical difference in richness (number of taxa) and abundance (number of individuals) between the benthic and pelagic layer are presented (paired sampled t-test; n = 15, mean ± sd).
| Invertebrate metric | Benthic layer | Pelagic layer |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richness (number of taxa) | Overall | 19.3 ± 7.1 | 15.7 ± 3.9 | 0.03 |
| Detritivores | 9.5 ± 3.2 | 7.8 ± 1.9 | 0.06 | |
| Abundance (number of individuals) | Overall | 109.3 ± 62.6 | 81.2 ± 31.0 | 0.02 |
| Detritivores | 72.1 ± 42.1 | 49.5 ± 31.2 | 7.72 * 10−3 | |
| Corixids | 31.1 ± 28.8 | 8.1 ± 7.2 | 1.74 * 10−5 | |
| Amphipods | 14.7 ± 12.4 | 21.1 ± 24.1 | 0.12 | |
| Oligochaetes | 5.1 ± 7.7 | 9.0 ± 10.7 | 0.06 | |
| Isopods | 12.4 ± 15.2 | 3.7 ± 5.3 | 1.35 * 10−3 | |
Figure 2Boxplot of loss of DECOTAB mass (mg) after 55 days of exposure in the benthic and pelagic layer, expressed as invertebrate consumption and microbial decomposition. Boxes are inter-quartile ranges (25th percentile to 75th percentile); whiskers extend to 1.5 * IQR; dots are outliers. Different letters indicate statistical difference between DECOTAB mass loss (Kruskal–Wallis test and post-hoc Mann-Whitney pairwise comparisons; n = 15).
Figure 3Relation between anoxic conditions (DO < 0.2 mg/L) in the benthic layer (% of time) and loss of DECOTAB mass (mg) after 55 days of exposure in the benthic and pelagic layer for (a) microbial decomposition, and (b) invertebrate consumption (linear regression; n = 15).
Figure 4Relation between number of amphipods (log10(x + 1)) and loss of DECOTAB mass (mg) after 55 days of exposure in the benthic and pelagic layer (linear regression; n = 15).
Overview of the physicochemical characteristics of the water column and sediment in the ditches (n = 15, mean ± sd).
| Water column | Sediment | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water temp (°C) | Conductivity (μS/cm) | Tot C (mg/L) | DOC (mg/L) | Tot N (mg/L) |
|
| Cl (mg/L) | C:N ratio | Tot P (mg/g) | Organic matter (%) |
| 8 ± 0.6 | 291 ± 72 | 44.6 ± 9.7 | 20.9 ± 9.3 | 1.3 ± 0.6 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 6.7 ± 4.7 | 16.9 ± 10.4 | 14.5 ± 1.1 | 0.6 ± 0.3 | 17.2 ± 12.8 |