| Literature DB >> 29117250 |
Mingwei Zhang1, Hui Wang2, Yuan Yi1, Jinfeng Ding1, Min Zhu1, Chunyan Li1, Wenshan Guo1, Chaonian Feng1, Xinkai Zhu1.
Abstract
Lodging is one of the constraints that limit wheat yields and quality due to the unexpected bending or breaking stems on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production worldwide. In addition to choosing lodging resistance varieties, husbandry practices also have a significant effect on lodging. Nitrogen management is one of the most common and efficient methods. A field experiment with Yangmai 20 as research material (a widely-used variety) was conducted to study the effects of different nitrogen levels and ratios on culm morphological, anatomical characters and chemical components and to explore the nitrogen application techniques for lodging tolerance and high yield. Results showed that some index of basal internodes, such as stem wall thickness, filling degree, lignin content, cellulose content, water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and WSC/N ratio, were positively and significantly correlated with culm lodging-resistant index (CLRI). As the increase of nitrogen level and basal nitrogen ratio, the basal internodes became slender and fragile with the thick stem wall, while filling degree, chemical components and the strength of the stem decreased gradually, which significantly increased the lodging risk. The response of grain yield to nitrogen doses was quadratic and grain yield reached the highest at the nitrogen ratio of 50%:10%:20%:20% (the ratio of nitrogen amount applied before sowing, at tillering stage, jointing stage and booting stage respectively, abbreviated as 5:1:2:2). These results suggested that for Yangmai 20, the planting density of 180×104ha-1, nitrogen level of 225 kg ha-1, and the ratio of 5: 1: 2: 2 effectively increased lodging resistance and grain yield. This combination of planting density and nitrogen level and ratio could effectively relieve the contradiction between high-yielding and anti-lodging.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29117250 PMCID: PMC5695594 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187543
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Daily temperature and rainfall regimes during growing season at the experimental site in 2012–2013 (a) and 2013–2014 (b).
Effect of nitrogen levels and ratios on apparent lodging rate, lodging score and grain yield.
| Year | N level (kg ha -1) | N ratio | Lodging stage | Lodging angle (°) | Lodging rate (%) | Lodging score | Spikes (104 per ha-1) | Kernels per spike | 1000-kernels weight (g) | Grain yield (kg ha -1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012–2013 | 180 | 7:1:2:0 | NL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 447.08d | 44.02ab | 38.88bc | 7072.22d |
| 5:1:2:2 | DC83 | 15 | 10 | 1.67 | 494.72abc | 41.19bc | 40.72a | 7708.33abc | ||
| 3:1:3:3 | NL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 462.50cd | 42.92abc | 40.18ab | 7391.67bcd | ||
| 225 | 7:1:2:0 | DC83 | 70 | 40 | 32.22 | 506.67ab | 44.58a | 35.28de | 7233.33cd | |
| 5:1:2:2 | DC87 | 20 | 17.5 | 3.89 | 533.33a | 45.34a | 36.03d | 8075.00a | ||
| 3:1:3:3 | NL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 477.50bcd | 45.73a | 38.67c | 7916.67ab | ||
| 270 | 7:1:2:0 | DC75 | 72.5 | 80 | 71.11 | 509.72ab | 40.34c | 34.10e | 6950.00d | |
| 5:1:2:2 | NL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 507.50ab | 43.03abc | 35.99d | 7775.00ab | ||
| 3:1:3:3 | NL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 497.22abc | 40.78c | 36.65d | 7400.00bcd | ||
| 2013–2014 | 180 | 7:1:2:0 | DC65 | 50 | 32.5 | 18.06 | 452.24d | 41.95b | 37.75ab | 7091.67cd |
| 5:1:2:2 | DC65 | 45 | 15 | 7.5 | 478.36bc | 42.68ab | 37.58b | 7650.00abc | ||
| 3:1:3:3 | DC73 | 20 | 15 | 3.33 | 451.69d | 43.86ab | 39.01a | 7633.33abc | ||
| 225 | 7:1:2:0 | DC65 | 72.5 | 55 | 44.31 | 484.47bc | 43.75ab | 36.51b | 7216.67bcd | |
| 5:1:2:2 | DC65 | 65 | 22.5 | 16.25 | 508.91a | 43.40ab | 36.81b | 7833.33a | ||
| 3:1:3:3 | DC65 | 40 | 12.5 | 5.56 | 500.03ab | 44.52ab | 37.05b | 7933.33a | ||
| 270 | 7:1:2:0 | DC65 | 85 | 65 | 57.78 | 469.20cd | 43.57ab | 36.92b | 6991.67d | |
| 5:1:2:2 | DC65 | 77.5 | 55 | 44.31 | 474.19cd | 44.73a | 37.48b | 7791.67ab | ||
| 3:1:3:3 | DC65 | 70 | 55 | 41.25 | 464.47cd | 44.66ab | 37.73ab | 7519.44abcd |
α NL: No lodging; DC65: Anthesis; DC73: Early milk stage; DC75: Medium milk stage; DC83: Early dough stage; DC87: Hard dough stage
β Values in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05 as determined by the LSD test. The test was conducted separately between the two years.
