Literature DB >> 29118173

mecC-Harboring Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Hiding in Plain Sight.

Bradley A Ford1.   

Abstract

Previously there was scant data on the performance of laboratory testing to detect mecC-mediated beta-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Kriegeskorte and colleagues (J Clin Microbiol 56:e00826-17, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00826-17) report the performance of various clinical tests for the detection of mecC-harboring methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), which failed to identify from 0 to 41% of tested mecC-harboring MRSA isolates. Changes in practice and new test development are necessary to address the challenge of mecC-harboring MRSA.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2017        PMID： 29118173      PMCID： PMC5744221          DOI： 10.1128/JCM.01549-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN： 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  7 in total

1.  Detection of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type XI carrying highly divergent mecA, mecI, mecR1, blaZ, and ccr genes in human clinical isolates of clonal complex 130 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Anna C Shore; Emily C Deasy; Peter Slickers; Grainne Brennan; Brian O'Connell; Stefan Monecke; Ralf Ehricht; David C Coleman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying the novel mecC gene in Denmark corroborates a zoonotic reservoir with transmission to humans.

Authors:  A Petersen; M Stegger; O Heltberg; J Christensen; A Zeuthen; L K Knudsen; T Urth; M Sorum; L Schouls; J Larsen; R Skov; A R Larsen
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 8.067

3.  Phenotypic detection of mecC-MRSA: cefoxitin is more reliable than oxacillin.

Authors:  Robert Skov; Anders Rhod Larsen; Angela Kearns; Mark Holmes; Christopher Teale; Giles Edwards; Robert Hill
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 4.  Factors influencing methicillin resistance in staphylococci.

Authors:  Brigitte Berger-Bächi; Susanne Rohrer
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 2.552

5.  Comparison of Different Phenotypic Approaches To Screen and Detect mecC-Harboring Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  André Kriegeskorte; Evgeny A Idelevich; Andreas Schlattmann; Franziska Layer; Birgit Strommenger; Olivier Denis; Gavin K Paterson; Mark A Holmes; Guido Werner; Karsten Becker
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with a novel mecA homologue in human and bovine populations in the UK and Denmark: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Laura García-Álvarez; Matthew T G Holden; Heather Lindsay; Cerian R Webb; Derek F J Brown; Martin D Curran; Enid Walpole; Karen Brooks; Derek J Pickard; Christopher Teale; Julian Parkhill; Stephen D Bentley; Giles F Edwards; E Kirsty Girvan; Angela M Kearns; Bruno Pichon; Robert L R Hill; Anders Rhod Larsen; Robert L Skov; Sharon J Peacock; Duncan J Maskell; Mark A Holmes
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 25.071

7.  Use of Vitek 2 antimicrobial susceptibility profile to identify mecC in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Edward J P Cartwright; Gavin K Paterson; Kathy E Raven; Ewan M Harrison; Theodore Gouliouris; Angela Kearns; Bruno Pichon; Giles Edwards; Robert L Skov; Anders R Larsen; Mark A Holmes; Julian Parkhill; Sharon J Peacock; M Estée Török
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 5.948
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.