Literature DB >> 29114646

The retromolar canal and its variations: Classification using cone beam computed tomography.

Penporn Luangchana, Suchaya Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri, Jira Kitisubkanchana, Chanchai Wongchuensoontorn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of the retromolar canal and its various patterns using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHOD AND MATERIALS: CBCT images with the presence of mandibular third molars from August 2013 to May 2015 were retrospectively investigated. The presence of retromolar canal, its patterns, sides, as well as gender were evaluated by two observers. The pattern of retromolar canal was initially classified into three types: Type A, superior type; Type B, radicular-retromolar type; and Type C, dental type. During the investigation, two additional types were found and further classified: Type D, plexus type; and Type E, forward type. The distribution of retromolar canals between genders and sides was statistically analyzed with Pearson's chi-square test.
RESULTS: A total of 201 mandibular sites in 156 subjects (99 women, 57 men) were included. Among them, 128 sites had retromolar canals (63.68%). The presence of retromolar canal was not statistically related to gender or side. Most of the retromolar canals were the radicular-retromolar type (Type B, 38.10%), followed by the superior type (Type A, 29.93%), dental type (Type C, 19.73%), plexus type (Type D, 6.80%), and forward type (Type E, 5.44%).
CONCLUSION: There was a high frequency of retromolar canals and these could be classified into five patterns. The clinician should be aware of this anatomical structure when performing surgical procedures involving the retromolar area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29114646     DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a39224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quintessence Int        ISSN: 0033-6572            Impact factor:   1.677


  4 in total

1.  Can lower third molar position indicate the need for preoperative cone beam computed tomography exploration of retromolar canal?

Authors:  Svetlana Antic; Biljana Markovic-Vasiljkovic; Ognjen Radivojević; Aleksa Janovic; Djurdja Bracanovic
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 1.882

2.  Prevalence and morphometric analysis of the retromolar canal in a Spanish population sample: a helical CT scan study.

Authors:  M Puche-Roses; A Blasco-Serra; A-A Valverde-Navarro; M Puche-Torres
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2022-03-01

3.  Prevalence and Characteristics of Accessory Mandibular Canals: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study in a European Adult Population.

Authors:  Giuseppe Varvara; Beatrice Feragalli; Ilser Turkyilmaz; Aurelio D'Alonzo; Fabiola Rinaldi; Serena Bianchi; Maurizio Piattelli; Guido Macchiarelli; Sara Bernardi
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-04

4.  Assessment of the Retromolar Canal in Taiwan Subpopulation: A Cross-Sectional Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study in a Medical Center.

Authors:  Yen-Wen Shen; Wan-Chun Chang; Heng-Li Huang; Ming-Tzu Tsai; Lih-Jyh Fuh; Jui-Ting Hsu
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2021-05-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.