Effect of nitrogen levels and ratios on culm breaking strength and culm lodging resistance index.
| N level (kg ha -1) | N ratio | 2012–2013 | 2013–2014 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lodging score | Culm breaking strength(Newtons) | Culm lodging resistance index | Lodging score | Culm breaking strength(Newtons) | Culm lodging resistance index | ||
| 180 | 7:1:2:0 | 0 | 13.57abc | 25.81ab | 18.06 | 13.84ab | 26.00ab |
| 5:1:2:2 | 1.67 | 16.36a | 32.02a | 7.5 | 15.52a | 29.43a | |
| 3:1:3:3 | 0 | 16.74a | 33.01a | 3.33 | 15.49a | 29.83a | |
| 225 | 7:1:2:0 | 32.22 | 12.10bc | 23.24b | 44.31 | 12.77ab | 24.06ab |
| 5:1:2:2 | 3.89 | 15.32abc | 29.72ab | 16.25 | 14.39ab | 27.12ab | |
| 3:1:3:3 | 0 | 15.78ab | 30.84ab | 5.56 | 15.21a | 28.91ab | |
| 270 | 7:1:2:0 | 71.11 | 11.81c | 22.43b | 57.78 | 11.19b | 20.83b |
| 5:1:2:2 | 0 | 12.99abc | 25.28ab | 44.31 | 12.60ab | 23.48ab | |
| 3:1:3:3 | 0 | 13.15abc | 25.63ab | 41.25 | 13.16ab | 24.40ab | |
| F | |||||||
| Nitrogen levels(NL) | 9.85 | 8.46 | 7.34 | 8.84 | |||
| Nitrogen ratio(NR) | 10.16 | 10.40 | 0.99 | 4.99 | |||
| NL×NR | 0.69 | 0.56 | 1.96 | 0.07 | |||
α Values in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05 as determined by the LSD test. The test was conducted separately between the two years.
* F-test significant at 5% level.
** F-test significant at 1% level.
Fig 2Effect of nitrogen levels and ratios on pushing resistance.
Different letters on the culm mean significant difference among the treatments at P < 0.05 as determined by the LSD test. The test was conducted separately between the two years.
Effect of nitrogen levels and ratios on plant height and length of basal internodes.
| N level (kg ha-1) | N ratio | 2012–2013 | 2013–2014 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length of basal internodes (cm) | Plant height (cm) | Length of basal internodes/Plant height (%) | Length of basal internodes (cm) | Plant height (cm) | Length of basal internodes/Plant height (%) | ||||
| I | II | I | II | ||||||
| 180 | 7:1:2:0 | 6.71abc | 10.63ab | 90.54a | 18.06ab | 5.72abc | 9.53b | 92.34a | 18.11ab |
| 5:1:2:2 | 6.44bc | 10.48ab | 90.93a | 17.56ab | 5.49bc | 9.48b | 92.79a | 17.66ab | |
| 3:1:3:3 | 5.99c | 10.46b | 91.27a | 17.11b | 5.16c | 9.45b | 93.47a | 17.18b | |
| 225 | 7:1:2:0 | 7.02ab | 10.84ab | 91.54a | 18.32a | 5.92ab | 10.13ab | 93.63a | 18.86ab |
| 5:1:2:2 | 6.57bc | 10.61ab | 91.68a | 17.69ab | 5.61abc | 9.78b | 94.64a | 17.77ab | |
| 3:1:3:3 | 6.08c | 10.48b | 92.02a | 17.36ab | 5.49bc | 9.71b | 94.25a | 17.20b | |
| 270 | 7:1:2:0 | 7.50a | 10.93a | 92.09a | 18.45a | 6.06a | 10.71a | 95.25a | 19.69a |
| 5:1:2:2 | 7.33ab | 10.65ab | 92.06a | 17.96ab | 5.88ab | 9.79b | 95.70a | 18.45ab | |
| 3:1:3:3 | 6.70abc | 10.48b | 93.04a | 17.18b | 5.51abc | 9.92ab | 96.30a | 17.76ab | |
| F | |||||||||
| Nitrogen levels(NL) | 14.44 | 2.87 | 5.30 | 1.28 | 6.94 | 8.15 | 4.85 | 4.40 | |
| Nitrogen ratio(NR) | 14.26 | 11.11 | 1.35 | 16.39 | 14.08 | 5.31 | 0.55 | 10.01 | |
| NL×NR | 0.19 | 0.70 | 0.16 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 2.26 | 0.03 | 0.44 | |
α Values in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05 as determined by the LSD test. The test was conducted separately between the two years.
