| Literature DB >> 29115084 |
Ho Young Hwang1, Sang Yoon Yeom2, Jae Woong Choi1, Se Jin Oh2, Eun Ah Park3, Whal Lee3, Ki Bong Kim4.
Abstract
We evaluated echocardiographic changes of left ventricular (LV) function in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients with LV dysfunction, and examined cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters associated with improved LV function. Seventy-seven CABG patients presenting with decreased LV ejection fraction (LVEF, ≤ 35%) and who underwent preoperative gadolinium-enhanced CMR were enrolled. A 16-segment model was used to analyze CMR imaging. A viable myocardial segment was defined as ≤ 50% transmural extent of late gadolinium enhancement. Serial echocardiographic examinations were performed preoperatively, pre-discharge (median 6 days), and during postoperative year 1 (median 11 months) in 70 patients. Predictors of absolute increase in LVEF (≥ 5%) and proportional changes in LVEF were analyzed. Serial echocardiography demonstrated that LVEF measured 28.6% ± 5.4% preoperatively, 31.5% ± 8.0% median 6 days, and 42.1% ± 10.5% median 11 months postoperatively. Absolute increase of LVEF was observed in 27 patients at pre-discharge and in 24 patients by median 11 months. Proportional changes in LVEF at postoperative median 6 days and 11 months were 14% ± 28% and 57% ± 45%, respectively. The median number of viable myocardial segments was 14 (range, 9-16) in the 16 segment CMR model. Multivariable models demonstrated that the median number of overall viable myocardial segments (≥ 14) in preoperative CMR was associated with absolute increase (P = 0.046) and proportional changes (P = 0.005) in LVEF. In conclusion, the number of viable myocardial segments (≥ 14) in preoperative CMR predicted LV function improvement after CABG in patients with LV dysfunction.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiac Magnetic Resonance; Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery; Late Gadolinium Enhancement; Ventricular Dysfunction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29115084 PMCID: PMC5680501 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.12.2009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Korean Med Sci ISSN: 1011-8934 Impact factor: 2.153
Fig. 1Summary flow diagram showing patient enrollment.
CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting, CMR = cardiac magnetic resonance.
Preoperative characteristics and risk factors of the 77 study patients
| Variables | Study patients (n = 77) | Excluded patients (n = 25) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, yr | 64 ± 11 | 70 ± 9 | 0.009 |
| Female | 14 (18.2) | 6 (24.0) | 0.567 |
| Logistic EUroSCORE | 6.2 (1.3–52.8) | 27.4 (1.7–69.6) | < 0.001 |
| Risk factors | |||
| Smoking | 29 (37.7) | 11 (44.0) | 0.573 |
| Hypertension | 50 (64.9) | 15 (60.0) | 0.656 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 43 (55.8) | 17 (68.0) | 0.283 |
| Overweight (BMI > 25 kg/m2) | 18 (23.4) | 6 (24.0) | 0.949 |
| History of stroke | 10 (13.0) | 4 (16.0) | 0.742 |
| Chronic renal failure | 5 (6.5) | 8 (32.0) | 0.003 |
| Dyslipidemia | 27 (35.1) | 10 (40.0) | 0.656 |
| History of PCI | 14 (18.2) | 4 (16.0) | > 0.999 |
| Acute coronary syndrome | 57 (74.0) | 21 (84.0) | 0.307 |
| Recent MI (< 2 wk) | 21 (27.3) | 13 (52.0) | 0.023 |
| Preoperative IABP insertion | 1 (1.3) | 11 (44.0) | < 0.001 |
| Urgent or emergency operation | 6 (7.8) | 16 (64.0) | < 0.001 |
| LVEF on echocardiography, % | 28.5 ± 5.5 | 26.6 ± 6.3 | 0.194 |
| Mitral regurgitation | 0.087 | ||
| Grade 1 (mild) | 28 (36.4) | 8 (32.0) | |
| Grade 2 (moderate) | 7 (9.1) | 0 (0) | |
| Grade 3 (moderate to severe) | 1 (1.3) | 0 (0) | |
| Angiographic diagnosis | |||
| Left main disease | 18 (23.4) | 8 (32.0) | 0.390 |
| Three-vessel disease | 61 (79.2) | 20 (80.0) | 0.933 |
Values are mean ± standard deviation, median (ranges), or number (%).
EUroSCORE = European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation, BMI = body mass index, PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention, MI = myocardial infarction, IABP = intra-aortic balloon pump, LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction.
Fig. 2Serial changes in LVEF at Pre and Post periods, and during the first year postoperative FU.
(A) LVEF changes in 51 patients who showed absolute increase of LVEF. (B) LVEF changes in 19 patients in whom LVEF was not improved.
LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction, Pre = preoperative, Post = early postoperative, FU = follow-up.
Multivariable analyses for factors associated with absolute increase (≥5%) and proportional changes in LVEF
| Variables | Factors associated with absolute increase in LVEF | Factors associated with proportional changes in the LVEF | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate analysis | Multivariable analysis | Univariate analysis | Multivariable analysis | |||||
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | β ± standard error | β ± standard error | |||||
| Myocardial viability* | 4.00 (1.25–12.80) | 0.020 | 4.40 (1.02–18.90) | 0.046 | 32.81 ± 10.00 | 0.002 | 28.8 ± 10.48 | 0.008 |
| LVEDVI, mL | 0.98 (0.97–1.00) | 0.027 | 0.99 (0.98–1.01) | 0.337 | −0.33 ± 0.14 | 0.018 | −0.19 ± 0.13 | 0.163 |
| Age, yr | 1.06 (1.00–1.12) | 0.037 | 1.05 (0.98–1.11) | 0.145 | - | - | - | - |
| Acute coronary syndrome | - | - | - | - | 28.25 ± 11.83 | 0.020 | 25.10 ± 11.43 | 0.032 |
| Hypertension | - | - | - | - | 19.44 ± 10.98 | 0.081 | −15.73 ± 27.67 | 0.584 |
LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction, OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval, LVEDVI = left ventricular end-diastolic volume index.
*Number of viable (transmurality of infarct scar on late gadolinium enhancement ≤ 50%) myocardial segments ≥ 14.
Fig. 3Comparison of event-free survivals between the patients with number of viable segments ≥ 14 (red line) and those with viable segments < 14 (blue line). (A) overall survival. (B) freedom from composite event of cardiac death or readmission due to congestive heart failure.