Mirsad Dupanovic1, Ron Krebill2, Iris Dupanovic3, John Nachtigal1, Melissa Rockford1, Walter Orr1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA. 2. Department of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA. 3. Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Morbidly obese patients are traditionally hospitalised following bariatric surgery. However, laparoscopic-adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is amenable for ambulatory care. We hypothesised that the majority of patients can receive an ambulatory LAGB and that both surgical and anaesthetic perioperative factors will significantly affect non-ambulatory LAGB outcomes. METHODS: Medical records of 201 consecutive LAGB patients performed at the University of Kansas Medical Centre during a 3-y period were reviewed. Demographic, medical, laboratory, anaesthetic, intraoperative and postoperative data were collected. Factors associated with non-ambulatory outcomes were identified and analysed using logistic regression, and a classification tree analysis was used to rank the descriptive model factor to the non-ambulatory outcome. RESULTS: Average patient age was 43.4±11.4 years, and average body mass index was 48.2±10.3 kg m2-1. A total of 155 patients (77.1%; 95% confidence interval, 71%-83%; p<0.0001) were discharged home within 2-3 hours of surgery, whereas 36 stayed for 23 hours and 10 required hospital admission for 1-2 days. Increased surgical port numbers (p=0.007), ≥50% of total intraoperative fentanyl administered in the recovery room (post-anaesthesia care unit) for the treatment of postoperative pain (p=0.007) and a lack of prophylactic beta-blockade (p=0.001) were three factors associated with non-ambulatory outcomes. Obstructive sleep apnoea was not associated with a non-ambulatory outcome (p=0.83). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients received an ambulatory LAGB. Meticulous laparoscopic surgical technique with the least feasible number of access ports and multimodal analgesic technique aimed at reduction of postoperative opioid consumption are the most important factors for a successful ambulatory LAGB outcome.
OBJECTIVE: Morbidly obese patients are traditionally hospitalised following bariatric surgery. However, laparoscopic-adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is amenable for ambulatory care. We hypothesised that the majority of patients can receive an ambulatory LAGB and that both surgical and anaesthetic perioperative factors will significantly affect non-ambulatory LAGB outcomes. METHODS: Medical records of 201 consecutive LAGB patients performed at the University of Kansas Medical Centre during a 3-y period were reviewed. Demographic, medical, laboratory, anaesthetic, intraoperative and postoperative data were collected. Factors associated with non-ambulatory outcomes were identified and analysed using logistic regression, and a classification tree analysis was used to rank the descriptive model factor to the non-ambulatory outcome. RESULTS: Average patient age was 43.4±11.4 years, and average body mass index was 48.2±10.3 kg m2-1. A total of 155 patients (77.1%; 95% confidence interval, 71%-83%; p<0.0001) were discharged home within 2-3 hours of surgery, whereas 36 stayed for 23 hours and 10 required hospital admission for 1-2 days. Increased surgical port numbers (p=0.007), ≥50% of total intraoperative fentanyl administered in the recovery room (post-anaesthesia care unit) for the treatment of postoperative pain (p=0.007) and a lack of prophylactic beta-blockade (p=0.001) were three factors associated with non-ambulatory outcomes. Obstructive sleep apnoea was not associated with a non-ambulatory outcome (p=0.83). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients received an ambulatory LAGB. Meticulous laparoscopic surgical technique with the least feasible number of access ports and multimodal analgesic technique aimed at reduction of postoperative opioid consumption are the most important factors for a successful ambulatory LAGB outcome.
Entities:
Keywords:
Ambulatory surgery; bariatric surgery; laparoscopic surgery; outpatient surgery
Authors: Jeffrey B Gross; Kenneth L Bachenberg; Jonathan L Benumof; Robert A Caplan; Richard T Connis; Charles J Coté; David G Nickinovich; Vivek Prachand; Denham S Ward; Edward M Weaver; Lawrence Ydens; Song Yu Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Kevin F Montgomery; Brad M Watkins; Jessie H Ahroni; Robert Michaelson; Ronald E Abrams; Marc D Erlitz; James E Scurlock Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Brad M Watkins; Kevin F Montgomery; Jessie H Ahroni; Marc D Erlitz; Ronald E Abrams; James E Scurlock Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: P J Devereaux; Homer Yang; Salim Yusuf; Gordon Guyatt; Kate Leslie; Juan Carlos Villar; Denis Xavier; Susan Chrolavicius; Launi Greenspan; Janice Pogue; Prem Pais; Lisheng Liu; Shouchun Xu; German Málaga; Alvaro Avezum; Matthew Chan; Victor M Montori; Mike Jacka; Peter Choi Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-05-12 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Kent C Sasse; John H Ganser; Mark D Kozar; Robert W Watson; Dionne C L Lim; Laurie McGinley; Curtis J Smith; Vicki Bovee; Jenna Beh Journal: JSLS Date: 2009 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 2.172