Literature DB >> 29114085

Opinion: The Next Generation Researchers Initiative at NIH.

Michael Lauer1, Lawrence Tabak2, Francis Collins2.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2017        PMID： 29114085      PMCID： PMC5692611          DOI： 10.1073/pnas.1716941114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN： 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


× No keyword cloud information.
  12 in total

1.  Future of fundamental discovery in US biomedical research.

Authors:  Michael Levitt; Jonathan M Levitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact.

Authors:  Roberta Sinatra; Dashun Wang; Pierre Deville; Chaoming Song; Albert-László Barabási
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Data-driven predictions in the science of science.

Authors:  Aaron Clauset; Daniel B Larremore; Roberta Sinatra
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Association of percentile ranking with citation impact and productivity in a large cohort of de novo NIMH-funded R01 grants.

Authors:  J M Doyle; K Quinn; Y A Bodenstein; C O Wu; N Danthi; M S Lauer
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 15.992

5.  Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws.

Authors:  Bruce Alberts; Marc W Kirschner; Shirley Tilghman; Harold Varmus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Strategies from UW-Madison for rescuing biomedical research in the US.

Authors:  Judith Kimble; William M Bement; Qiang Chang; Benjamin L Cox; Norman R Drinkwater; Richard L Gourse; Aaron A Hoskins; Anna Huttenlocher; Pamela K Kreeger; Paul F Lambert; Marsha R Mailick; Shigeki Miyamoto; Richard L Moss; Kate M O'Connor-Giles; Avtar Roopra; Krishanu Saha; Hannah S Seidel
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  How Criterion Scores Predict the Overall Impact Score and Funding Outcomes for National Institutes of Health Peer-Reviewed Applications.

Authors:  Matthew K Eblen; Robin M Wagner; Deepshikha RoyChowdhury; Katherine C Patel; Katrina Pearson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  NIH peer review percentile scores are poorly predictive of grant productivity.

Authors:  Ferric C Fang; Anthony Bowen; Arturo Casadevall
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Shifting Demographics among Research Project Grant Awardees at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

Authors:  Marc F Charette; Young S Oh; Christine Maric-Bilkan; Lindsey L Scott; Charles C Wu; Matthew Eblen; Katrina Pearson; H Eser Tolunay; Zorina S Galis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Big Science vs. Little Science: How Scientific Impact Scales with Funding.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Fortin; David J Currie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240
View more
  7 in total

1.  Aging and scientific medicine: 60 is the new 40.

Authors:  Serpil C Erzurum
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Mentorship for Nurse Scientists: Strategies for Growth From the Oncology Nursing Society Research Mentorship Task Force.

Authors:  Margaret Q Rosenzweig; Donald E Bailey; Nancy J Bush; Lorinda A Coombs; Rebecca H Lehto; Victoria Loerzel; Virginia Sun; Kathi Mooney; Mary E Cooley
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  Commentary: NIH Funding Remains Vital for Cardiothoracic Surgeon Scientists.

Authors:  Christopher T Ryan; Todd K Rosengart
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-02-18

4.  Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort.

Authors:  Jamie Mihoko Doyle; Michael T Baiocchi; Michaela Kiernan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  PEPATAC: an optimized pipeline for ATAC-seq data analysis with serial alignments.

Authors:  Jason P Smith; M Ryan Corces; Jin Xu; Vincent P Reuter; Howard Y Chang; Nathan C Sheffield
Journal:  NAR Genom Bioinform       Date:  2021-11-23

6.  The increasing importance of fellowships and career development awards in the careers of early-stage biomedical academic researchers.

Authors:  Christopher L Pickett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Tximeta: Reference sequence checksums for provenance identification in RNA-seq.

Authors:  Michael I Love; Charlotte Soneson; Peter F Hickey; Lisa K Johnson; N Tessa Pierce; Lori Shepherd; Martin Morgan; Rob Patro
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 4.475
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.