Literature DB >> 29116679

Functional status, healthcare utilization, and the costs of liver transplantation.

Marina Serper1, Therese Bittermann1, Michael Rossi2, David S Goldberg1,3, Arwin M Thomasson4, Kim M Olthoff4, Abraham Shaked4.   

Abstract

The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score predicts higher transplant healthcare utilization and costs; however, the independent contribution of functional status towards costs is understudied. The study objective was to evaluate the association between functional status, as measured by Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and liver transplant (LT) costs in the first posttransplant year. In a cohort of 598 LT recipients from July 1, 2009 to November 30, 2014, multivariable models assessed associations between KPS and outcomes. LT recipients needing full assistance (KPS 10%-40%) vs being independent (KPS 80%-100%) were more likely to be discharged to a rehabilitation facility after LT (22% vs 3%) and be rehospitalized within the first posttransplant year (78% vs 57%), all P < .001. In adjusted generalized linear models, in addition to MELD (P < .001), factors independently associated with higher 1-year post-LT transplant costs were older age, poor functional status (KPS 10%-40%), living donor LT, pre-LT hemodialysis, and the donor risk index (all P < .001). One-year survival for patients in the top cost decile was 83% vs 93% for the rest of the cohort (log rank P < .001). Functional status is an important determinant of posttransplant resource utilization; therefore, standardized measurements of functional status should be considered to optimize candidate selection and outcomes.
© 2017 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  classification systems: Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD); clinical research/practice; comorbidities; economics; health services and outcomes research; hospital readmission; liver transplantation/hepatology; quality of care/care delivery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29116679     DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  10 in total

1.  Functional status at listing predicts waitlist and posttransplant mortality in pediatric liver transplant candidates.

Authors:  Emily R Perito; John Bucuvalas; Jennifer C Lai
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  An Advanced Practice Practitioner-Based Program to Reduce 30- and 90-Day Readmissions After Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Nadim Mahmud; Samantha Halpern; Rebecca Farrell; Kate Ventura; Arwin Thomasson; Heidi Lewis; Kim M Olthoff; Matthew H Levine; Susanna Nazarian; Vandana Khungar
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  Frailty, mortality, and health care utilization after liver transplantation: From the Multicenter Functional Assessment in Liver Transplantation (FrAILT) Study.

Authors:  Jennifer C Lai; Amy M Shui; Andres Duarte-Rojo; Daniel R Ganger; Robert S Rahimi; Chiung-Yu Huang; Frederick Yao; Matthew Kappus; Brian Boyarsky; Mara McAdams-Demarco; Michael L Volk; Michael A Dunn; Daniela P Ladner; Dorry L Segev; Elizabeth C Verna; Sandy Feng
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 17.298

4.  Frailty and Outcomes After Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Elliot B Tapper
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2019-01-14

5.  Inpatient Frailty Assessment Is Feasible and Predicts Nonhome Discharge and Mortality in Decompensated Cirrhosis.

Authors:  Marina Serper; Sunny Y Tao; Dorothea S Kent; Patrik Garren; Alexander E Burdzy; Jennifer C Lai; Amir Gougol; Pamela M Bloomer; K Rajender Reddy; Michael A Dunn; Andres Duarte-Rojo
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 5.799

6.  Development and Validation of a Model to Predict Long-Term Survival After Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  David Goldberg; Alejandro Mantero; Craig Newcomb; Cindy Delgado; Kimberly Forde; David Kaplan; Binu John; Nadine Nuchovich; Barbara Dominguez; Ezekiel Emanuel; Peter P Reese
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 5.799

7.  Using Admission Karnofsky Performance Status as a Guide for Palliative Care Discharge Needs.

Authors:  Ankita Mehta; Emily Chai; Keisha Berglund; Elizabeth Rizzo; Jaison Moreno; Laura P Gelfman
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 8.  Social, economic, and policy implications of organ preservation advances.

Authors:  Alyssa Ward; David K Klassen; Kate M Franz; Sebastian Giwa; Jedediah K Lewis
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.640

9.  Postoperative Long-Term Independence Among the Elderly With Meningiomas: Function Evolution, Determinant Identification, and Prediction Model Development.

Authors:  Haoyi Li; Huawei Huang; Xiaokang Zhang; Yonggang Wang; Xiaohui Ren; Yong Cui; Dali Sui; Song Lin; Zhongli Jiang; Guobin Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Preoperative high-sensitivity troponin I and B-type natriuretic peptide, alone and in combination, for risk stratification of mortality after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Young-Jin Moon; Hye-Mee Kwon; Kyeo-Woon Jung; Kyoung-Sun Kim; Won-Jung Shin; In-Gu Jun; Jun-Gol Song; Gyu-Sam Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-08-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.