Literature DB >> 29116612

The complement system as a biomarker of disease activity and response to treatment in multiple sclerosis.

Alexandru Tatomir1, Anamaria Talpos-Caia2, Freidrich Anselmo1, Adam M Kruszewski1, Dallas Boodhoo1, Violeta Rus3, Horea Rus4,5,6.   

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory, demyelinating, and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system. The complement system has an established role in the pathogenesis of MS, and evidence suggests that its components can be used as biomarkers of disease-state activity and response to treatment in MS. Plasma C4a levels have been found to be significantly elevated in patients with active relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), as compared to both controls and patients with stable RRMS. C3 levels are also significantly elevated in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with RRMS, and C3 levels are correlated with clinical disability. Furthermore, increased levels of factor H can predict the transition from relapsing to progressive disease, since factor H levels have been found to increase progressively with disease progression over a 2-year period in patients transitioning from RRMS to secondary progressive (SP) MS. In addition, elevations in C3 are seen in primary progressive (PP) MS. Complement components can also differentiate RRMS from neuromyelitis optica. Response gene to complement (RGC)-32, a novel molecule induced by complement activation, is a possible biomarker of relapse and response to glatiramer acetate (GA) therapy, since RGC-32 mRNA expression is significantly decreased during relapse and increased in responders to GA treatment. The predictive accuracy of RGC-32 as a potential biomarker (by ROC analysis) is 90% for detecting relapses and 85% for detecting a response to GA treatment. Thus, complement components can serve as biomarkers of disease activity to differentiate MS subtypes and to measure response to therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; Complement activation; Factor H; Glatiramer acetate; Multiple sclerosis; RGC-32

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29116612      PMCID: PMC6563602          DOI: 10.1007/s12026-017-8961-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunol Res        ISSN: 0257-277X            Impact factor:   2.829


  40 in total

1.  Relapsing and remitting multiple sclerosis: pathology of the newly forming lesion.

Authors:  Michael H Barnett; John W Prineas
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 2.  C5b-9 complement complex in autoimmune demyelination: dual role in neuroinflammation and neuroprotection.

Authors:  Horea Rus; Cornelia Cudrici; Florin Niculescu
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Heterogeneity of multiple sclerosis lesions: implications for the pathogenesis of demyelination.

Authors:  C Lucchinetti; W Brück; J Parisi; B Scheithauer; M Rodriguez; H Lassmann
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 10.422

4.  Complement Receptor 2 is increased in cerebrospinal fluid of multiple sclerosis patients and regulates C3 function.

Authors:  Rickard P F Lindblom; Shahin Aeinehband; Mikael Ström; Faiez Al Nimer; Kerstin Sandholm; Mohsen Khademi; Bo Nilsson; Fredrik Piehl; Kristina N Ekdahl
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Increased soluble C5b-9 in CSF of neuromyelitis optica.

Authors:  H Wang; K Wang; C Wang; W Qiu; Z Lu; X Hu
Journal:  Scand J Immunol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 6.  Membrane attack by complement: the assembly and biology of terminal complement complexes.

Authors:  Cosmin A Tegla; Cornelia Cudrici; Snehal Patel; Richard Trippe; Violeta Rus; Florin Niculescu; Horea Rus
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.829

7.  Tissue microarray methodology identifies complement pathway activation and dysregulation in progressive multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Sam Loveless; James W Neal; Owain W Howell; Katharine E Harding; Patrick Sarkies; Rhian Evans; Ryan J Bevan; Svetlana Hakobyan; Claire L Harris; Neil P Robertson; Bryan Paul Morgan
Journal:  Brain Pathol       Date:  2017-07-30       Impact factor: 6.508

8.  Bystander mechanism for complement-initiated early oligodendrocyte injury in neuromyelitis optica.

Authors:  Lukmanee Tradtrantip; Xiaoming Yao; Tao Su; Alex J Smith; Alan S Verkman
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 17.088

9.  Homogeneity of active demyelinating lesions in established multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Esther C W Breij; Bianca P Brink; Rob Veerhuis; Christa van den Berg; Rianka Vloet; Riqiang Yan; Christine D Dijkstra; Paul van der Valk; Lars Bö
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Intrathecal activation of the complement system and disability in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  F Sellebjerg; I Jaliashvili; M Christiansen; P Garred
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1998-05-07       Impact factor: 3.181

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Immunopathological Factors Associated with Disability in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Erdem Tüzün
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.339

Review 2.  Aberrant Complement System Activation in Neurological Disorders.

Authors:  Karolina Ziabska; Malgorzata Ziemka-Nalecz; Paulina Pawelec; Joanna Sypecka; Teresa Zalewska
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  CD4+/CD45RO+: A Potential Biomarker of the Clinical Response to Glatiramer Acetate.

Authors:  Martin Vališ; Lukáš Sobíšek; Oldřich Vyšata; Blanka Klímová; Ctirad Andrýs; Doris Vokurková; Jiří Masopust; Zbyšek Pavelek
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 4.  Therapeutic Inhibition of the Complement System in Diseases of the Central Nervous System.

Authors:  Sarah M Carpanini; Megan Torvell; Bryan Paul Morgan
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 5.  The Cerebrospinal Fluid in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Florian Deisenhammer; Henrik Zetterberg; Brit Fitzner; Uwe K Zettl
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 6.  Molecular Biomarkers in Multiple Sclerosis and Its Related Disorders: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Maryam Gul; Amirhossein Azari Jafari; Muffaqam Shah; Seyyedmohammadsadeq Mirmoeeni; Safee Ullah Haider; Sadia Moinuddin; Ammar Chaudhry
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  A case report of late-onset atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome during interferon beta in multiple sclerosis: Open issues in literature review.

Authors:  Mosè Parisi; Alessia Manni; Francesca Caputo; Maria Trojano; Damiano Paolicelli
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 8.  Neuroimmune crosstalk and evolving pharmacotherapies in neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Falguni Baidya; Mariya Bohra; Aishika Datta; Deepaneeta Sarmah; Birva Shah; Priya Jagtap; Swapnil Raut; Ankan Sarkar; Upasna Singh; Kiran Kalia; Anupom Borah; Xin Wang; Kunjan R Dave; Dileep R Yavagal; Pallab Bhattacharya
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 9.  Brain-Immune Interactions and Neuroinflammation After Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Virginie Dinet; Klaus G Petry; Jerome Badaut
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Coagulation/Complement Activation and Cerebral Hypoperfusion in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Tatiana Koudriavtseva; Annunziata Stefanile; Marco Fiorelli; Caterina Lapucci; Svetlana Lorenzano; Silvana Zannino; Laura Conti; Giovanna D'Agosto; Fulvia Pimpinelli; Enea Gino Di Domenico; Chiara Mandoj; Diana Giannarelli; Sara Donzelli; Giovanni Blandino; Marco Salvetti; Matilde Inglese
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.