Literature DB >> 29117734

Risk factors for a delay in medical education: Results of an online survey among four German medical schools.

Jens Walldorf1, Martin R Fischer2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Delayed study progress in medical school is a challenging issue for the tax paying community, the faculty and the medical students themselves. Reasons for a delay might be different from known risk factors for academic difficulties.
METHODS: An online survey regarding delays in the study progress and including a personality test (BFI-10) was presented to medical students from four German medical schools after completion of their 3rd year of study.
RESULTS: Of 617 students, 51.2% reported a mean delay of 2.1 ± 1.5 semesters. Frequent risk factors were secondary employment (69.5%, odds ratio (OR) 1.7, p = 0.004), female gender (69.8%, OR 1.6, p = 0.007), work or study abroad (35.9%, OR 1.5, p = 0.02), a late graduation (5.9%, OR 2.4, p = 0.02), as well as support through scholarship or mentoring (19.9%, OR 1.8, p = 0.004). "Working on doctoral thesis" (11.3%, OR 1.9, p = 0.03) and structural curricular issues (36.6%, OR 0.9, p = 0.7) were frequently identified as obstacles. "Support by friends/family" was considered helpful by 24.1% (OR 1.4, p = 0.09), as well as a high intrinsic motivation (19.1%, OR 0.5, p = 0.01). In the BFI-10, students with study delay were more prone to openness and agreeableness.
CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for delay are not identical to those for academic difficulties. To decrease the risk for delays, firm curricular structures should be identified and alleviated. Intrinsic motivation is a strong impetus of study progress and additionally might be strengthened by curricular changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29117734     DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1395000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  2 in total

Review 1.  Use of Personality Frameworks in Health Science Education.

Authors:  Lindsey Childs-Kean; Mary Edwards; Mary Douglass Smith
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Script concordance test acceptability and utility for assessing medical students' clinical reasoning: a user's survey and an institutional prospective evaluation of students' scores.

Authors:  Jean-Daniel Kün-Darbois; Cédric Annweiler; Nicolas Lerolle; Souhil Lebdai
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 2.463

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.