| Literature DB >> 29116014 |
Cheng Zhou1,2,3,4, Bleddyn Jones5, Mahmoud Moustafa6,7,8,9, Christian Schwager6,7,8, Julia Bauer7, Bing Yang10, Liji Cao11, Min Jia12, Andrea Mairani7,13, Ming Chen14, Longhua Chen15, Juergen Debus6,7,8, Amir Abdollahi16,17,18.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Normal lung tissue tolerance constitutes a limiting factor in delivering the required dose of radiotherapy to cure thoracic and chest wall malignancies. Radiation-induced lung fibrosis (RILF) is considered a critical determinant for late normal tissue complications. While RILF mouse models are frequently approached e.g., as a single high dose thoracic irradiation to investigate lung fibrosis and candidate modulators, a systematic radiobiological characterization of RILF mouse model is urgently needed to compare relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of particle irradiation with protons, helium-, carbon and oxygen ions now available at HIT. We aimed to study the dose-response relationship and fractionation effect of photon irradiation in development of pulmonary fibrosis in C57BL/6 mouse.Entities:
Keywords: BED; Fractionation; Lung fibrosis; Thoracic radiotherapy; α/β ratio
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29116014 PMCID: PMC5678815 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0912-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiat Oncol ISSN: 1748-717X Impact factor: 3.481
Fig. 1Overview of the experimental setup. a Simultaneous whole thoracic irradiation with 6 MV Linac (red arrows, anterior-posterior direction of horizontal beam) of up to 10 mice fixed with stretched thoraces in vertical position on a custom holder. Radiotherapy (RT) was followed by longitudinal CT imaging every 4 weeks over an overall period of 24 weeks (Endpoint). b CT-scan of animals under inhalation anesthesia. Note the thoracic area with gray hairs, lack of melanin, indicating the irradiated region. c Processing of CT-images; the lung area was semi-automatically segmented (red line) and manually curated slice by slice. Total lung volume (mm3) and mean lung density (HU) provided the basis for calculation of the lung fibrosis index (FI) as indicated in the methods section. (FI = fibrosis index, HU = Hounsfield unit, RT = radiotherapy, fx = fractionation)
Fig. 2Dose-response modeling of pulmonary fibrosis induction after single and five fractions of photon irradiations. The sigmoidal curves were plotted based on fibrosis index (FI) (Adjusted R =0.972, 0.968 for 1-fx and 5-fx curve, respectively). Single fraction photon doses are shown as solid circles and five fractionated as solid squares
Fig. 3Simulation based estimation of alpha/beta ratio. Estimates of radiobiological parameters according to simulated iso-effect data revealed that the value of α/β ratio for normal lung tissues varies with irradiated doses. a Dose per fraction is plotted against the number of fractions (b). Isoeffect curves with reference to the median, first and third quartiles of α/β ratios are shown
Fig. 4Discovery of a linear quadratic response of lung tissue to whole thoracic irradiation. The LQ-model was applied to fit the in-vivo lung tolerance data, i.e., the degree of fibrosis development determined by FIs after single vs. fractionated irradiation. The negative log10 transformed FI values are plotted as a function of the total prescribed doses. The LQ parameters were derived as: α = 0.048 Gy−1, β = 0.010 Gy−2, α/β = 4.800 Gy for single fraction; α = 0.015 Gy−1, β = 0.0038 Gy−2, α/β = 3.947 Gy for five fractions. Single fraction photon doses are shown as solid circles and 5 fractionated as solid squares
Fig. 5Biologically effective dose (BED) based dose-response modeling of radiation-induced lung fibrosis. The fibrosis index is plotted against the biological effective doses (BEDs) (Adj. R =0.959, 95% confidence interval was given within dot lines). Threshold BED (BED ) as well as BED for developing 50% of fibrosis (BED ) is indicated by the arrows
Fig. 6A systematic review and meta-analysis of α/β ratios from previous mouse experiments considering different surrogates for late radiation induced lung damage. An average of 4.38 ± 1.06 Gy was estimated from this pooled analysis. The detailed characteristics of included literatures are provided in Additional file 1: Table S1. Data are presented as Mean ± SE