* F-test significant at 5% level.
** F-test significant at 1% level.
Effect of nitrogen levels and ratios on diameter, wall thickness and filling degree of basal internodes.
| N level (kg ha -1) | N ratio | 2012–2013 | 2013–2014 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter (mm) | Wall thickness (mm) | Filling degree (mg DW cm-2) | Diameter (mm) | Wall thickness (mm) | Filling degree (mg DW cm-2) | ||||||||
| I | II | I | II | I | II | I | II | I | II | I | II | ||
| 180 | 7:1:2:0 | 4.20ab | 4.56a | 0.62ab | 0.55ab | 23.34ab | 22.91abc | 4.51ab | 4.96a | 0.60abc | 0.53b | 22.10abc | 21.20ab |
| 5:1:2:2 | 4.49ab | 4.86a | 0.65ab | 0.63a | 28.80ab | 30.28abc | 4.58ab | 5.06a | 0.63abc | 0.55ab | 26.07ab | 25.75a | |
| 3:1:3:3 | 4.60a | 4.89a | 0.66a | 0.63a | 34.45a | 33.69a | 4.83a | 5.17a | 0.69a | 0.61a | 26.49a | 25.37ab | |
| 225 | 7:1:2:0 | 4.15ab | 4.55a | 0.58ab | 0.53b | 22.00b | 20.71bc | 4.46ab | 4.94a | 0.58bc | 0.55ab | 20.58bc | 20.86ab |
| 5:1:2:2 | 4.57a | 4.80a | 0.64ab | 0.63a | 28.13ab | 28.52abc | 4.57ab | 4.96a | 0.61abc | 0.57ab | 24.65ab | 24.07ab | |
| 3:1:3:3 | 4.60a | 4.85a | 0.66a | 0.63a | 32.01ab | 32.09ab | 4.54ab | 4.97a | 0.64ab | 0.58ab | 24.05abc | 23.38ab | |
| 270 | 7:1:2:0 | 4.03b | 4.48a | 0.56b | 0.53b | 20.40b | 20.08c | 4.44b | 4.86a | 0.54c | 0.53b | 18.69c | 19.67b |
| 5:1:2:2 | 4.47ab | 4.80a | 0.61ab | 0.61ab | 26.85ab | 25.66abc | 4.56ab | 4.92a | 0.58bc | 0.53b | 21.41abc | 20.22ab | |
| 3:1:3:3 | 4.52a | 4.77a | 0.62ab | 0.61ab | 29.32ab | 28.68abc | 4.68ab | 4.95a | 0.56bc | 0.53b | 22.13abc | 22.55ab | |
| F | |||||||||||||
| Nitrogen levels(NL) | 1.37 | 0.59 | 5.33 | 0.76 | 1.82 | 2.89 | 2.36 | 4.10 | 7.60 | 6.53 | 12.50 | 7.07 | |
| Nitrogen ratio(NR) | 24.89 | 9.18 | 11.10 | 29.05 | 16.46 | 18.22 | 7.12 | 2.02 | 16.27 | 6.24 | 13.08 | 7.73 | |
| NL×NR | 0.27 | 0.06 | 0.61 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 1.26 | 0.47 | 1.46 | 2.18 | 0.22 | 1.10 | |
α Values in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05 as determined by the LSD test. The test was conducted separately between the two years.
* F-test significant at 5% level.
** F-test significant at 1% level.
Effect of nitrogen levels and ratios on nitrogen content, water-solute carbohydrates and WSC/N of stem.
| N level (kg ha -1) | N ratio | 2012–2013 | 2013–2014 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrogen content (%) | Water-solute carbohydrates (%) | WSC/N | Nitrogen content (%) | Water-solute carbohydrates (%) | WSC/N | ||
| 180 | 7:1:2:0 | 0.680bc | 15.93ab | 23.43ab | 0.703cd | 15.45a | 21.98ab |
| 5:1:2:2 | 0.643c | 17.08a | 26.57a | 0.688d | 16.87a | 24.52a | |
| 3:1:3:3 | 0.634c | 16.62a | 26.21a | 0.672d | 16.32a | 24.29a | |
| 225 | 7:1:2:0 | 0.705abc | 14.30abc | 20.29bc | 0.740abcd | 13.87ab | 18.74bc |
| 5:1:2:2 | 0.678bc | 15.08ab | 22.25ab | 0.712cd | 14.63ab | 20.55ab | |
| 3:1:3:3 | 0.688abc | 16.03ab | 23.30ab | 0.722bcd | 15.55a | 21.52ab | |
| 270 | 7:1:2:0 | 0.789a | 11.35c | 14.38d | 0.797ab | 11.99b | 15.04c |
| 5:1:2:2 | 0.764ab | 13.01bc | 17.03cd | 0.781abc | 13.67ab | 17.51bc | |
| 3:1:3:3 | 0.777ab | 14.59abc | 18.77bcd | 0.809a | 14.15ab | 17.49bc | |
| F | |||||||
| Nitrogen levels(NL) | 26.61 | 21.76 | 54.52 | 34.53 | 15.07 | 38.78 | |
| Nitrogen ratio(NR) | 1.67 | 6.15 | 8.98 | 1.14 | 4.85 | 6.22 | |
| NL×NR | 0.19 | 1.10 | 0.36 | 0.66 | 0.42 | 0.11 | |
α WSC/N: the ratio of water-solute carbohydrates to nitrogen
β Values in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05 as determined by the LSD test. The test was conducted separately between the two years.
