Literature DB >> 29117447

Toxic reagents and expensive equipment: are they really necessary for the extraction of good quality fungal DNA?

P Rodrigues1, A Venâncio2, N Lima2.   

Abstract

The aim of this work was to evaluate a fungal DNA extraction procedure with the lowest inputs in terms of time as well as of expensive and toxic chemicals, but able to consistently produce genomic DNA of good quality for PCR purposes. Two types of fungal biological material were tested - mycelium and conidia - combined with two protocols for DNA extraction using Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate (SDS) and Cetyl Trimethyl Ammonium Bromide as extraction buffers and glass beads for mechanical disruption of cell walls. Our results showed that conidia and SDS buffer was the combination that lead to the best DNA quality and yield, with the lowest variation between samples. This study clearly demonstrates that it is possible to obtain high yield and pure DNA from pigmented conidia without the use of strong cell disrupting procedures and of toxic reagents. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: There are numerous methods for DNA extraction from fungi. Some rely on expensive commercial kits and/or equipments, unavailable for many laboratories, or make use of toxic chemicals such as chloroform, phenol and mercaptoethanol. This study clearly demonstrates that it is possible to obtain high yields of pure DNA from pigmented conidia without the use of strong and expensive cell disrupting procedures and of toxic reagents. The method herein described is simultaneously inexpensive and adequate to DNA extraction from several different types of fungi.
© 2017 The Society for Applied Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Aspergilluszzm321990; zzm321990PCRzzm321990; DNA extraction; fungi; genomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29117447     DOI: 10.1111/lam.12822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 0266-8254            Impact factor:   2.858


  5 in total

1.  Mycobiota and mycotoxins in Portuguese pork, goat and sheep dry-cured hams.

Authors:  Paula Rodrigues; Diana Silva; Pedro Costa; Luís Abrunhosa; Armando Venâncio; Alfredo Teixeira
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2019-09-08       Impact factor: 3.833

2.  A phenol/chloroform-free method to extract nucleic acids from recalcitrant, woody tropical species for gene expression and sequencing.

Authors:  François F Barbier; Tinashe G Chabikwa; Muhammad U Ahsan; Stacey E Cook; Rosanna Powell; Milos Tanurdzic; Christine A Beveridge
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 4.993

Review 3.  Recent developments and trends of automatic nucleic acid detection systems.

Authors:  Xujun Yuan; Guodong Sui; Dawei Zhang; Min Chen; Wang Zhao
Journal:  J Biosaf Biosecur       Date:  2022-02-28

Review 4.  Engineering a sustainable future for point-of-care diagnostics and single-use microfluidic devices.

Authors:  Alfredo Edoardo Ongaro; Zibusiso Ndlovu; Elodie Sollier; Collins Otieno; Pascale Ondoa; Alice Street; Maïwenn Kersaudy-Kerhoas
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 7.517

5.  Comprehensive Assessment of the Virulence Factors sub 3, sub 6 and mcpA in the Zoonotic Dermatophyte Trichophyton benhamiae Using FISH and qPCR.

Authors:  Christina-Marie Baumbach; Antje Rückner; Lena Partusch; Eric Engel; Wieland Schrödl; Jule Kristin Michler
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.