Literature DB >> 29117383

Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2013: results generated from European registers by ESHRE.

C Calhaz-Jorge1,2, C De Geyter2,3, M S Kupka2,4, J de Mouzon2,5, K Erb2,6, E Mocanu2,7, T Motrenko2,8, G Scaravelli2,9, C Wyns2,10, V Goossens2.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Are there any changes in the treatments involving ART and IUI initiated in Europe during 2013 compared with previous years? SUMMARY ANSWER: An increase in the overall number of ART cycles resulting from a higher number of countries reporting data was evident, the pregnancy rates (PRs) in 2013 remained stable compared with those reported in 2012, the number of transfers with multiple embryos (3+) was lower than ever before yet the multiple delivery rates (DRs) remained unchanged, and IUI activity and success rates were similar to those of last years. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Since 1997, ART data in Europe have been collected and reported in 16 manuscripts, published in Human Reproduction. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Retrospective data collection of European ART data by the European IVF-monitoring Consortium for ESHRE. Data for cycles between 1 January and 31 December 2013 were collected from National Registers, when existing, or on a voluntary basis by personal information. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTINGS,
METHODS: From 38 countries (+4 compared with 2012), 1169 clinics reported 686 271 treatment cycles including 144 299 of IVF, 330 367 of ICSI, 154 712 of frozen embryo replacement (FER), 40 244 of egg donation (ED), 247 of IVM, 9791 of PGD/PGS and 6611 of frozen oocyte replacements. European data on intrauterine insemination using husband/partner's semen (IUI-H) and donor semen (IUI-D) were reported from 1095 IUI labs in 22 countries. A total of 175 467 IUI-H and 43 785 IUI-D cycles were included. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In 17 countries where all clinics reported to their ART register, a total of 374 177 ART cycles were performed in a population of around 310 million inhabitants, corresponding to 1175 cycles per million inhabitants (range, 235-2703 cycles per million inhabitants). For all IVF cycles, the clinical PRs per aspiration and per transfer were stable with 29.6% (29.4% in 2012) and 34.5% (33.8% in 2012), respectively. For ICSI, the corresponding rates also were stable with 27.8% (27.8% in 2012) and 32.9% (32.3% in 2012). In FER-cycles, the PR per thawing/warming increased to 27.0% (23.1% in 2012). In ED cycles, the PR per fresh transfer increased to 49.8% (48.4% in 2012), to 38.5% (35.9% in 2012) per thawed transfer, and to 46.4% for transfers after FOR (45.1% in 2012). The DRs after IUI remained stable at 8.6% (8.5% in 2012) after IUI-H and was slightly lower after IUI-D (11.1% versus 12.0% in 2012). In IVF and ICSI cycles, 1, 2, 3 and 4+ embryos were transferred in 31.4, 56.3, 11.5, and 1.0% of the cycles, respectively (corresponding numbers were 30.2, 55.4, 13.3 and 1.1% in 2012). The proportions of singleton, twin and triplet deliveries after IVF and ICSI (added together) were 82., 17.5 and 0.5%, respectively, resulting in a total multiple DR of 18.0% compared to 17.9% in 2012. In FER-cycles, the multiple DR was 12.8% (12.5% twins and 0.3% triplets), nearly the same as in 2012 (12.5, 12.2 and 0.3% respectively). Twin and triplet DRs associated with IUI cycles were 9.5%/0.6% and 7.5%/0.3%, following treatment with husband/donor semen, respectively. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The method of reporting varies among countries, and registers from a number of countries have been unable to provide some of the relevant data such as initiated cycles and deliveries. As long as data are incomplete and generated through different methods of collection, the results should be interpreted with caution. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: The 17th ESHRE report on ART shows a continuing expansion of the number of treatment cycles in Europe, with more than 685 000 cycles reported in 2013 and an increasing contribution to birth rate in many countries. However, the need to improve and standardize the national registries, and to establish validation methodologies, remains manifest. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study has no external funding; all costs are covered by ESHRE. There are no competing interests.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  Europe; ICSI; IUI using donor semen; IUI using husband/partner's semen; IVF; egg donation; frozen embryo replacement; insemination; register; registry

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29117383     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  81 in total

1.  [Effect of serum estradiol level before progesterone administration on pregnancy outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles].

Authors:  Ling Deng; Xin Chen; De-Sheng Ye; Shi-Ling Chen
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-05-20

2.  Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and childhood cancer: is the risk real?

Authors:  Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti; Pasquale Patrizio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Intake of Antioxidants in Relation to Infertility Treatment Outcomes with Assisted Reproductive Technologies.

Authors:  Ming-Chieh Li; Feiby L Nassan; Yu-Han Chiu; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Paige L Williams; Irene Souter; Russ Hauser; Jorge E Chavarro
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 4.  Child Health: Is It Really Assisted Reproductive Technology that We Need to Be Concerned About?

Authors:  Edwina H Yeung; Keewan Kim; Alexandra Purdue-Smithe; Griffith Bell; Jessica Zolton; Akhgar Ghassabian; Yassaman Vafai; Sonia L Robinson; Sunni L Mumford
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 1.303

5.  A microwell culture system that allows group culture and is compatible with human single media.

Authors:  Shoko Ieda; Tomonori Akai; Yoko Sakaguchi; Sumi Shimamura; Atsushi Sugawara; Masahiro Kaneda; Satoko Matoba; Masanori Kagota; Satoshi Sugimura; Hirotsune Kaijima
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Oviductal glycoprotein 1 (OVGP1) is expressed by endometrial epithelium that regulates receptivity and trophoblast adhesion.

Authors:  Saniya Laheri; Nancy Ashary; Purvi Bhatt; Deepak Modi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Cross border reproductive care (CBRC): a growing global phenomenon with multidimensional implications (a systematic and critical review).

Authors:  Mahmoud Salama; Vladimir Isachenko; Evgenia Isachenko; Gohar Rahimi; Peter Mallmann; Lynn M Westphal; Marcia C Inhorn; Pasquale Patrizio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Fertility technologies and how to optimize laboratory performance to support the shortening of time to birth of a healthy singleton: a Delphi consensus.

Authors:  Giovanni Coticchio; Barry Behr; Alison Campbell; Marcos Meseguer; Dean E Morbeck; Valerio Pisaturo; Carlos E Plancha; Denny Sakkas; Yanwen Xu; Thomas D'Hooghe; Evelyn Cottell; Kersti Lundin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Transcriptomic changes and potential regulatory mechanism of intrauterine human chorionic gonadotropin co-cultured with peripheral blood mononuclear cells infusion in mice with embryonic implantation dysfunction.

Authors:  Jiao Chen; Xuehan Zhao; Liangfei Ao; Tailang Yin; Jing Yang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-02

10.  Cost-effectiveness of medically assisted reproduction or expectant management for unexplained subfertility: when to start treatment?

Authors:  R van Eekelen; M J Eijkemans; M Mochtar; F Mol; B W Mol; H Groen; M van Wely
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.