* F-test significant at 5% level.
** F-test significant at 1% level.
Fig 3Effect of nitrogen levels and ratios on lignin (a), cellulose (b) and silicon (c).
Different letters on the culm mean significant difference among the treatments at P < 0.05 as determined by the LSD test. The test was conducted separately between the two years.
Phenotypic correlations for culm lodging resistance index, lodging score and culm characters.
| CLRI | LS | PH | L-I | L-II | D-I | D-II | WT-I | WT-II | F-I | F-II | LC | CC | SC | WSC/N | |
| CLRI | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||
| LS | -0.79 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||
| PH | -0.44 | 0.54 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
| L-I | -0.67 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 1.00 | |||||||||||
| L-II | -0.23 | 0.13 | -0.49 | -0.40 | 1.00 | ||||||||||
| D-I | 0.52 | -0.39 | 0.41 | 0.05 | -0.65 | 1.00 | |||||||||
| D-II | 0.40 | -0.22 | 0.49 | 0.30 | -0.83 | 0.91 | 1.00 | ||||||||
| WT-I | 0.90 | -0.87 | -0.46 | -0.69 | -0.22 | 0.51 | 0.38 | 1.00 | |||||||
| WT-II | 0.78 | -0.77 | -0.47 | -0.76 | 0.18 | 0.44 | 0.18 | 0.81 | 1.00 | ||||||
| F-I | 0.85 | -0.80 | -0.49 | -0.81 | 0.09 | 0.42 | 0.17 | 0.80 | 0.90 | 1.00 | |||||
| F-II | 0.86 | -0.75 | -0.47 | -0.78 | 0.13 | 0.43 | 0.17 | 0.77 | 0.90 | 0.98 | 1.00 | ||||
| LC | 0.59 | -0.54 | 0.15 | -0.26 | -0.46 | 0.62 | 0.53 | 0.58 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 1.00 | |||
| CC | 0.66 | -0.68 | -0.13 | -0.52 | -0.20 | 0.43 | 0.28 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.92 | 1.00 | ||
| SC | 0.34 | -0.25 | 0.48 | 0.01 | -0.52 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.28 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.33 | 0.75 | 0.62 | 1.00 | |
| WSC/N | 0.89 | -0.77 | -0.53 | -0.57 | -0.27 | 0.37 | 0.33 | 0.82 | 0.55 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.34 | 0.43 | 0.10 | 1.00 |
α CLRI: culm lodging resistance index; LS: lodging score; PH: plant height; L-I: length of first basal internode; L-II: Length of second basal internode; D-I: diameter of first basal internode; D-II: diameter of second basal internode; WT-I: wall thickness of first basal internode; WT-II: wall thickness of second basal internode; F-I: filling degree of first basal internode; F-II: filling degree of second basal internode; LC: lignin content; CC: cellulose content; SC: silicon content; WSC/N: the ratio of water-solute carbohydrates to nitrogen.
* F-test significant at 5% level.
** F-test significant at 1% level.
Grey relational analysis for culm lodging resistance index and culm characters.
| Culm characters | Grey correlation degree (p = 0.5) | Ranking |
|---|---|---|
| Plant height | 0.345 | 11 |
| Length of first basal internode | 0.299 | 13 |
| Length of second basal internode | 0.343 | 12 |
| Diameter of first basal internode | 0.362 | 9 |
| Diameter of second basal internode | 0.360 | 10 |
| Wall thickness of first basal internode | 0.634 | 1 |
| Wall thickness of second basal internode | 0.550 | 4 |
| Filling degree of first basal internode | 0.550 | 5 |
| Filling degree of second basal internode | 0.562 | 3 |
| Lignin content | 0.485 | 6 |
| Cellulose content | 0.448 | 7 |
| Silicon content | 0.388 | 8 |
| The ratio of water-solute carbohydrates to nitrogen | 0.567 | 2 |