Literature DB >> 29117398

Australian Regulation of Animal Use in Science and Education: A Critical Appraisal.

Aaron C Timoshanko1, Helen Marston1, Brett A Lidbury1.   

Abstract

One of the touchstone principles in Australia's regulation of the use of animals for scientific and educational purposes is reduction, refinement and replacement (3Rs). However, the use of animals for scientific and educational purposes is increasing in Australia, raising concerns about the effectiveness of the current regulatory framework in achieving the objectives of the 3Rs. This article critically evaluates the current regulatory framework in Australia. Several strengths are identified. However, 4 recommendations to improve the regulatory environment are proposed to bring Australia in line with international best practice. Specifically, Australian regulation governing the use of animals for scientific or educational purposes could be improved through greater transparency, higher standards of competency, the development of a central regulatory authority, and greater incentives to encourage research and development into nonanimal alternatives.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research. All rights reserved.For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  3Rs; Australia; animal research; animal testing; regulation; replacement; scientific or educational animal use

Year:  2016        PMID: 29117398     DOI: 10.1093/ilar/ilw015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ILAR J        ISSN: 1084-2020


  1 in total

Review 1.  Animal Models in Forensic Science Research: Justified Use or Ethical Exploitation?

Authors:  Calvin Gerald Mole; Marise Heyns
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 3.525

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.